Matrix Movies

Spoiler: they never left the Matrix

Spoiler: Will Smith in it

>>2587225

lol here we fucking go again...

File: moviestills-the-matrix_0oGSdW.jpg-1431060058400.jpg (3MB, 5100x3343px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5100x3343px

>>2583385
>pls no 1920x1080
I'm rather amused as to where you think ppl are going to source film images from that are higher than blu-ray
The only way is interpolation, and that just means complete shit
point in case >>2583389

I guess if someone owns a 70mm print they could do scans, but, who owns that shit? Distributors typically track those like they're gold and then burn them with fire like they're a rebel wilson nude pic

That said, I have a couple o' filmscans

>>2588230
>>2587225
>Spoiler: they never left the Matrix
This is pretty-much accepted canon, now, innit? I mean, the tranny and his brother obviously don't know shit about their own stories

>>2587638
>Spoiler: Will Smith in it
pics or he didn't happen...

File: moviestills-the-matrix_10fc66cb.jpg-1431060091921.jpg (425KB, 2964x2048px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 2964x2048px

>>2588964

File: moviestills-the-matrix_614t7I.jpg-1431060218885.jpg (4MB, 5100x3342px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5100x3342px

>>2588965
Oh,. and if anyone wants to hurr-durr their way into "no one can tell", firstly, bullshit, secondly, the scratches on film are the dead giveaway. Digital artifacts are also pretty easy to see, though they CAN be because of the shitty scan processing

File: moviestills-the-matrix_052ce8af.jpg-1431060134010.jpg (409KB, 2048x3072px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 2048x3072px

>>2588968
>shitty scan processing
point in case...

File: moviestills-the-matrix_Rm2zvX.jpg-1431060275838.jpg (4MB, 3300x5125px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3300x5125px

>>2588969
I'm no film expert, desu, but these could be poster scans, of course, but I'd expect to see different kinds of scratches then

>>2588964
>1920x1080
Lets talk about this resolution. First of all I find it completly unacceptable to post images with that resolution on a board called /hr/. The fact that I need to point out that I want to have higher resolutions is a shame in itself.
Second: I can take good 1080p screenshots myself.

>where you think ppl are going to source film images from that are higher than blu-ray
Well maybe I was a little naive there. I thought there would maybe exist some high res behind-the-scenes material. I was very surprised by the good x-Files thread a few month ago, which had alot of good images clearly not taken from the DVD quality.

>I have a couple o' filmscans
See, you are one of the gods of /hr/ I prayed upon with this thread. Thank you alot for posting! :)

File: 55026311.jpg (556KB, 2498x1739px) Image search: [Google]

556KB, 2498x1739px

>>2588964