Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 10
Thread images: 10
Anonymous
Stephanie Corneliussen 2015-11-25 02:35:57 Post No. 2526694
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Stephanie Corneliussen 2015-11-25 02:35:57 Post No. 2526694
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 1118full-stephanie-corneliussen.jpg (844KB, 1118x1677px) Image search:
[Google]
844KB, 1118x1677px
Stephanie Corneliussen thread :D
>>
File: 1155643.jpg (995KB, 1118x1674px) Image search:
[Google]
995KB, 1118x1674px
>>
File: 000000091.jpg (415KB, 1242x1654px) Image search:
[Google]
415KB, 1242x1654px
>>
File: 000000091611-stephanie_corneliussen-fullsize.jpg (204KB, 1242x1654px) Image search:
[Google]
204KB, 1242x1654px
>>
File: 34244444.jpg (135KB, 1242x1654px) Image search:
[Google]
135KB, 1242x1654px
>>
File: 47457222.jpg (136KB, 1242x1654px) Image search:
[Google]
136KB, 1242x1654px
>>
File: Peru Military Service.jpg (1MB, 5424x3049px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 5424x3049px
Op failing megabytes not Kilobytes
>>
File: Apollo 16.png (5MB, 2700x1520px) Image search:
[Google]
5MB, 2700x1520px
>>2527279
> This Guy
Filesize does correlate with quality/resolution, but you forget format.
A High quality JPEG might be 1MB, but the equivalent lossless PNG would probably be ~4MB.
Observe. Here's the original PNG
>>
File: Apollo 16.jpg (1MB, 2700x1520px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 2700x1520px
>>2527899 (You)
Now try and spot any difference (there is almost none, I needed program to detect any), and notice the filesize difference.
Your argument is invalid. And in addition, You're barely over 1MB, by the same amount OP's barely under. There's another 1023MB to go if you're going to boast about megabytes.
>>
File: Villa_romana_bikini_girls.jpg (4MB, 4227x2747px) Image search:
[Google]
4MB, 4227x2747px
so it's png or pong (jpg) image size against resolution and not the celebrity thread
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 10
Thread images: 10