What do you think about it?

>>2390111
Is that Emma Watson?

>>2390111
Pretty good.

Looks a lot like Emma Watson though.

>>2390111
bump

I like it.

>>2390111
i think it's so bad even non-artists will notice.

nah nothing is that bad.

if it's yours you need to work on literally everything about depicting mass. and perhaps read something, probably something for filmmakers or photographers about how to use lighting properly.

very promising though, keep it up.

>>2390677
It is not mine, I was curious what /ic/ thinks of it because it seems like a solid piece of art for me. I agree on the lighting part, it could have been done better.

Artist is Feihong Chen https://www.artstation.com/artist/feihongchen

Better than anything /ic/ has ever made.
And still, barely pro-level.

>>2390677
FUCKING KEK YOU DELUSIONAL DISCONNECTED NECKBEARDED FUCKING RETARD

>>2390687
> solid piece of art for me

It is. If you're curious what /ic/ thinks, keep in mind that the people on this board are incredibly misguided and arrogant.

>>2390677
i mean fuck, i cant believe there are people like you

>>2393568
Define "pro-level", anon

>>2393852
tracing and photobashing :^)

>>2393852
Getting steady comissioned work from fortune 1000 companies.

>>2394421
How to achieve that?

>>2394421

Funny, I thought a professional was someone who made a living on their skill, period.

>>2394435
Some places (like the Graphic Artist Guild for example) might consider you a pro if more than 50% of your income is made from art. Too many people on IC think unless you look like "x" artist you're not "pro level".

>>2394421
If people make a living from their art no matter the skill level they're professional. The term "pro level" is subjective and doesn't really mean anything outside the niche amateur online art world.

The gauge of "pro" level work also has a lot to do with what field you work in, Editorial or Children's book illustrations are still "pro" even if they don't look like mullins. (Despite what many people on here seem to think.)

File: 1448839859304.gif (2MB, 355x262px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 355x262px

>>2390111
The legs look weird, nice trips btw

>>2390111

Value/color contrast is a little harsh but pretty good

>>2390111
Pretty cool.

>i-is that torch photobashed? ....why?

Nice!
Love it, love the Witcher. Mind if I save?

>>2397135
No, you cant save it. Sorry.

>>2390111

The funny thing is all the butthurt newfags here don't realise but this dude is probably better than 99.9% of /ic/