Does this just straight up seem wrong to anyone else?

File: img_5455.jpg (2MB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x1944px

>>2697545
>Does this just straight up seem wrong to anyone else?
Nope, it's right.

>>2697545
No. It's the most basic thing in perspective and how vision works.

It seems wrong because the earth isn't flat and you can't see detail infinitely into the distance.

It's only a general guideline for imitating the perspective of human sight in a 2D space.

File: perspective-view-of-a-railway-track-and-tunnel-in-rainy-season-near-g1w2a8.jpg (63KB, 640x444px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 640x444px

>>2697545
You need to stand on some straight, long railroad tracks.

File: railroad-tracks.jpg (1008KB, 1308x791px) Image search: [Google]

1008KB, 1308x791px

>>2697555

File: railway-train-tracks-steel-bridge-structure-at-river-crossing-g81tyb.jpg (94KB, 640x447px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 640x447px

>>2697556
Does it seem right to you now OP?

File: country-train.jpg (864KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

864KB, 1280x853px

>>2697558

>>2697554

>It's the most basic thing in perspective and how vision works.

The most basic thing about sight is your retina absorbing photons that have been focused through the imperfect lense of your cornea. In real sight, we focus on a single point in space, and things become progressively less focused the further away we get. We don't encounter this unless we intentionally unfocus our eyes, because otherwise we are constantly refocusing on whatever is in the center of our vision as we scan the world around us.

If you take that an image of railroad tracks and a telephone line are supposed to replicate how we see the world, then yea, that drawing as well as all these images of railroad tracks are completely unlike how it would look if you were actually there. The telephone pole, for instance, would be out of focus if it were actually at the edge of your vision, until you glance at it and your eyes instantly refocus on it.

You would be correct if you said that 1PP is a very slight abstraction that allows us to imitate how objects sit in space, however 1PP shows much higher detail than actual sight, because there is no focusing element.

>>2697591
I wasn't talking about focus or anything. I simply meant that the fact that objects get smaller as they get farther from your eye is a basic component of vision, and that parallel lines converge at a point on the horizon is the most basic component of all linear perspective.

>>2697556
>>2697558
yes desu