Can we all agree this kinda art which may sell for thousands is fucking dumb. all they did was throw paint at paper or some shit. No "there's deeper meaning" shit
you're just ignorant
keep being jelly when you didnt afford art school. I bet youre mad because my art will sell for six figures after I finish all the courses of modern art
>>2632890
wow, it sells for thousands
>it looks so easy mimii it must be dumb
you should try to paint like that then you will see that the dumb one are you
I bet 2000 bucks that you will not produce a painting like that in years
>>2632890
If it's so easy why don't you do it?
>>2632890
ITT : Trolls
>>2632890
Why again do you estimate artistic value of the piece buy its price? Why those things should be correlated in the first place?
>>2632890 (OP)
Agreed, but comparing that shit to a Pollock would be like comparing a thrift store landscape to John Constable.
Also, Pollock wasn't concerned with "muh deeper meaning", it was literally about paint on a canvas. You are responding to the meme that abstract art must be some deep philosophical shit rather than actually learning about the intentions of the abstract artists you whine about. That's the definition of willful ignorance.
>>2633018
couldnt agree more. The best non representational art is the one that just tries too look compelling.
>>2632890
The only problem I have is that the rise of low-tier weed-smoking abstract artists makes people forget the importance of classical art education. People not passing on the legacy of the old masters would be a catastrophe.