[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

What makes classic artwork so much better than modern artwork?

This is a red board which means that it's strictly for adults (Not Safe For Work content only). If you see any illegal content, please report it.

Thread replies: 37
Thread images: 12

File: classic v modern.png (2MB, 1590x868px) Image search: [Google]
classic v modern.png
2MB, 1590x868px
What makes classic artwork so much better than modern artwork?
>>
>>2617914
What makes your opinion more important than others?
>>
>posting images of post-modern illustration
>think he knows what 'classic' and 'modern' entails
>>
>>2617914
Nostalgia.
>>
>>2617914
looks both like shit and none of those are "classic" artwork.
>>
>>2617914
I like modern artwork more.
>>
>>2617914
the old masters theory rule.
>>
>>2617914
I think it's the color values, M&L looks kinda dead.
But M&L style has the better illustrations, so just give it World colors and it would be better.
>>
>>2617914
nostalgia goggles
>>
File: small.png (2MB, 982x1020px) Image search: [Google]
small.png
2MB, 982x1020px
>>2617914
not necessarily when its done but rather how many times its re done. the first drawing carries all the personality because it was made from the ground up where as the second is just an analysis of the first so the spirit is gone.
>>
Shit taste.
>>
>>2617914
Survival bias.
Most art at any point in time sucks. Only some of it is good and memorable. The memorable stuff gets remade, again with the same odds of sucking, so only some of it measures up to the original.

The shitty art won't get remembered for the most part.
>>
File: 1457691302479.jpg (71KB, 564x820px) Image search: [Google]
1457691302479.jpg
71KB, 564x820px
>>2617914
The use of colors. Modern art tends to be over rendered/ Try slightly too hard to be more realistic or "accurate".
>>
>>2618638
>>2619227
>>2618196
all of these
>>
>>2619232

Source?
>>
>>2617915
When one opinion is closer to being right than the other opinion that opinion becomes more important
>>
traditional media.
seriously, the point at which pokemon art went from the original watercolor pieces to digital was when it started sucking.
>>
>>2620368
This was also reflected in Gen 3 designs.
>>
>>2620368
This, but
>>2620514
This is when it was between good and bad.
Gen 3 was the last gen to not only use the old style, pic related, the updated design was still faithful to the classic design and it still had some "badassery" to it still, pic related in next replry.
>>
>>2620744
>Pic related
Really, Gen 5 was when everything went from "seriously and determined" to "happy and generic chimpmunk smile for all the girl characters, even in their remakes, it just looks bad and Pokemon began looking nothing like "animalistic monsters" and now look like fucking rubber duck toys.
>>
File: brendan_may_emerald.png (114KB, 378x309px) Image search: [Google]
brendan_may_emerald.png
114KB, 378x309px
>>2620747
Forgot pic.
>>
>>2620748
Edgy and serious

>>2620744
Happy fun time adventures for kids 15 and below.
>>
>>2620747
>now look like fucking rubber duck toys.
Psyduck is almost literally a rubber duck.
>>
>>2620764
No. No "Kawaii buck tooth smile like pic related.
Guys doing that is called a "shit eating grin", see Adventure series Sonic. Pic related is a "Happy fun time adventures for kids 10 and below." FTFY btw.
>>2620789
Psy is "almost" a platypus, as he's based on. He's not a duck.

>>2620368
Anon here is correct.
>>
>>2620821
That May is more "happy and fun adventures in bed, and the kitchen, and the shower..."
>>
File: 1371214730-shauna-official-art.jpg (319KB, 614x1157px) Image search: [Google]
1371214730-shauna-official-art.jpg
319KB, 614x1157px
>>2620747
>happy and generic chimpmunk smile for all the girl characters
This is the pinnacle of bad design in my eyes.
>>
>>2618638
AAAargh. Not even a Dragon Quest fan but I like Toryama. The top one is looks like butchered fanart. It's like I can't even tell which direction his body is facing if I don't look at the arms.
>>
File: 1460598032683.gif (999KB, 470x353px) Image search: [Google]
1460598032683.gif
999KB, 470x353px
The only thing you can keep in mind is the fact that basic rules of ascetic rule the art world. When making the skills of the artist completely level, obviously at a professional level, the only. Change should be in slight cultural changes, so far this has only happened a few times sence humans walk the earth. These huge changes are the only ones worth mentioning, the rest are simply banal
>>
File: Ruby_Sapphire_Flannery.png (1MB, 952x1209px) Image search: [Google]
Ruby_Sapphire_Flannery.png
1MB, 952x1209px
>muh classic pokémon art
>/ic/ will defend this
>>
File: b5a.jpg (23KB, 255x222px) Image search: [Google]
b5a.jpg
23KB, 255x222px
>Pokemon was so determinated, now they look too happy. it seems like kiddie stuff
Are you guys for real.
From all the things to criticize like the use of colors that don't contrast and don't blend well in the characters, the over-designing of others, or designs that don't resemble their type, you had to go for "they are not as bad-ass",
Go back to rob-liefeld or watch blade. Edgy/happy/whatever tone their are going for =/= quality.
>>2621340
Fuck you Satoshi Urushihara art is gorgeous
>>
>>2622411
> She's overpopular, so it must be a meme!
Just stay mad in a corner, buddy.
>>
>>2623027
What the fuck does that even have to do with anything.
>>
File: 1464651811214.jpg (6KB, 251x176px) Image search: [Google]
1464651811214.jpg
6KB, 251x176px
>>2625007
> Replying to a 2 day post.
How cute.
>>
>>2617914
M+L is leagues better. The one on the left looks like it belongs on some cheap VHS cover.
>>
>>2625025
Slow boards exist, you know?
>>
File: 1458506481389.jpg (50KB, 960x864px) Image search: [Google]
1458506481389.jpg
50KB, 960x864px
>>2625918
And yet that keeps me from replying to your post 28 mins later instead.
>>
>>2617914
old one done by a Japanese artist,
new one done by millenial Tumblrerer
Thread posts: 37
Thread images: 12


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.