is this even legit ??
in just one year?
>>2832842
both are pretty shit so i would say yeah
>>2832842
You say it like the first one isn't good or something.
>>2832842
heres what happen
the pinoy artist who drew this learned not to symbol draw, and now he can somewhat decently copy photos
>>2832842
If you look at Proko, you will realize that pic 1 and pic 2 are two different skillsets. Second one especially looks like it was just a copy from a photograpy.
Let the guy do now some character design like in 2015 and let's see the difference. I bet there will be nearly none and he won't even be able to make proper thumbnails.
>>2832948
"kek a thread about me"
Pretending he's not the one who originally made the thread.
If you're going to show off, why don't you show some actual improvement? A photo study isn't comparable to character design sheets.
Yes of course. If you know how to study.
>>2833232
Prove it
>>2832842
but can he draw anime?
ANIME CONFIRMED HARDER THAN REALISTICISM
>>2833153
>Pretending he's not the one who originally made the thread.
i really did not made this
>>2832948
Rub your talent on our art senpai
but no really can you give us a breakdown of what you did to get better so fast
>>2833555
i just pay attention to this Critique( im implying to the anon that give good Critique criticism)
and read the all the book on the book thread
>>2832844
Anon, do you have eyes?
First one's shit too.
>>2833545
>trying this hard
>>2832842
it's an alright improvement. seems pretty achievable, to be honest. doesn't really impress me to be honest. maybe post it on facebook for better reactions
>>2832842
but of course because pic related.