Computer generated art

File: dream_4a7b933024.jpg (89KB, 672x535px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 672x535px

I'll post the others that the algorithm made, this one's also very accurate

pretty cool filter.

File: dream_432e5db398.jpg (77KB, 672x535px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 672x535px

Another one which is scarily good.

I wonder how far they're going to stretch it

I don't get it, how is this different from a shitty instagram filter?

>>2795515
For machines to be able to compete with humans in art at any functional capacity first they'd have to be able to think.
By the time machines are capable of thought job security will be the least of your problems.

>>2795528
Are you blind?

thanks for the link , as usual OP is a tremendous faggot

>>2795521
Plz stop posting

Those actually look like shit, op.

would it be dumb if I use this images made by this program for reference? I was thinking of combining pictures with paintings I enjoy to copy from.

I am not going to post any work I might make from it since I would consider it stealing, but will this somehow cripple me in the long run? I just want to be a better painter.

>>2795545

Am I supposed to be impressed? They look like gimmicky filters and shitty ones at that

we're already post modernism

>>2795521
>>2795517
putting a filter on top of a photo isn't exactly some revolutionary technology.

>>2795515
How is this impressive...?
Its just a bot adding filters of photos.

>>2796118
that's a decent idea, no harm in trying it, it could lead to cool results, or at least, reduce your work time.

also, you probably should install in your own machine the program so you can play with the parameters, instead of using the default ones everytime. most of that shit is open source.

>>2795515

Robots are way more useful, productive and worthy assembling cars than photobashing.

>>2795515
But that looks like shit.
>>2795517
>>2795521
These too. I wouldn't pay anything for them. Like >>2795528
said, this is looks like a shitty filter on instagram or photoshop.

Stop wasting your time and just draw.

Computer alogirthms are getting good, but they're generally derivative pieces rather than creating anything. It's all combination.

Of course artiststic creativity is usually just mashing inspirations together, but they do it in a way that a (modern) algorithm can't.

You could say they put human photocopiers out of a job but seeing as literal photocopiers didn't, I think it'll carry on.

>>2795545

I've seen some good algorithmic stuff, I forget the name of the site that combines an art style with a photo and gets a good result maybe 2 times out of 10 (which isn't bad).

The stuff you provided are basically filters and not that impressive. Easily within the realm of something somebody whose never drawn a day in their life could do in photoshop with a few days practice.

File: draw me like one of your french girls.jpg (38KB, 426x636px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 426x636px

It might be doing some impressive things i doubt that it'll ever be able to acquire that inventive side of art.
I mean yeah it can make a picture of a cat look all trippy but good art tells a story and has a purpose in mind. Also a robot couldn't create an image based on a written description. Art isn't just supposed to just look cool.

File: thumb_img133204_c10ea96f6e8820c1.jpg (100KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 600x600px

those examples look indeed like shitty filters

take this one instead

>>2795515
I don't like the use of space or composition, weird, seems something easy to implement.

File: deepart.jpg (129KB, 577x433px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 577x433px

>>2796935
The source image has a terrible composition, the whole thing would have to be corrected.

Anyways those filters still look like crap this website right here does a much better job of faking art.

https://deepart.io/

File: thumb_img1126595_3c69ba597303623a.jpg (143KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 600x600px

http://ostagram.ru/static_pages/lenta?last_days=30&locale=en

File: flowers.jpg (107KB, 408x612px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 408x612px

this is nice

File: weed.jpg (156KB, 525x475px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 525x475px

kek

https://deepart.io/img/PsyZIirr/