You know the drill.
a few to get it rolling
>>2779133
The more mega+ Kate Beckinsale the better desu
>>2779488
The Old Thread is dead!
LONG LIVE THE THREAD!
Blessed be the Based Slug, bringer of rad collages
>>2779134
the airplane above her right nipple though
>>2779691
>>2779692
>>2779693
>>2779694
>>2779696
>>2779697
>>2779699
>>2779700
So, are we gonna talk about how AnAlternateUsername made a straight up Kaiju movie? Fucking radical desu
>>2779700
Read that as "Swatting immigrant" for a second and was pretty amused.
Someone explain this fetish to me, please.
I can kind of understand shit like armpits and feet if I strain really hard, but what's the appeal of city-sized women? Is this like a vore-type thing, where the imagery of having your body horribly mutilated and crushed is somehow arousing?
How do you fuck a 2km tall woman?
>>2780772
>How do you fuck a 2km tall woman?
get a bigger dick?
>>2780772
>Someone explain this fetish to me, please.
Why do you care?
>>2780772
Not this anon, but would also like the explanation.
Genuinely curious and interested.
>>2780928
You seriously can't comprehend why someone would find something or a scenario arousing if you can't put your dick in it?
So you're telling me you don't understand the very concept of a fetish? Go fuck yourself.
>>2780772
I'm guessing your 'understanding' of feet is based entirely on the fact that you can get a footjob.
>>2780937
Never said anything about dick being or not being involved having anything to do with what I'm asking about. I know that fetishes are a very personal thing, but there's no need for hostility.
>>2780948
Powerful women. A giant woman is a woman so powerful that she can do whatever she wants. What you want doesn't matter to her at all.
If a giant woman thinks the only thing you're good for is being eaten, you can't stop her. If she thinks it'd be funny to crush you and the city you live in, what are you going to do about it? Nothing. That's sexy.
Not really into it as a fetish personally. Just kinda neat, monster movie type deal.
>>2780904
I want to /r/ more giant Sara Underwood for forever
>>2780991
As someone who has the fetish this is also a major aspect to me. The aesthetics/compositions can be really fun on their own right. I bet money most people posting here are fans of kaiju/giant robots too.
Bigger versions of things are just compelling imho.
For the anon that requested her last thread.
>>2783086
NY ist mirror inverted!
>>2783622
>The fuck is this cartoon shit
hi res giant girls
The girls are OK but the idea is stupid
>>2783795
The idea?
>>2783795
this complaint must computer illiterate, these images are fantastic, in time and effort spent compiling such, they shows his/her abilities.... (sorry dude just being a-political), typically this hater Is just jealous...
highres
>>2783732
Are you dense?
>>2784387
what's the problem?
Hello! Have a safety bump/dump with content. MY content! I've got a few more on my deviantart, but i havent done anything new in a while.
these gts threads have been great the past few months. still, i enjoy my giant women around this size
this one gained views pretty fast.
ive got a better one of her but its too small to post here
>>2785978
Where is her shadow?
>>2785997
i didnt bother to look up tutorials on shadows or reflections. it seemed like a lot of work, so none of mine have shadows. maybe i'll remaster them should i get better with gimp
>>2785999
Shadows are a crucial part and can be done in very few seconds.
>>2785999
So what you're saying is you fucked up and decided to post it anyways?
>>2780911
because you looks like a fucking retard
>>2787708
Um, no?
>>2787709
Um, yes.
>>2788895
Not really.
More content please
>>2789419
>>2789425
>>2789432
gigantic bitches are going to take over
>>2790065
We can only hope.
Reviving tired bread with a classy find -
>>2791937
Fuck you too bud.
Here'a a docop
bump
anybody got any requests?
>>2794497
Jane Levy? She's a tiny sometimes redhead, so that would be great. Not sure if there are any good enough photos of her out there though.
>>2794497
How about some giant Willa Holland?
>>2794605
Here you go, had a bit of fun with this one. I found some other pictures that might work, too, so I'll give those a whirl sometime.
>>2795452
Sure thing.
>>2795529
>Sure thing.
I'm preparing my dick.
>>2795540
doubt your dick can handle regular Willa. Zilla Willa is a dicktastrophe
>>2795529
Another fantastic collage, you're getting the hang of it.
>>2797147
>>2797150
>>2797154
anyone got requests? have no imagination t b h
>>2781016
thissssss
>>2797182
Willa was already mentioned
>>2798023
i don't care. this pictures are stupid and u know that. do you?
>>2798023
I know, he's on a mission to make giantess collaging great again and it's the greatest thing ever :D
>>2795540
Tried something a little different with this one, hope you like it, anon.
>>2797926
No reason we can't have more requests :)
>>2798670
Very nice. Tonight, I fap well.
Requesting a large Ali Larter please!
>>2797926
This one is really clever.
Requesting Abbi Jacobson
>>2799655
And Ilana Glazer
anyone got more of girls in the middle of growing or reacting to their growth?
el bumpio
>>2802573
This is lovely!
>>2799649
Yo post more requests nigz. Sophie? KStew? Titwell, Grimes, Chrvches girl, Lizfu?
>>2803567
I mean, since you asked...
Agnetis Miracle
Alexandra Daddario
Anna Kendrick
Charlotte McKinney
Emma Roberts
Ewa Sonnet
Heidi Montag
Jana Defi
Jordan Carver
Karlie Kloss
Kate Beckinsale
Kelly Brook
Kim Kardashian
Maria Sharapova
Sara Underwood
>>2802665
way 2 big
>>2803943
wat
>>2803909
And Wendy Fiore
>>2803945
The little guy is way too big
>>2804027
autism
Just say you likem small
like your penis
A large Liz Vicious would be nice...
OC
>>2804233
>>2804279
>>2804284
>filename
>Toronto
Nigga, that's not Toronto. That looks like something from Asia... then again, that's essentially Toronto anyways.
>>2804317
hahaha, I just went off the filename for the bg.
but thanks tho. I shoulda known :F
wow what a beautyful pussy
>>2804086
Man... might have to take a crack at that. Haven't heard that name in a while
>>2804079
My penis is so small that it's called a clitoris
>>2803567
More titwell would always be appreciated
>>2804457
It's difficult to do that woman justice.
I've got a few stuck in draft stage :/
>>2804429
This is really well done.
>>2805211
Yeah pusherman is an artist.
Go watch him
http://imyourpusherman.deviantart.com/
>>2805254
>>2805305
>>2803567
Is there any of Grimes? I wouldn't mund seeing something done withTatiana Maslany.
>>2779133
Can someone pls explain: WHY is this a thing?
>>2805475
You sound like you're 13 years old.
>>2805480
Well, to a 13yo who hasn't developed their maturity, such as yourself, I guess I might
And I don't hear an answer in your reply.
>>2805348
she's so lovely
>>2805475
Just read through tge answers to when this was previously asked; >>2780928
Personally, I view it very much part of a powerplay thing. A woman so big that she can literally do whatever she wants to the world. Bored? Crush a few buildings. Hungry? Scoop up and eat some people. Horny? Use a building as a makeshift dildo etc.
>>2805813
>>2805480
If you're gonna reply to bait on /gts/, at least have some sick pix
>>2805471
4U
Grimes is hard to get good photos of!
Sorry for the hold up. Sources tell me it's being worked on...
>>2805813
Oh yeah, and get this as an answer:
>You seriously can't comprehend why someone would find something or a scenario arousing if you can't put your dick in it? So you're telling me you don't understand the very concept of a fetish? Go fuck yourself.
and
>imagine a girl you find attractive. now imagine theres MORE of her.
Trolling and "bigger-is-better". Seriously?
And others have replied:
>Why do you care?
>I'm guessing your 'understanding' of feet is based entirely on the fact that you can get a footjob.
About the only person who answered was this: >>2780932
>I don't find much of this a fetish, more entertaining
See, this I get: as a shoop thread, it's like /s/ but bigger. And I see the appeal of women in ANY situation, and the amusement to be had of colossus-women smashing up the city.
But that's not what some here claim it is, some are saying it's a fetish, that they get off on this, and fuck me if that doesn't just sound dumb. Feet, yep, okay, not my thing, but I get how that can be a fetish. Bdsm, sure, I can understand it. But, this just seems like someone is havin' a laugh and I'm not in on the joke.
MOST importantly, if this were a legit fetish, there'd be porn of it. No, I mean, there would be dozens of porn websites devoted to the topic, making money off fetishists devoted to enormous women. Cuz, where there's fetish, there's money to be made, no? And yet... the only place is deviant art which doesn't qualify as "Yay, I'm, making money from it" like normie porn sites do.
So I ask, get trolled, get agro' responses, get accused of b8, and wait until the next thread to ask again hoping there are more patiently intelligent posters joining /hr/. This will be the fifth time we have done this and we are getting exceedingly efficient at it.
>>2806234
Leave.
>>2806234
>MOST importantly, if this were a legit fetish, there'd be porn of it. No, I mean, there would be dozens of porn websites devoted to the topic, making money off fetishists devoted to enormous women.
Uhh, those sites *do* exist, there are quite a few of them. Heck, all of the largest/famous size fetish websites (Giantess City, Giantess Booru, Giantess Love, Giantess Katelyn, etc) are either store fronts, exist as soft advertising for a store front, and/or heavily advertise paid content for revenue. It sounds like you've not even spent 10 seconds Googling the fetish. DA is hardly representative of the fetish's wider "community". Even here on 4chan there are persistent size threads on multiple boards (/d/ and /aco/, as the main examples).
Otherwise, theres not much more to say. It kinda sucks that others in this thread are being a bit dickish to outsider questions, but you don't really seem that interested in actually trying to understand the fetish either. If arguments like "more of a good thing" and "an extreme form of power play", etc, aren't doing it for you, there's probably not much point moving forward. Fetishes are fairly irrational to begin with, that's kinda the point, so it's unlikely that anyone is going to rationalise you into "getting it". It is what it is.
>>2806234
>>2806250
This anon has it right. It's just some weird quirck in our sexuality. Fetishes don't make sense.
For instance, you mention 'getting' the foot fetish. I can't fathom it. Feet gross me out to no end. Same with stuff like scat or any number of weird shit.
Everyone's gonna have a different reason/kink, just happening to result in a thing for giant women.
As for people being dicks or rude about it, imo that's a response to the fact that our 'community' has been underground for a while now. Given that the fetish is basically excluded from the canon of acceptable kinks (feet, bdsm, etc.) many of us have gotten used to constantly answering these questions and being mocked/heckled in response.
>t. Macrophile
>>2806065
Nice man! Wish I had something to give back.
Less bickering more biggering!
>>2803567
I have a request. Can you do some of Asuka, please?
>>2806533
Not him but I found this on the booru
>>2806462
Agreed! Sharing one from based Kosmita
>>2806761
Shame about her legs
Taylor Momsen tho
Theresa Ortiz And Friend
>>2809608
You lost, senpai?
>>2806372
>Given that the fetish is basically excluded from the canon of acceptable kinks (feet, bdsm, etc.)
Au contraire!!
I find this to be THE tamest and most socially acceptable fetish bar none! There's almost no nudity, it's not sexually explicit (at least not here; yes, I know it can be) and the focus is simply NOT on the sexual nature of the enjoyment. Like, feet fetishists cum on feet, bdsm is all about fucking inert bodies that can't resist -- there's a sexual element around which the fetish revolves.
This can have one, too, but it's not a prerequisite. It's frankly more a "colossal women admiration club" than fetish.
And THAT is what fascinates me about it and why I keep asking why this is a thing.
>>2809608
Zoom in
>>2810302
As I said in my previous post on the issue, I think you've just not actually put enough time into actually exploring the wider fetish (or fetishes/kinks in general, to be honest).
To use your own example against you, foot fetishism isn't inherently sexually explicit either. They're just feet, someone with a foot fetish simply gets turned on by them. It's not about *cumming* on feet (although it's something many of them like to do), it's simply about being *attracted* to them.
The same is true of the size fetishes. We're attracted to the size difference, even if it isn't inherently sexually explicit. But many (most?) of us *do* frequently think about in a sexual way. Do you think these people just happen to be collaging beautiful young celebrities by accident? Or is it because they're attracted to them? What's more, these types of celebrity collages aren't exactly representative of the wider community - go on pretty much any of the most popular size fetish websites and you'll find all sorts of collages/illustrations/stories about giant women fucking buildings, stuffing tiny men down their underpants, etc.
There are fetishes surrounding all manner of non-sexually explicit activities or body parts/types. Sneezing, burping, farting, being over-weight, feet, hands, etc, etc. I think it's a little odd that you don't appear confused about this sort of stuff, while simultaneously getting confused about a fetish that can be easily thought of as an extreme form of BDSM, which you're already on board with. I guess I'm still just confused by your confusion.
>>2810302
hey, as someone who's responsible for this series of collage threads being active, that's totally down to my preference.
Go to >>>/d/ and you'll fine explicit stuff or >>>/aco/
I like some stuff that's tame. So do a couple other people. Big whoop. But I know for a fact that it's not representative of the wider fascination. That post you mentioned is evidence of that!
Be the change you want to see. But as long as I and similar minded folks are posting, it seems you're gonna remain befuddled ;)
>>2799655
>>2799764
>>2803567
>>2805471
Might make another one with a better picture.
>>2806533
I'll try to make one soon, anon.
>>2810610
>They're just feet, someone with a foot fetish simply gets turned on by them. It's not about *cumming* on feet
Ugh, I just KNEW if I used an example SOMEONE would use it to undermine my entire argument.
>Sneezing, burping, farting, being over-weight, feet, hands, etc, etc. I think it's a little odd that you don't appear confused about this sort of stuff,
I don't see any "Sneezing, burping, farting, being over-weight, feet, hands, etc, etc" threads on /hr/, so I have no reason to ask them about their stuff.
And neither would I be asking in here, now would I?
>while simultaneously getting confused about a fetish that can be easily thought of as an extreme form of BDSM, which you're already on board with.
That's because I do not see the connection. I mean, I do, I know where you're going with it -- big woman, you cannot resist her domination... -- but I will again, at risk of being mocked for giving another example, a la my foot fetish example, restate that while bondage fetishists are varied in their tactics, there remains a strong sexual "flavour" (fuck it, let's use weasel words) in BDSM, even if no one _actually_ orgasms.
There is no such thing here.
>I guess I'm still just confused by your confusion.
And so, I guess, it will remain, because every example I use to describe a "sexual"-ness to this or that fetish, you're apparently going to provide singular counter-examples to "prove" my argument wrong. I guess two can play at that by resorting to the "porn of it" argument, wherein I point out the lack of money-making sites devoted to this fetish as evidence of its mass psychosexual power. Where there's money to be made, it's because sex. No money, no mass sexual appeal. Ergo, I think I am perfectly rational in asking what the deal is.
But, fine, whatever. Hug a rainbow, or, in your case, be dropped into the underwear of a 500-foot tall Grimes.
She IS still pretty, tho.
>>2810551
apologies desu. That's what I get for being easily distracted. :^)
>>2811269
There are definitely sites out there anon. I just think that the weirdness is macrophilia's over representation online. Personally I think us size weirdoes are much more prevalent online than IRL.
Personally I don't get why people get defensive/rude in opposing you. I think curiousity is only natural from the outside looking in.
Anyway, here's a collage of Alizeé by the very talented RedCoffee.
>>2811269
>Ugh, I just KNEW if I used an example SOMEONE would use it to undermine my entire argument.
Uh, then why did you use an example you knew was naff?
>I don't see any "Sneezing, burping, farting, being over-weight, feet, hands, etc, etc" threads on /hr/, so I have no reason to ask them about their stuff.
I think you missed my point. You were talking about how weird you thought this fetish is simply because it's not explicitly sexual. So I provided a list of other common fetishes that are similarly not explicitly sexual.
>... at risk of being mocked for giving another example ...
To be clear, I wasn't "mocking" you for your past example. It was just odd that you were waxing on about how the size fetishes weren't explicitly sexual, while simultaneously using foot fetishism as an example of a fetish you "got". Neither are explicitly sexual.
> ... there remains a strong sexual "flavour" (fuck it, let's use weasel words) in BDSM, even if no one _actually_ orgasms.
>There is no such thing here.
Well, honestly, I'm not sure what to say other than I don't think you're paying enough attention to the wider community. Pic related.
If this were a BDSM thread, 99% of the photos would just be women tied up, covered in leather. Maybe a few images of women being whipped. If you were being consistent, you'd be questioning where all the explicitly sexual acts were in these images.
For an earlier example, there are at least two foot fetish threads on /hr/ right now. There's very little nudity in those threads, nor are the pictured feet constantly soaked in cum. Hell, *this* thread already contains more sexual material than any of the /hr/ feet threads.
And to use an example outside of the "fetish" context, /hr/ is full of female celebrity threads. Despite the threads being largely non-sexual in nature, why do you think people are posting in them?
Something can be sexually appealing without being explicitly sexual in nature. This is entirely uncontroversial.
1/2
>>2811269
> ... every example I use to describe a "sexual"-ness to this or that fetish, you're apparently going to provide singular counter-examples to "prove" my argument wrong.
Uhh, isn't that an entirely appropriate form of debate? The core premise of your argument is based on something that doesn't even hold in your own examples, hence my pointing it out. Further, I've not been posting "singular" counter-examples, I've named a fair swath of fetishes that are similarly not explicitly sexual in nature. You've merely sidestepped this point.
> ... wherein I point out the lack of money-making sites devoted to this fetish ...
I addressed this days ago in >>2806250. Loads of these websites *do* exist. Again, if you're genuinely curious, I'd invite you to actually take a look around the wider size fetish community. Like I said previously, these /hr/ threads are hardly representative.
So my confusion remains - I'm still not sure where your objection is coming from with all this.
2/2
>>2811554
You really need to stop humoring this faggot.
>>2811559
Probably. I just think his position - if it really *is* his position - is kinda odd. I've seen lots of discussions among people who don't "get" the fetish, but I don't think I've seen anyone holding so steadfastly to some "it's weird because it's not explicitly sexual" position.
Without wanting to sound too dismissive, my assumption is that the guy made his argument without really thinking it through, and is now merely doubling down using, as he freely admits, weasel words: "These other fetishes might not be sexually explicit either ... but they still kinda feel like they have a sexual *flavor* about them!"
Someone please do a big Taytay please.
you even have the picture ready
>>2811984
I'm with this guy. Not that big a fan of girls bigger than a city.
>>2811176
Thanks. I love it.
>>2811559
It feels good when the autist can't even reply to my post. Don't take that away from me! It's all I have left! ;-;
Can anyone do Rebel Wilson?
>>2812013
nice, got a source on that one?
A bit of a quickie. Might have one or two more to post in the next week or so.
>>2815705
That's one hell of a drop off, wierdo.
>>2813663
I don't have the stomach for that.
Here's her attempt to look like Brie Larson
>>2816585
:(
Despair, my only friend
>>2812015
np
>>2806533
Here you go.
>>2804457
>>2803567
More OC
>>2816803
Good work. Working on some OC but I'm a scrub so it's taking forever.
Till then here's Wonderslug
:^)
Another, probably my last before Christmas.
I remember someone in one of the previous threads asked for some Comicbookgirl19 stuff. Hope you like it!
>>2817661
As one of those people from that thread, yes. Yes I do. Execution is on point.
Merry Christmas my dude!
Fresh
Merry Christmas, smallfags ^_^
>>2791231
Can't you read?
It's a giant GIRLS thread.
>>2791231
more?
>>2820679
Definitely not!
kindly requesting giant star wars actresses. daisy ridley, felicty jones. thanks in advance!
>>2821365
Not much, but I found one by thatguy205 that's pretty nice. My OC is still very WIP.
Gonna scrounge up some of Daisy Ridley from RedCoffee too in case you haven't seen em.
Merry Christmas my dudes!
>>2821631
2/3
>>2821650
3/3
RedCoffee be praised <3
Anything of Ellie Kemper out there? Or anyone willing to make something?
Santa didn't deliver the 250+ 10000x10000 perfect quality images of all my favourite giant wimmin, lads. Next year.
>>2824206
Help me senpaitachi. Apart from Kimmy Schmidt, who's a good meme lady to photoshop?
>>2824206
Bumping with Wonderslug <3
>>2824411
Not that anon, but I'd do unspeakable things to see collages of Stefanie Joosten in my lifetime. She's too damn cute!
Pic related
>>2824490
2/3 There's just so little in the way of useable pics for her desu
>>2824492
3/3
But if you want to try - have at it :^)
>>2824495
I lied. One more and I'll stop shitting up the thread.
>>2824411
I'd second Kimmy, honestly. Other than her I''d say Tina Fey or Maisie Williams.
>>2824490
it'll happen ;)
Brisbane seems to be a popular destination
>>2824490
hey anon,
I hope this is okay,
love from me
>>2826004
You're a scholar and a gentleman, anon <3
Shitty Photoshop 3DPD: The Thread
It's shit like this that makes us look worse than furfags.
>>2827570
t. furfag sympathiser
Jessica Alba request!
bump
>>2830433
Know what this thread needs more of?
>W O N D E R S L U G
>>2831841
2/3
>>2831841
3/3
Wish I had this fetish, so much good content for it.
>>2831841
ty ty mr anon e moose ;;;))
need giant gf, send help
Unaware fetish content creation is best fetish vontent creation.
>>2834257
>>2834258
>>2835397
THIS IS REALLY WELL DONE
page 10... not this thread
I'm not as good with shadowing as I'd like to be yet, so in the meantime I'm concealing where shadows should be while I get good.
>>2811269
>I point out the lack of money-making sites
There is so much paid giantess content out there. There are self-made millionaires, like Gary Pranzo, who makes his living off size fetish videos.
Countless comic storefronts like botcomics & zzzcomics & giantessfan that specialize in it.
Loads of independent artists making thousands off Patreon & clips4sale. They also sell artwork and paid commissions.
Not to mention all the Japanese artists selling physical comics and developing giantess themed games.
Honestly if you weren't being so articulate in your posts I'd assume you were trolling by failing to do a quick google search.
There's even some mini documentaries out there that explore the size fetish industry, even Playboy did a bit on it not too long ago.
>>2839068
what the heck is that?
>>2839304
Pranzo makes more money of his digital delivery site at this point. His content has been getting progressively lazier over the last couple years and he pretty much only makes videos people pay him to make through custom requests.
>>2839304
>"self-made millionaires"
>Gary Pranzo
that's hyperbole, mate.
>>2780955
god i wish that were me
>>2842318
Why is Alternate such a wizard bros?
>>2828042
I am okay with this but use a different picture. You know the one.
>>2779134
Who dis?
>>2839873
>"I don't know about things I have no interest in and that doesn't bother me"
>>2843030
Very clever!
>>2843030
Who is this model
>>2843220
Alice.
Really hoping there's a giantess scene in Anne Hathaway's new movie
>>2845488
There is not. It's been out at film festivals for a while.
>>2845498
Well that's a let down (Also didn't realize it's been out that long)
>>2845356
Add Godzilla please
>>2845504
C'est la vie mon Anon.
Getting a real macro scene in a movie is like waiting for the monkeys to type out Shakespeare.
/r/ing Victoria Justice since it's been a minute.
>>2845934
Don't do it.
>>2845857
While that was more or less the inspiration behind that, I dick around with these things for the sole purpose of giving myself visual stimuli to jerk my gerk to. I've always thought it was weird when dudes over at the City take a perfectly good collage and start throwing shit all over it for the sake of some kind of entertainment. I don't get that.
Instead have another Ai.
>>2848777
well done
>>2779135
who is this? looks very familiar.
>>2849463
It's MEW
>>2849463
Should be obvious.
>>2849891
That'd be me.
>>2849928
Keep practicing. Don't listen to the haters.
>>2850500
Fine then quit completely.
>>2850700
Nah.
>>2850723
I owe you a debt of gratitude for keeping my favourite thread alive.
Are the three photomanips you posted here all that exist from you works?
>>2850723
please?
>>2851037
They're what exist that I would be willing to post here. I suppose I could go post more on the City since their standards are lower than mine and they think just about anything looks good. But I am for real intentionally bumping this thread with content so that it doesn't die.
Also >>2839287 was me as well.
>>2851292
>their standards are lower than mine and they think just about anything looks good
Truest statement in this entire thread.
>"[One of your favorite giant women] in the city!"
>get excited
>it's 800x600 with severely jagged edges and horrible lighting
>>2851306
Totally agree. I'm posting my first ever collage here instead in the hopes i can actually get some solid critique and improve.
Till then here's two of my favorites from GiantessIsCool over on DA.
1/2
>>2851381
2/2
Speaking of GiantessCity, did they switch to a new forum type? It looks a little different but the bad thing is that none of the image links are working
>>2851381
Can't hardly wait!
Giantessiscool does really detailled work these days
>>2851736
I love that there seems to be a cycle of people making their own content because there's a lack of it. Keep it up!
New thread
>>>2851767