Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 7
Thread images: 7
Anonymous
no love for vargas??? 2016-07-10 19:17:06 Post No. 2596677
[Report] Image search: [Google]
no love for vargas??? 2016-07-10 19:17:06 Post No. 2596677
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: alberto-vargas-pin-up-art49.jpg (46KB, 828x569px) Image search:
[Google]
46KB, 828x569px
What the fuck \ic\... no love for vargas. all you fucks drawing hot girls and shit. this guys my man, i am inspired by this glorious bastard.
i've never seen anybody even mention him?? why?
>>
File: vargas8.jpg (25KB, 442x550px) Image search:
[Google]
25KB, 442x550px
vargas bumb
>>
>>2596677
the football player? didnt know he can paint huehue
i found her attractive until i noticed her fucked up nipples, are they supposed to be inverted? worst fetish
>>
>>2596677
Elvgren is much better
>>
File: alberto_vargas_04d.jpg (54KB, 990x535px) Image search:
[Google]
54KB, 990x535px
>>2596693
>Elvgren
i agree, when it comes to facial structure, for some reason vargas has a tendency to guy up the girls faces, but the body and the rendering of the skin is way better than elvgren!
>>
File: Now Thats the Way to Play Leapfrog by Alberto Vargas.jpg (80KB, 792x549px) Image search:
[Google]
80KB, 792x549px
bump
>>
File: Gil_Elvgren_04-1.jpg (513KB, 1278x1600px) Image search:
[Google]
513KB, 1278x1600px
>>2596697
>the body and the rendering of the skin is way better than elvgren
Not.even.close.
>>
>>2596717
are your eyes broken?.?.. look at the legs. they do not give the impression of being very well rendered, unless you see it from afar!. compared to any of the pics i posted (despite size differences) there is clearly a difference of clarity!
>>
File: gauguin feet.jpg (624KB, 2672x1568px) Image search:
[Google]
624KB, 2672x1568px
>>2596728
gauguin feet
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 7
Thread images: 7