Today I'll remind them!

>>2684081
What is the ABC method and why does it not follow value

>>2684096
vkDOTcomSLASHdoc4043932_291971010

>not Loomis
Never gonna make it.

>not Hampton villpu proko ruan jia gesture battle loomis harry potter

Never gonna make it

>>2684100
>This document is available only to its owner.

>>2684108
ups
vkDOTcomSLASHdoc4043932_291971010?hash=d155fb1cadb6c78fdc&dl=9e88c578e304c2b7f0

File: 7 year old.png (300KB, 666x652px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 666x652px

>>2684120
>tfw his 7 year old son is better than 40% of /ic/

>>2684120
>cover looks like shit
I don't know man

>>2684127
He's chinese, it doesn't count.

Can someone who read this give me a tldr of the book? I skimmed it and it looks like its all about finding the main points, making a triangle then refining with smaller triangles?

>>2684081
>>2684127

This can't be real...

>>2684081
Damn wish I could symbol draw that well, no wonder i'll never make it

>>2684127
10/10 next Yoh Yoshinary

whats the abc method?

>>2684389
read the thread nigga

File: polycount.png (191KB, 626x581px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 626x581px

>>2684389
Basically, making a low poly count drawing, then adding more and more until it doesn't look like if PS1 posted on /beg/

>>2684439
You mean like iterative drawing?

>>2684444
Something like that.
Even if you don't use the rules of said book, is kind of fascinating seeing someone aplying these rules in drawing.
Give it a look, at least of curiosity

Looks like they are 2d reference copies with no understanding of form, why is this impressive, someone of any age would be able to do that especially after years.

>>2684488
It sounds kind of a slow technique. Is it beneficial in the long run?

>>2684490
It's a great way to have flat as fuck drawings and only be able to draw from reference

File: hand.png (101KB, 664x265px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 664x265px

>>2684210
>>2684389
Mathematician with a hobby of drawing figures that, since computer rendering works well, humans should draw in the same way.

>>2684506
isn't this just measuring and construction?

>>2684501
Could you possibly recommend an alternate method that is superior and more helpful towards one's artistic development?

>>2684519
i thought that was the one that was just being condemned here

>>2684517
Construction

>>2684525
what kind of construction

>>2684527
No, but I am curious as to what they think is superior, to try and understand their POV, and just to increase my knowledge of the different approaches to judge their merits for myself.

>>2684526
Constructing your drawings out of 3d forms.
Also known as "Read the fucking sticky"

>>2690188
holy kek, those are great

>>2684081
Hey, that's Edward from twilight, and I think see Taylor Swift.

None of these were done from imagination, and because of that it's useless. Might as well be using a grid.

File: 1440260613705.jpg (55KB, 671x900px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 671x900px

>>2684081
>2 years
>this is the result
In two years you can go from basically zero, to painting accurate full on oil portraits. Another meme scam method.

>>2684512
It is, but with it's own gimmick.

File: 1433496394569.jpg (2MB, 1390x1975px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1390x1975px

>>2690258
I'd argue kids are better at learning, provided they're interested in it.

Rembrandt started at 12 and opened a studio at 18.

>>2690228
fat nose

>>2690291
still seems like a pretty legit nose, there's plenty of people who actually have that. Have you ever done a portrait from life?

>>2690291
Good job trying to find a flaw in the image because youre nowhere near that level so you have to try and tear it down. I happen to love big noses, cunt ;)))))))))

ABC method is literally just simplified Bargue course

>>2690291
>tfw my nose looks like that

>>2690291
oy vey, is that a problem?

>>2690222
It's true.
You're not going to be working for Marvel after learning the ABC method, but you will be working on a street corner quickly drawing people for 20$