golden ratio canvas size proportions

It won't mean anything if the work inside the canvas doesn't follow the ratio.

Golden ratio is a meme. Stop wasting your time with that dumb garbage.

Personally I think the golden ratio is too big, a slightly smaller one would be more appealing.

>>2743803
clearly one anon on /ic/ knows how the world works and knows more than all the people that came before him who established this whole thing
i swear to god everyone here has a fucking snobby artist complex

>>2743817
then why the fuck you coming here asking us? we don't care about golden ration so buzz off

>>2743765
>would result in more appealing pictures, yes?

No.

Yes, visual variety is a must, as well as a dispersion of visual cues, and the golden ratio details a way that the human eye likes to do it.

But the golden ratio itself is a fucking meme. Half the pictures that it overlays follow in the most threadbare sense, like the apparent focal point will be an ear and you're meant to accept that because it happens to fit there? Bullshit.

Look, use focal points, use visual variety, use eye leading techniques like value and cues, but don't use this formula shit that's just the human brains ability to pull pattern recognition right out of its asshole.

>>2743822
>we

>>2743822
shut the fuck up faggot and go draw furries

>>2743765

Goldem ratio is a meme. You won't make good compositions with it.

File: gyro3.png (97KB, 371x358px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 371x358px

>>2743765
No, but you'll be able to [spoiler] shoot your nails like a pro [/spoiler]

>>2743942
I'm a living failure

>>2743817
Fuck, if you want to use the golden ratio so badly just use it then. It really is nothing more than a meme though.