Nice high quality art thread

>>2803679
whos the artist? I like it, cant read the signature.

>>2803701
Says Jan van Beers.

File: 1476968845124.gif (2MB, 500x390px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x390px

>>2803702

>>2803687
>>2803707
>>2803800
complete shit

>>2803817
(you)

>>2803817
kinda true.

>>2803819
even with passable rendering those pieces look very shallow and unnatural.

>>2803817
Post yours faggot

>>2803678
>all those messy edges
I thought you said quality art

File: 10.jpg (566KB, 800x1100px) Image search: [Google]

566KB, 800x1100px

>>2803817
Instead of whining why don't you post something you consider quality?

>>2803877

>if it doesnt look like its painted by algenpfleger its shit

File: sample-dddae48c0184dac9476f1c62e57140d6.jpg (159KB, 1333x1000px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1333x1000px

>>2803678

>>2803678
Why is there a circle on her cleavage?

>>2803950
it's called a boob window

>>2803946
>>2803952
The autistic anime fags are here

>>2803817
I gotta agree in parts with that about those:

>>2803707
>>2803800


Those are far from being shit, but compared to really high level stuff they feel very unnatural and lifeless, like the artists tried way too hard to make lots of details and lost the spontaneity.

File: __original_drawn_by_scorpionfish__sample-d99d75c40f09f52bc94fac1bb13fd32c.jpg (79KB, 850x501px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 850x501px

this and......

File: __original_drawn_by_momiji_mao__32de9d961358031a518da4541467c1bf.jpg (142KB, 847x700px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 847x700px

>>2804009
....this

>>2803946
>>2803952
Come on son, I get it's 4chan kek and all that.
Dont shit up the thread with obvious troll posting

>>2803877
why is /ic/ so fucking full of tryhard dweebs

File: 1475033256984.png (889KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

889KB, 1000x750px

>>2804014

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2y-GFJq2qA

>>2804022
wow

File: 8.jpg (159KB, 554x960px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 554x960px

Roberto Ferri.

>>2803893
>>2804017
lol ok

>>2804010
oh boy

File: 1475557294347.jpg (279KB, 1500x1013px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 1500x1013px

>>2803952
go and suck kyles dick if you want but dont do it in this thread. yikes.

>>2804430
nice snow

>>2804406
is that Saturn?

File: 59756.jpg (1MB, 787x1195px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 787x1195px

>>2803773
Really like that one too, it's scary how good his values are.

File: 1481845139645.jpg (246KB, 1221x1916px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 1221x1916px

>>2804856

File: 1481839881534.jpg (395KB, 1224x1000px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 1224x1000px

>>2804860

daily remined digital art is not art at all

>>2804488
Psst... Paradise lost

>>2804481
not sure if a joke or not

>>2804860

outies are so gross

>>2804889
daily reminder.

you're a fucking retard.

>>2803972
moar boob windows

>>2803680
>>2803679
If only these artist had access to actually beautiful models...

File: elsa__frozen__by_jiyu_kaze-d78bgxt.jpg (391KB, 841x1300px) Image search: [Google]

391KB, 841x1300px

>>2803678
Meet my senpai

File: the true story behind the 2016 presidential election.jpg (81KB, 600x637px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 600x637px

>>2804036
Clownpiece a true a merican hero

File: b637ba95ff83aae09dec1f1a13f594e4516ce78e49357-Ga6GXC.jpg (293KB, 1280x1058px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1280x1058px

>>2803678

>>2803678
>>2806854
op's one is more interesting

>>2804020
more like this?

>>2803877
You tryna say Karla cant draw?

File: saga_and_kanon_by_rogner5th-d6pq0a8.jpg (607KB, 707x1000px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 707x1000px

by rogner5th.

>>2804430
I want to eat that foam
and those rocks too actually

>>2806001
beauty is in the eye of the beholder

File: 1472849899620.gif (1MB, 264x264px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 264x264px

>>2806001

>>2806947
C'mon anon. We are artists
Are you gonna tell me you don't think there is objective beauty?

>>2806947
>>2806954

Beauty is both objective and subjective.

>>2806956
you are not as smart as you think you are.

>>2806957

There is such a thing as objective beauty because it is tied to our biology. We have always found symmetry and certain facial relationships attractive. At the same time there is also the aspect of cultural variation where certain aspects such as big behinds are more praised in certain areas. There is no conflict between these two. If you think beauty is completely arbitrary you are brain washed by post modernism.

File: tumblr_n91n9mquEm1symjcoo1_1280.jpg (449KB, 1280x1252px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 1280x1252px

>>2804010
Love food art.

>>2803678
all of that effort to paint a girl that isn't attractive.
fucking lol that's what you get for needing a model to paint a face.

File: 1474631711042.gif (341KB, 176x176px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 176x176px

>>2806968

Either certain object can be structurally appealing to the human mind, and are in that sense objectively beautiful. That assumes that humans are pretty similarly wired and thus like similar stuff.

or

beauty is social construct and as such subjective.

It cannot be in the same sense objective and subjective because those terms are exclusive of one another. We might have 2 different concepts of beauty, one cultural and one "biological" but that doesnt mean the same concept is at the same time objective and subjective.

I feel stupid for arguing on 4chin about the semantic of aesthetics. Btw, I am not the "beauty lies in the eye of the beholder" idiot

>>2806980
>social construct
Getting tired of hearing that word

>>2806980
>I was only pretending to be sexy and gorgeous

>>2806980

Think of it like food. There are cultural variations and people have different preferences but there is still a logic to why certain foods are generally perceived to be better tasting than others. Nothing is purely nature or nurture.

>>2807000
my point is that nature and nurture bring about 2 different concepts of beauty, no one concept that is both objective and subjective.

>>2806980

Sure, empirically speaking there are aspects of what we think of as beautiful that are culturally determined, but whether or not you believe beauty as a concept can be reduced to those things is a metaphysical question.

Beauty relates to our structuring of the world into what is and isn't true true or right. Something is seen as beautiful either because we feel instinctively that it expresses a truth, or that it portrays an ideal of how things ought to be. The question whether or not beauty is subjective essencially boils down to whether you believe that true/false and right/wrong are social constructs, which is to say, whether you believe in an objective or a subjective reality.

File: in the eye of a beholder.png (88KB, 579x607px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 579x607px

>>2806947
R-really?

File: 1461180138285.gif (2MB, 300x203px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x203px

>>2807015
>Something is seen as beautiful either because we feel instinctively that it expresses a truth, or that it portrays an ideal of how things ought to be

Whether something is beautiful and whether it appeals to us aesthetically has not necessarily something to do with deeper "truth" or meaning.

I would argue we don't know why something appeals to us, we try to rationalize and make up reasons after the fact, but at no point can one know for certain why they like a certain painting.
Kant said (roughly) that the structure of the object in question in some sense appeals to the structure of the human mind and that this constitutes beauty. That seems reasonable for me. What in the structure however exactly is appealing to me, I have no idea.

File: 1478721365316.jpg (62KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 400x400px

>>2807017

>>2807024
Kant had some important insights, but his philosophy falls apart the moment he tries to make the leap from analytically-descriptive to analytically-creative. His concept of ethics is just as flawed as his aesthetics, and Schopenhauers critique of Kants conception of space and time, which seems pretty spot on to me, shows that these problems already exist in his metaphysics.

Your comment also reminded me that this video exists:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7M-cmNdiFuI

>>2807042
Yea, all in all, Kant just doesnt work, nobody is disputing that. I was trying to reconstruct some of his good points. This idea that beauty is, how the structure of the thing appeals to our structure as humans for example sounds, though not all that useful, reasonable to me.

>>2804009
not to comment on the painting, but i've sometimes noticed these colors on the edge of some shadows, rarely, but I did, what causes it ? is it just the edge of the shirt that let some light pass through or something ?

>>2806940
those characters are too close, it feels so out of place

File: 1466393014587.jpg (607KB, 2056x1300px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 2056x1300px

>>2806916

>>2803678
This isn't that good at all. There seems to be little understanding of structure, it's a mess. wtf is with her boobs?? It's literally just a thin line.

File: ear_ssstest_zps8606f2ed.jpg (26KB, 1023x1024px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 1023x1024px

>>2807112
Subsurface scattering, the light kind spreads out under the skin and makes that glow, usually orange and more visible in ears and nose, leaves and other thin surfaces.
kinda like it does on the ear
Pic related

>>2806854
What the fuck.

>>2807429

He applied the kr0n filter

>>2807431
Who's that kr0n guy and how do we make him stop doing this ?

>>2807365
>>2807112
That is not subsurface scattering. That happens when light passes through an object or diffuses inside an object that is not opaque. Skin is pink because of subsurface scattering but this is not it.

This follows the edge of the shadow, and its not because of the surface. If you have a strong directional light you get those cast shadows. Everything not in the shadow will be lit more than half tone and get lower saturation, and the shadow also has lower saturation. You can get a stronger saturation along the cast shadow's edge because it's closer to half tone. If the more diffuse the edge becomes the more gradual the gradient becomes. Most of the time you do not notice it strongly at all.

>>2807456
ah, i see, I wasn't aware :P
I need to study more...

>>2807447
>>2807429
>>2806854
kr0nz is at it again.....

File: yourexistencedisgusts me.jpg (143KB, 675x1200px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 675x1200px

>>2807447
Impossible. He has an army of fanbois whose battlecry is "You're just jealous of someone who made it".

>>2806954
What drives this board's brief moments of intellectual regression?

>>2807694
Is she fucking grinding on him lol

>>2807694
xD

>>2808128
MOAR

>>2806935
no. Im saying she cant paint.

>>2808152

Dunning-Kruger is one hell of a drug

File: diffraction.jpg (223KB, 1000x526px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 1000x526px

>>2807456
>>2807611
i am 100% sure that it its not light diffusing through a non-opaque object

diffusion is the spreading of light due to a non-even/flat surface, e.g. a matte surface

this however is due to diffraction of light. since light has wave properties due to the wave/particle duality, light bends around corners or edges. an example would be how you can see light from the sun around the corner of a building even though the actual sun is not in front of you.

as such, the light shown on the skin pigment has a high saturation and it looks more 'burnt'

>>2808325
Back to /sci/, stemlord.

>>2808363
back to 19th century, shitbrain

>>2807694
god, this is just fucking ugly.

>>2803695
so much anatomy edited out by the artist. her arms don't connect to the torso in any meaningful way. lovely colors though.

>>2804062
amazing.

>>2809062

You are a woman, right?
It's always the women who feel the need to nitpick whenever someone paints a attractive female figure

btw the arms connect just fine to the torso.

>>2807694
what is wrong with sycra

>>2806939
i love kolesov so fuckin much man fuck how is he allowed to be this level of god tier fucking kill me

>>2806089
this guy had an oc drawing contest once
i submitted something, even. when i look back on it it looked pretty bad but it was fun.
this guys rendering is fucking insane.

>>2803695
artist? this is stunning

>>2804062
mastery on 100

>>2809184

Loomis

>>2809062
>meaningful way
What bunch of nonsensical wording.

They connect just fine, the artist just simply didn't define the shoulders for whatever reason.

>>2804062
her right leg ruins it

>>2807207
what a stupid complaint lmao

>>2809307
Fuck how do i draw soft skin like this

>>2806877
Link?

>>2809397
shut the fuck up, you cant draw and will never paint like this man.

>>2809818
Does anybody actually know who did this? Picture search only gives me hundreds of wallpaper pages.

>>2809847
Andrew "Android" Jones

>>2808307
except thats not relevant nor a drug

>>2807365
>>2807456
>>2808325
except its neither. its just a shitty meme and doesnt make any sense. The red tint goes from the leg to the swimming suit, so its not subsurface scattering. it also goes from core shadow and then inverts when it hits the suit. its really just a shitty understanding of what sub surface scattering is and knowing where your shadows are, and that artist obviously knows neither.

>>2809188
I didn't ask for memes, just tell me his name.

>>2809848
Normally I don't care for that sort of shit, but that is fairly interesting.

>>2809916
Personally I would assume it's meant to be light diffracted by the edge of the fabric. Doesn't really make much sense being so exaggerated though, as it's quite a subtle effect in real life.

>>2809924
It's literally Loomis you dumb fuck. If you spent literally half a second to reverse image search you'd find out.

File: by_dust02_2560.jpg (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

what does /ic/ think of simon stalenhag

>>2810007
stop shilling yourself simon

>>2809496
Yes

>>2810007
his new work sucks. when it was just people, cars, mechs, and derelict machinery it was appealing. Now he's all into his "VR is the devil" "stop watching TV" "Technology da wurst" shit...

>>2809755
fuck off ferri, that leg is horrendous and making such claims on an anonymous person is pathetic

>>2810007

He's very good at cars and ortographic-style perspective, but it gets pushed a bit too hard and appears flat and photograph-like. Colors are always dull, everything kinda gets rendered the same, no vibrancy or stroke variety. I'm a fellow swedecuck btw, and know plenty of folks who worship him, never any distinguished or interesting artsy people, just nerds and gamers

>>2809307
>tfw local museum has a massive permanent Bougureau painting
>upcoming temporary exhibit is gonna bring in more works of his
I'm ready to metaphorically orgasm in a public space.

>>2810148
>autism

>>2810154

Vilket jävla skitsnack, slår vad om att du inte hade vågat snacka sådär om mina målningar irl. Jag gick faktiskt på karate förut så vakta din tunga unge man.
Arg och ledsen
/Simon

>>2809933
probably because its representational of a beach scene and not abstract meaningless crap

File: shadow edge.jpg (397KB, 850x678px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 850x678px

>>2809937
>Doesn't really make much sense being so exaggerated though, as it's quite a subtle effect in real life.
w-what?
>>2809916
Why do you people assume artists go for a practice in photorealistic rendering and accordingly fail if it is not that?
The artist exaggerated the effect, because to them, and others too, it is aesthetically pleasing.
And I think this anon described it best >>2807456 , though I don't see how sss is not involved in this. The halftone can only be this saturated because of it.

>>2809848
The direction used to place the dollops of paint makethe waves look backwards which is a shame.

>>2810409
i love the textures on this, thanks for posting!

>>2809184
>>2809924
>>2809958
His name is literally in the corner of the fucking painting.

>>2810730
>tfw it really is Loomis
Wait, he's actually good?

>>2804020
I would have liked this more if there wasn't a person sitting down in it.

>>2810766
Way to scare the shit out of me, didn't even realize there was a person in there.

File: 3e3ec8cb34208b87be5c4922afe2a738.jpg (217KB, 650x920px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 650x920px

>>2810798

>>2803698
>>2803700
>>2804021
Very cozy. I like that old English aesthetic.

>>2810274
>it is aesthetically pleasing.
i said right from the get go that it is a dumb fucking meme. i wasnt being technical about what it is. I just know what its not.

File: tumblr_oiuth7th7U1vw2b24o1_1280.jpg (217KB, 1280x1548px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1280x1548px

Can I post Vens work here? I think she's good but I am still too scared to add her on facebook! What should I say to her if she accepts my friend request? Will she think I'm a stalker or creep?

>>2809118
its not kolesov tho

>>2806947
>unironically believing this

File: piotr-jablonski-the-moth-king-serkonan-legends-s.jpg (414KB, 917x1600px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 917x1600px

>>2809118
Piotr Jablonski
https://www.artstation.com/artwork/E4Ymv

>>2804009
Source?

File: 1467084638317.jpg (157KB, 600x598px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 600x598px

>>2803678
Soey Milk

File: sergey-kolesov-mermaid-sharpen.jpg (232KB, 1600x1066px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 1600x1066px

>>2811300
Sergey Kolesov

File: hoooook (82).jpg (486KB, 639x2000px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 639x2000px

>>2811302
Hoooook (five O's)

>>2811307
looks like tumblr shit

>>2811474
>tumblr shit
you and i have been visiting very different tumblrs

>>2811307
Ok just a quick question are these done in greyscale then colored on top of? Anyoneknow?

File: Hookwoojin.png (750KB, 838x867px) Image search: [Google]

750KB, 838x867px

>>2811307
i started following this guy on instagram when he was doing a lot of stuff in ballpoint pen
pretty cool stuff

>>2811511
Judging by the visible distinct brushstrokes on the edges, I don't think it was done completely in black and white and then colored.
I'm familiar with his gallery though and he often posts a lot of different, edited and tweaked versions of one image, so he plays around a lot with blending mode and changing colors.
So it's probably both, direct painting and editing/overlaying here and there.

>>2811484
tumblr shit is not only red noses and terrible looks

>>2806940
This looks like a shitty RPG
>Hey Gaijin, wanna buy a sword?

>>2811307
Does he have a tumblr? Ironic question but its the app I use.

>>2810880
Vens stuff is really bad, bland and boring BBB.

File: Zdzisław-Beksiński-tree.jpg (78KB, 753x550px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 753x550px

>>2810897

>dumb alt-right cunt

k

File: zdzislaw_beksinski_1972_2.jpg (73KB, 860x768px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 860x768px

>>2813295

beksinski

File: zdzislaw_beksinski_1978_4.jpg (47KB, 639x768px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 639x768px

>>2813296

File: Beksinski-obraz10.jpg (48KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 600x600px

>>2813296
b e k s i n k i

File: zdzislaw_beksinski_1979.jpg (45KB, 626x768px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 626x768px

>>2813301
gimi dat

b e k s i n s k i

File: zdzislaw_beksinski_1979_2.jpg (60KB, 799x710px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 799x710px

>>2813302

>>2813295
who are you quoting?
What i meant was this kind of thinking encourages justification of low quality artwork as something you "just don't get". Subjective in art is fairly new concept, and didn't really exist pre 20th century, it became merely a toll for galleries to produce artwork with low effort for richest fucker to invest their money in, simply to avoid taxation. But hey I'm just a dumb cunt

>>2809062
Are you suggesting he should go back to his loomis ?

>>2812495
Could understand why you think it's boring or bland, but it's not bad.
I don't think it deserves to be in this thread though, even though I think she might be the best or at least one of the best people on /ic/. At least I think she has one of the fastest improvements anyone on this board has ever had.

>>2806001
>objectivism
welcome to icy

>>2803877
beginner spotted

>>2811307
Ilya Kuvshinov tier

>>2813323
He was crying deeply about the past masters not choosing 'hot chix bro' for their work.

>>2810880
Just add her nerd. She lurks /ic/ you know so if anything would make her think you're a creep its these posts you keep making.

>>2810880
You can't, because she is beginner tier.

File: HidebrandtTolkineBeorn.jpg (2MB, 1240x1019px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1240x1019px

>>2803678

>>2810797
source?

>>2810880
she sucks. I'm gonna add her on Facebook right now though. I'm a total Chad btw. Get rekt.

>>2806854
Seeing this made me wanna jump off a bridge. please stop doing shit like this.

>>2804020
hngg thank you

>>2806854

poor karla..

>>2810880
I didn't get a request from you? Please don't just post my art on /ic/ like this. I appreciate you like it, but it's a bit embarrassing to have it compared to actual professional artists.

>>2812495
Well, yeah my stuff is pretty bad, but I'm trying and I'll get better, hopefully your opinion will change then :).

>>2813497
Aww thanks man, but I'm nowhere near one of the best people on the board.

>>2814615
Yeah I suck, you didn't add me either though. Not sure what you are trying to say or do?

>>2814884
fuck off whore

>>2814884
aint noone got time to request your trash art slut

>>2806980
Beauty is subjective because of the diversity of genetics and mutations in our species. The combination is unique for everyone and so everyone uniquely wants to smash whatever is they want to smash

>>2814884
>this whole post

tumblr would suit you better, go there and never come back, thanks

>>2807230
Fucking Russians

File: Evening_-_Applying_handcuffs.png (671KB, 813x425px) Image search: [Google]

671KB, 813x425px

>>2815547
look at it as their reward for going through the apocalypse, twice.

>>2803683

This is beautiful. I'm in awe.

>>2810213
Please do not post Bob Ross crap...

File: ceb.gif (4MB, 398x248px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 398x248px

>>2807343
are you... retarded?

>>2815773
stop

>>2814929
>>2814962
>>2815421

I don't know, do you want somebody who is not cancer to fuck off just because they are better than you? Have you ever talked to her? Are you jealous because she got good and you haven't yet?

Also where does the idea of requesting art come from?

Just leave her alone. Draw instead of insulting competent artists. Or you can just try chasing away everybody who isn't cancer like you.

>>2809307
are they trying to drown him

>>2816018
nah, they want to fuck

File: c.jpg (182KB, 800x548px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 800x548px

According to Greek legend there was a famous prostitute called Phryne who managed to avoid a death sentence by showing the judges her boobs and arguing that it would be a crime against the Gods to destroy something so beautiful.

>>2815999
Nice try girl. Nice projections, i am better than you and I just dont like shilling.

>>2816018
They're trying to calm his libido by pulling into the water

>>2816101
Aw, I thought they were going to give him a bath.

>>2815899

I see nothing wrong with it, looked like a photo from the thumbnail.

>>2816429
it is a photo. a photo of bad art

>>2816441

I don't think it's bad art at all. Whoever made it has a good understanding of color splotching. Some of you are pretty senile.

>>2810189
where the fuck do you live?

>>2816519
its shit anon.
and apart of me thinks that you made it since you are so pathetically defending a piece of normie shit.
there is nothing good about that painting

>theme: fan art, and the most mainstream overpainted fan art at that. 2/10

>execution/tech: brush strokes are without meaning and life, whilst the pallet is dull and boring, the lighting and tones are just plain shit. its like the artist did not even look at thier own ref image properly (yes i know its reffed because if one has not seen that image of the jokers face in pop culture they are autistic). 2/10

>integrity: none. zero 0/10

>composition: mid mid. literally t-shit tier 3/10

i could go on, its shit, get gud taste, or if you asre the artist, just git gud.

>>2809116
Proof talent is real
It's called taste.
He literally has some of the worst aesthetic judgment possible

>>2803991
Lip is that you?

File: caravaggio_desktop_6000x4657_hd-wallpaper-803732.jpg (4MB, 6000x4657px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 6000x4657px

>>2803678

>>2817466
Have seen it irl, fantastic painting. Ty for the hires version.

>>2817551
I gotchu

I'm jelly af though, I have yet to see any of his works in person

>>2805586
morgan weistling is god

>>2806947
>booty is in the eye of the beer-holder

gonna make it

File: goat_by_hoooook-d5ecc8u.jpg (125KB, 1232x649px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1232x649px

>>2811307
hoooook is god

File: 6af22b4225db.jpg (980KB, 1701x2037px) Image search: [Google]

980KB, 1701x2037px

does anyone have any really old art that looks like it was made with photoshop?

the only one i can think of is that one sargent piece with the lanterns

File: Alt_Rudolf_von_Figures_On_The_Riva_Degli_Schiavone.jpg (169KB, 1000x696px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1000x696px

>>2803678
Austrian Art

File: Gause_Wilhelm_The_State_Ball.jpg (229KB, 1000x746px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 1000x746px

>>2818394

File: Beaudin_Jean_A_lady_Holding_A_Fan.jpg (243KB, 1000x770px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 1000x770px

>>2818398
Belgium Art

File: Beauduin_Jean_Vestales_Au_Bain.jpg (208KB, 1000x814px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1000x814px

>>2818405
More Belgium Art

File: Berghe_Charles_Auguste_van_den_Egisthe,_Croyant_Decouvrir_Le_Corps_D%20Oreste_Mort.jpg (132KB, 1000x754px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1000x754px

>>2818407
That is dramatic

File: BOEL_Pieter_Large_Vanitas_Still_Life.jpg (164KB, 1051x828px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1051x828px

>>2818409
And a Vanitas Still Life for (YOU)
>>2818407
>>2818405
>>2818398

>>2818412
Wow, this painting is insane. This is all from imagination?

File: BLOEMAERT_Abraham_The_Marriage_Of_Cupid_And_Psyche.jpg (133KB, 919x909px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 919x909px

>>2818412
The marriage of Cupid and Psyche
Bloemaert, Abraham 1564 - 1651

File: pclaesz6.jpg (106KB, 784x436px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 784x436px

>>2818413
The Vanitas style paintings from the early 1600's
They are all allegorical in nature and composition.
Yes insane for sure. Have you studied Pieter Clauesz?

File: greco19.jpg (157KB, 750x588px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 750x588px

>>2818422
And El Greco 1541-1614

File: BAGLIONE_Giovanni_Self_Portrait_With_Vanitas_Symbols.jpg (147KB, 1115x800px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1115x800px

>>2818412
Italian Vanitas painting

File: Psyche_Entering_Cupids_Garden_CGFA.jpg (124KB, 503x800px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 503x800px

>>2818418
John William Waterhouse
Psyche Entering Cupids Gardens

File: Hylas_and_the_Nymphs.jpg (82KB, 800x502px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 800x502px

>>2818447
Hylas and the Nymphs
Another John William Waterhouse piece.

File: Ribera_The_Duel_of_Isabella_de_Carazzi_and_Diambra_de_Pottinella.jpg (83KB, 681x750px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 681x750px

>>2818447
Jusepe de Ribera 1591-1652
The Duel of Isabella de Carazzi and Diambra de Pottnella

>>2803698
>>2803700
sauce?

>>2819018

>>2803698 joseph zbukvic
>>2803700 russell flint

>>2806956
>>2806968
>>2806980
Beauty is a spectrum, not a pyramid.
You can argue an apex chink is more beautiful than an apex nigra because you're a filthy weaboo. But neither stops being beautiful because of your preferences.

On the other hand, you cannot argue a deform pre-plastic surgery south korean is more beautiful than an apex african just because you're racist. That's being intellectually dishonest and a shit artist.

>>2809190
It means the model doesn't have three kilos of arm fat like she does and is driving her mad jelly.

>>2810751
Well, considering he was contemporary to Gibson, Price and Flagg in his youth, Rockwell, Leyendecker, Dohanos, Hughes and Falter in his prime, and Frazetta in his later years. No. Loomis was irrelevant.

He is actually good by today's art history standards but I'd rather look up to anyone else listed above.

>>2819078
is that original size? It's very nice. Is this considered a portrait?