Hugh Jackman portrait

That's Hugh mess you made thier.
Quit it.

>>2666441
You messed up on the very foundation of your drawing. For now, work on symmetry and proportion.

>>2666441
Loomis & read the beginner sticky

Youre wasting time on rendering when the drawing is super off.

It's a superb drawing. He's done distortion on a purpose, to exaggerate the man's expression and create a dynamic form. It tricks the eye pretty well because it's so skillfully rendered - despite the immense distortion in anatomy - I don't see much wrong with it. It's a matter of style.

Someone manipulate a real life picture of Hugh to look like that art.

>>2666497
Where is "LOOK THROUGH THE EYES OF OP" guy? Fuck! I miss that glorious bastard

learn anatomy, youll be great

>>2666488
dont kno but shading and form nice mmmm distortion seems weird but thats ok

>>2666441
>>2666547

Could someone explain why on the original, even though it is not very good, I could still figure out it was hugh jackman but once its reversed its literally unrecognizable?

Does the artist's perception when he's drawing mistakes also apply to the spectator brain? Or did I just get used to the original really fast ?

>>2667646

Because faces and expressions are assymetrical. Without having studied his face I bet he tends not to raise his other eyebrow as much

>>2667646
I think it might have something to do with 90 percent of people being right handed so we have similar distortions in how we draw and perceive things.