Is there something wrong with these proportions

>>2410386
his right leg should rotate more outwards so it matches the foot.

And the whole figure is a lil bit tilted to the right so it looks unbalanced.

>>2410390
fuck i can't read.
Propotions seem fine

no dick

awesome critique thanks

They are idealised proportions. Good for drawing Greek Gods or Biblical figures, if you're trying to draw an average Joe then refer to Loomis for a different scale.

>>2410410
Yeah I know but something seems odd about the abdominal area.. but maybe its just because he has a 4 pack rather than 6

>>2410414

I think it's probably the way he has drawn the ribcage, coupled with low lat insertions it kind of gives him a barrel looking torso, he does have big abs as well I can't really say it's wrong but for my own taste I think smaller abs and a smaller waist look better. looking at it though the top pair of abs are taller than the bottom pair and that does look a bit strange. I mean this is Hogarth right? he's not exactly known for anatomical accuracy it's much more stylized, if you want accurate look into Hampton.

>>2410426
Thanks man, that's what I noted as well. I agree it's stylized a lot but I cannot exactly point why all the time.

>>2410386
elbow on left side of drawing is angled out weird.

>>2410386
looks ok

>>2410386
Dick's too small.

File: Anatomy_Height_Study-Male_6ft.jpg (166KB, 889x1200px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 889x1200px

>>2410386

better than %70 of d/ic/ks