opinions / critiques on the doodle? Thanks a bunch

so cuteee!

>>2646287
one, steady, solid, unbroken line per curve

do you think you could pull that off or are you just gonna chicken scratch more then 2 birds in a cockfight

File: Alan.png (107KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 512x512px

>>2646354
woah, calm down no need for aggresive replies xD
I don't usually go sketchy, that's why I call this a 'doodle'

>>2646374
I can tell you're not from around here.

Trust me, OP. That reply isn't even close to the venom we usually dish out.

But he's right, even a doodle should have good lines, shitty lines breeds bad habits.

Don't hide behind, "I wasn't really trying" or "that took me like 5 minutes." Those lines in your original pic aren't good, simple as that. You've shown that you could do better, so hold yourself at a higher standard.

Please, don't make your own thread next time. You'll get better critiques in the stylization thread. >>2645244

>>2646416
Stop shilling that vid mang

>>2646408
Yeah, first time around here, I was just introduced to the board.

thanks for the advice and notice on the thread-thingie, I'll keep it in mind for next time

>>2646427

As a general rule for /ic/ and 4chan in general, it's advisable you avoid posting for a little bit to see what the board is like and get a feel for its unwritten rules.

People who make their own threads asking for critique on a single piece - especially one they openly admit they didn't try that hard on - get shit on pretty consistently here.

Also if you think that guy's reply was aggressive you're in for a wild time, people on this board like to bury a little dash of valid critique in a very thick layer of shit-talk.

>>2646447
This.

If you can't handle the venom or the bantz, /ic/ isn't the right place for you.

>>2646287
you shoulda posted this in the stylization thread. it's cute though.