why are so many porn artists so good

Really? Haven't ever seen any good artists that does porn.

>>2607864

40ish year old men with years of experience.

To do porn well you have to be good at drawing, know your anatomy and know how to stylise intelligently. There are no shortcuts or tricks, either you can draw well you you can't. Poorly drawn porn is also far more embarrassing to produce and look at than regular drawings in my experience.

Paul Richards is someone who is very upfront about his erotic work and also works on games like Halo.

>>2607864
Just because you draw porn doesn't mean you're a porn artist. Most artists that focus on porn aren't that good DESU. The porn market has pretty low standards in terms of what's actually fappable. But there are plenty of good artists that also happen to draw porn on the side.

It's like natural selection. Only the good porn artists will be noticed and be popular, so to be good you have to be very good at anatomy or people's dicks will feel weird when they're fapping. That's why being good at anatomy is good for a porn artist, good porn artists arYOU GET THE IDEA.

>>2607864
She is unbelievably disproportioned

>>2607931
Are you retarded?

>>2607944
Yeah

File: 1439661242401.png (410KB, 460x627px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 460x627px

Because porn artists have to draw anatomy all the time, they bruteforce git gud.

>>2607967

Porn also forces you to draw interacting figures in all sorts of weird entangled positions which means lots of foreshortening and challenging drawing problems. You also have to think a lot about angles and composition so the naughty bits aren't obscured. I see a lot of people pretty much just draw single figures posing with a gun merc wip style

>>2608009
>Porn also forces you to draw interacting figures in all sorts of weird entangled positions which means lots of foreshortening and challenging drawing problems.

This isn't exclusive to porn so I don't see why you're mentioning that. Comics and other brands of illustrations do the same thing. It sounds like all you do is look at porn if you honestly came to that conclusion.

>>2607944
No, you are.
The photo is shooped you idiot, >>2607931 is right.

>>2607931
Shit anatomy lmao
Need fuckin loomis

>>2608013

Sure but it tends to do so more than any other form of illustration and by it's very nature it is obviously heavily focused on anatomy. I wasn't making the argument that it is the only or necessarily the "best" way to get good at those things, but it is a way. Relax buddy.

>>2608066
>Sure but it tends to do so more than any other form of illustration and by it's very nature it is obviously heavily focused on anatomy.

But even this still is incorrect. The only thing different about porn from other illustrations is the subject matter, not the amount of knowledge needed to do it well. A lot of porn gets a pass on shit anatomy because it gives people a boner.

>>2607931
She's unbelievably shooped.

>>2608041
No shit, you moron.

>>2608059
Her proportions look alright to me. What's wrong with her?

>>2608254
Look at the actual image anon. You can see the warping around the waist line and hips.

>>2608258
I know it's shopped, but looking at just the lines, is the anatomy off?

>tries to draw amazon futas fucking for 40+ pages.
>fails to see why kids love the taste of cinnamon toast toast
>an hero
>reborn as bear condom in yaoi heaven.
>is homophobic
>mfw doesn't wipe


Being obsessive about a fetish gives you enough motivation to practice it until you get it right every fucking time.

File: hoo.jpg (87KB, 385x367px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 385x367px

>>2608009
>merc wip
gets me every time