Uncut dicks

Holy shit so hot

I'd love to suck until you cum

File: tumblr_obi89zo75G1v63hobo1_1280.jpg (359KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 1000x1000px

>>1417513
>brainwashed cutfag detected

File: 20160820_045133.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

2/2

File: received_10210528306068583.jpg (195KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 2048x1152px

>>1417758

File: IMG_0054.jpg (447KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

447KB, 1200x1600px

Soft

File: IMG_0014.jpg (666KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

666KB, 1600x1200px

less soft

File: IMG_0003.jpg (320KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 1600x1200px

harder

oh boy. here i go reporting again

itt: idiots who dont bother to read board rules. idiots who think theyre above board rules. idiots whove never heard of soc and their billions of ignored self dicks threads. idiots who will be reported. dont bother replying to this comment. thread's already hidden for me. enjoy your ban you stupid fags

Hey r u into bdsm

So hot

How big?

>>1418156
Just 7 inches

I'd love that up my ass

File: Fremdschämen-300x217.jpg (19KB, 300x217px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 300x217px

>>1418878

this thread is full of the saddest tiny little ugly bent dicks i have ever seen... :(

>>1417513
fuck off chaim

>>1418861
hot. any more pics?

File: image.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>1419218

File: 8k1l8.jpg (76KB, 688x929px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 688x929px

Just got sent this. My heart skipped a beat.

>>1419324
Holy shit those veins!

>>1419324
yum. not sure id bottom for it though...

>>1419316
nice fat cock, anymore pics??

>>1419324
damn beautifl

File: image.jpg (451KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

451KB, 1200x1600px

>>1419639

File: image.jpg (28KB, 337x450px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 337x450px

>>1419639

File: image.jpg (670KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

670KB, 1536x2048px

>>1419639

File: image.jpg (743KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

743KB, 1536x2048px

>>1419639

>>1419673
loving your dick i would love to see more

File: image.jpg (58KB, 573x573px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 573x573px

>>1419912

>>1419983
such a cutie with a fat dick ;)

>>1419969
Nice! Snapchat or anyone else wanna show off their uncut cocks on so?

File: image.jpg (53KB, 457x457px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 457x457px

>>1420017
Thank you :)

Curious about something. I'm circumsized but for some reason my skin completely covers my dick when I'm flaccid. I find it sort of a hassle to piss because I have to pull the skin back. For some of you guys who have very long, hanging foreskins, do you pull it back when you want to piss or do you just go?

>>1420405
I personally pull my foreskin back when I go for a piss.

Would be interested to see a pic of you if you were willing to post :)

>>1420497
this is as close to perfection as I'll ever see. why do I never meet cocks like this in real life?

File: tmp_6222-IMG01381016953028.jpg (2MB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x1944px

Anyone likes it?

File: 1.jpg (269KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 720x1280px

Swedish cock for you guys! OC

File: 20160730_222038.jpg (221KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 720x1280px

>>1420923

>>1419969
More pls

File: IMG_20120428_094953.jpg (1MB, 2560x1920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1920px

x-post from BWC bread

File: tumblr_nvj0c5L7X71tvjh4xo1_500.jpg (79KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 500x667px

>>1420405
Some guys pull it back all the way every single time. Some guys pull it back just enough not to obstruct the flow. And some guys just pee through the skin if miraculously it doesn't happen to spray everywhere in their case.

File: foto_no_exif.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

Grindr slut

>>1417513
>can't be fun for a mutilated one
>uncut dicks get more pleasure from sex than mutilated dicks

File: image.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

just got sent this

File: image.jpg (44KB, 640x347px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 640x347px

Best one I've ever seen

>>1423882
Not bad

Uncut dicks always smell so glorious whenever I go down on them

Any videos on how to clean them or teaching how to pull back foreskin?

>>1417513
((()))

>>1417513
Lmao same.

>>1419333
>>1420497
Anteater lmao

>>1424683
Has never been proven and it's not like that matters so long as you're getting pleasure.

>>1424993
Who the fuck needs to learn how to pull back their foreskin and clean their dick?

You just pull it and clean it like any other part of your body, jesus christ how complicated do you imagine having a foreskin is

File: IMG_3207.jpg (114KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 600x800px

Saw this in another thread.

>>1425398
What if you've got phimosis though?

>>1425814
Then that's a special case and you should go to the doctor and he'll tell you everything you need to know, which shouldn't be much: either keep slowly pulling on it to make it loose up a bit or cut some of it off. As for cleaning just shove water up there or something.

>>1425393
It doesn't need to be proven...there are literally more nerve cells, more nerve cells=more feeling.

>>1425945
There are millions of nerve endings in a dick, a small amount on a little flap of skin is barely gonna make much difference. Its just easier to jerk without lube

>>1425958
Roughly 30-50% of the nerve endings of the penis are in the foreskin. You're losing about 1/3 to 1/2 of the sensation being cut, plus the glans dries out and gets desensitized. Good chance you lose about 2/3 of your sexual pleasure being cut, depending on how tight the cut is.

>>1425969
>Roughly 30-50% of the nerve endings of the penis are in the foreskin.
>these stats brought to you by autism
Any proof for any of this? Sounds quite a bit like you're talking out of your ass.

>>1425969
The World Health Organization (2007) states that "Although it has been argued that sexual function may diminish following circumcision due to the removal of the nerve endings in the foreskin and subsequent thickening of the epithelia of the glans, there is little evidence for this and studies are inconsistent."[32] Fink et al. (2002) reported "although many have speculated about the effect of a foreskin on sexual function, the current state of knowledge is based on anecdote rather than scientific evidence."[33] Masood et al. (2005) state that "currently no consensus exists about the role of the foreskin."[34] Schoen (2007) states that "anecdotally, some have claimed that the foreskin is important for normal sexual activity and improves sexual sensitivity.

File: sorrells-chart.jpg (152KB, 1000x517px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1000x517px

>>1425971
LOL did you honestly just copy and paste the first thing you found on Wiki? Did you even try to read it?

Try getting some studies from countries that are not desperate to defend the fact they have been crippling the sexuality of the boys for decades:

BJU Int. 2007 Apr;99(4):864-9.
CONCLUSIONS:
The glans of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis. The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis.

Image of the study's findings has been added. This is an actually study that tested areas of the penis for sensitivity. Unsurprisingly, the most sensitive parts are removed during circumcision.

>>1425974
It literally says World Health Organization right at the beginning, stop blaming the US for your idiocy and conspiratorial theories, I'm not even from there anyways. And those are independent studies from unbiased sources in different countries, unlike yours, which is why they're on the wiki.

>>1425976
The statement from the WHO (which is unimaginably poorly managed) is simply "We have a handful of studies and none of them point to a definite correlation". Nothing more. When you have half baked studies streaming in from the states to defend circumcision and they conflict with the studies coming from practically every other modern country, yeah, the WHO states "yeah we dunno".

>>1425979
>When you have half baked studies streaming in from the states to defend circumcision
Hahahah it seems that there is a different issue really going on here. So you hate the US and you manifest that hatred into anti-circumcision rants on 4chan. I feel like I might get mental illness talking to you.

Oh and idk how many times I have to say it but those are independent, unbiased sources from places outside the evil US, they're not defending circumcision any more than they're condemning it, hence the unbiased part. The data is simply inconclusive, which isn't surprising considering how many other health issues share the same status.

File: erssf.jpg (16KB, 287x399px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 287x399px

>>1425980
I frankly don't give much of a shit about the states, but its the source of 80% of the sources that pretend circumcision is somehow a beneficial. Not all, just most.

A big part of this is that sexual medical science, particularly for men, is ages behind everything thanks to "sex for pleasure is evil" cucks of past and present getting in the way. Of all human achievements, our current best birth control for men is "put your penis in a bag". Little surprise they've surmised that "maybe if you cut parts of their penis off it won't have to be cleaned?" with the game plan "Probably do it as a baby so they have no choice in the matter, Stockholm will take effect at that point and it'll perpetuate itself. "

To be fair, its been a rock solid plan so far.

>>1425986
At the end of the day you're mutilating a child, somebody incapacitous to make a decision about whether they want that or not. For the sake of, what did you say, cleaning? I think that's a pretty fucking useless argument. I went to medical school and have seen the evidence. In developing countries, in the context of STDs, it does limit HIV spread because inflamed infected foreskin favours viral transmission. However, I don't know about you, but I wash my dick, and get sexual health check ups. Frankly in the West it should be decided at maturity, the time when you can make your own decisions. Stop chopping body parts off babies it's barbaric.

File: c68dd082-9127-438b-822b-18548d9e736d.png (308KB, 600x440px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 600x440px

>>1417510
>>1417510

>>1426597
perfect tbqh

Fuck my parents. Dumb cunts.

>>1417513
Found the dirty American.

>>1419201
Hot af. Got more? Is this you?

File: 51531426.jpg (80KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 400x400px

>>1427531

>>1419319
??????????????

>>1427545
It's so smooth, I want it in my mouth.

>>1425976

The World Health Organization can be wrong. They're a man-made authority--their word does not create reality. And their "Chief Expert on Circumcision" is David Tomlinson-an inventor and patent holder of circumcision devices.

>Dr. David Tomlinson...serves as the World Health Organization's chief expert on circumcision."

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/sep/26/health/la-he-circumcision-20110926

Here are the patents for the circumcision machines he patented.

http://patents.justia.com/inventor/david-r-tomlinson

The foreskin has been dissected and analyzed histologically. There is empirical, objective evidence that demonstrates that it is loaded with highly specialized nerve endings--more than you find in the glans. Many of the nerve endings in it are tactile corpuscles, whose function is to detect gentle touch; they are the nerve endings for fine touch sensitivity, and circumcision irreversibly destroys many of them. The tactile corpuscles are principally located in the ridged band, a specialized region of the foreskin that is always removed during circumcision. Remove the nerve endings, & you can't feel the sensation in them anymore.

>The glans..is primarily innervated by free nerve endings and has primarily protopathic sensitivity [43]. Protopathic sensitivity refers to cruder, poorly localized feelings (including pain, some temperature sensations and certain perceptions of mechanical contact) [44]. In the glans penis, encapsulated end-organs are sparse, and found mainly along the glans corona and the frenulum [43]...In contrast, the male prepuce ridged band (Fig. 7) at the mucocutaneous junction has a high concentration of encapsulated receptors [46]. The innervation difference between the protopathic sensitivity of the glans penis and the corpuscular receptor-rich ridged band of the prepuce is part of the normal complement of penile erogenous tissue.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1034.x/abstract

>>1425980

It is conclusive that circumcision removes all sensation in the parts of the penis it removes.

The foreskin is a densely-innervated, muscular, heavily vascularized, living part of the penis, not some extra "flap of skin". Remove it, and you remove all the sensation that would come from stimulating its nerve endings.

Snapchat xsteelx123 to show off

File: latest[1].jpg (31KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x500px

>>1427791
>>1427792

>>1429224
Excellent. And nice balls maybe

>>1429194
Sure! Cute dick

File: 1363317969006.jpg (112KB, 415x351px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 415x351px

>>1417513

>>1429321

No offensive, but I really hate "pointed" dicks. I want to suck it, not open a can with it.

File: 1471550479479.jpg (102KB, 500x628px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 500x628px

>>1429330

>Do not post any 'rate me' or any other self shots here. If you want to post pictures of yourself, please use /soc/ - Cams & Meetups.

In case no one got the memo.

Remember to report selfies, guys.

File: 1344057517915.jpg (90KB, 482x640px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 482x640px

>>1429934

File: 1406839126096.jpg (73KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 500x667px

>>1429936

File: -40953807_306054508.jpg (194KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1280x960px

>>1417510

File: david4.jpg (22KB, 816x459px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 816x459px

>>1427396
no its not me. its my ex

>>1431145dont post self pics here and admit its yours chii

>>1424774
is that precum just inside the skin?

>>1426597
Love.

File: Pedro Andreas, Rafael Lords.webm (3MB, 852x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 852x480px

>>1429939

>>1431528
>>1431529
>>1431530

Do you have any reading comprehension?
>Do not post any 'rate me' or any other self shots here. If you want to post pictures of yourself, please use /soc/ - Cams & Meetups.

Enjoy your ban

File: 36656524.jpg (476KB, 2690x1087px) Image search: [Google]

476KB, 2690x1087px

uncut- you should see it when its hard

>>1431842
Go on then.

>>1432269
No.

>>1432326
lol its so dark the thumbnail is black

File: 20151220200934.jpg (386KB, 1308x918px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 1308x918px

>>1417510

>>1426034
This. Also, even in areas where it's considered a public health tool, it's done on consenting adults only. Think about that. The practice extolled without good need to be practiced on infants isn't even done on infants when there is a possible gain.

>>1432991
Either thats a strange glisten or you need to wash your dick

>>1425814
Get a preputioplasty where they loosen the ring and it's fine.

This whole fucking thread is filled with people posting their small filthy dicks and my only post which wasn't even a selfie but a really hot vid of a guy who sent it to me on kik, gets removed? Great job moderating this board.

>>1420924
Oh pretty, I want to have it!!! Can I keep the Penis?

>>1433415

Numerous anons got banned as a result of posting in this thread. The mods delete selfies sporadically. It depends on which ones actually get reported, and whether or not the mods can even tell the difference. Apparently some of them think /hm/ is just the gay version of /soc/, and overlook instances of camwhoring here.

>>1434820

fucking gross

>>1435032
fucking wonderful, you mean.

>>1435766
Darkkmaine pls

>>1433121
How the hell do you have an uncut dick but have a glans that fucked up? That kind of fucked up look is one of the many reasons cut dicks are so hideous.

Protip: Soap is bad for the glans and inner foreskin, just use water.

>>1435926
>>1435930
>>1435935

Did you happen to notice the sticky on your way to shit up our board with your camwhoring?

>Do not post any 'rate me' or any other self shots here. If you want to post pictures of yourself, please use /soc/ - Cams & Meetups.

Fuck off, special snowflake. No one wants your nasty junk.

>>1420405
My foreskin covers the head even when I'm diamonds. I have to retract it when I pee, otherwise it gets everywhere.

I'm curious about your non-foreskin, did you just get a partial circumcision? I'm curious to see what a not-so-quite cut dick of yours looks like.

>>1421090
Huh. Half cut eh? Mind posting close-ups?

>>1436001
What the hell?

>>1427751

I find the thoroughness of your referencing very attractive

>>1436001
>>1436128

Skin bridges. They're a potential complication of circumcision.

Jason Paige wrote a song about his experience with having one (which he refers to as his "piercing").

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoT0I9nCY1M

>>1435820
Incase you havent noticed but thats a very common form of glands, even among uncuts. It's genetically determined, not environmentally and has nothing to do with circumsion, idiots just think it does.

File: tumblr_mj27pubTbX1rx8yf6o1_1280.jpg (125KB, 993x1399px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 993x1399px

>>1425393
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmToXLVrZ7c

>>1436173
is that guy fucking retarded? What's wrong with him?

>>1436304
where's your dick?

>>1436341

>is that guy fucking retarded? What's wrong with him?

What did you mean by this?

>>1436347

Uh did you watch the video? The guy is fucking weird

>>1436355

He's singing a somewhat funny yet also tragic song about something that touched his life in a negative way. Yeah, it's weird but I wouldn't call it "retarded".

Jason Paige is a pretty well known musician known for his irreverent and quirky songs. It's his thing.

He also is the singer of the American version of the Pokemon anime theme song.

>>1436220
While it can sometimes happen, the large majority of uncut guys of smooth glans, while the majority of cut guys have rough, cracked glans.

>>1417820
Looks like a finger.

>>1436770
Really? I frequent both cut and uncut threads for the love of cock and it seems roughly a 50:50 thing for both cut and uncut.
Besided, a dry looking head isnt even that bad, unless it's absolutly horrendous.
In my opinion we should complain more about things that make dick look truly disgusting. Things like phimosis (so many of the dicks in this thread seem to have it), or when the forskin is too long and makes the whole thing look like a sock or something else fucked up (I'm looking at you and the many like you, freak >>1420497), and perhaps worst of all, when the foreskin is cut too short so it leaves that great stretch of pink scar-like tissue looking ass skin that takes up half the cock (seriously wtf would the doctor be thinking when doing those circumcisions? "I could stop at the foreskin but I think cutting half the skin off this baby's cock sounds even better!")

not to be rude but most of these are gross.

>>1436891
Theres a disgusting jewdick thread here too, you should probably go there

>>1436886
Yeah I dunno where you see that, the ratio is closer to 95:5, both online and from personal experience. The running theory that I've read is that the glans can be damaged if the boy had his foreskin pulled by forcefully when he was still young, damaging the way the glans grows.

While sure, an overly long foreskin is kinda gross, the nastiest thing is just not having a foreskin. The foreskin is one of the nicest parts of the penis, and its honestly the only "working" part of the penis. Without a foreskin, a penis is basically just a space filler, a dowel. The smooth glide of the foreskin is the hottest thing a dick can do. As for appearance, a thick frenar band and frenulum paired with a smooth finish on the glans, fucking amazing.

File: bafg.gif (648KB, 216x288px) Image search: [Google]

648KB, 216x288px

back and forth, back and forth

>>1436907
>>1436886
I like how our differing ideals of what we find attractive is an effective display of how such things are 100% subjective, (therefore what we both have to say is essentially meaningless, but god damn I'll say it anyway). For example I find a thick frenar to look gross as fuck, especially when the foreskin bunches up too much, so no, not fucking amazing matey.

Also:
>its honestly the only "working" part of the penis. Without a foreskin, a penis is basically just a space filler, a dowel.
When you're actually fucking retarded. Sure the foreskin has the function of a natural lube because the excess skin allows the muscle and spongy tissues to slide around within it more easily (like a fat guy who losses a lot of weight, the excess skin slides over the body easily), but by no fucking means do you have the right to claim what you have when literally every part of the dick is a functional 'working' part of it. It makes you come off as a fuckwit 12 year old who's never attended a primary school health class before, who's blindly fighting for his side (although by writting all this I've not proven myself the better man, if anything it makes me worse).
Finally:
>The smooth glide of the foreskin is the hottest thing a dick can do
Nah, you're thinking of a cock cumming, thats literally the hottest thing they can do. (But like I said, subjective)

File: 1471720931509.jpg (97KB, 599x955px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 599x955px

Here's something I'd like further info on if anyone has it.
The foreskin has sensory neurons within it, just as the glands do, thats pretty common knowledge now days (and always has been to anyone with a foreskin). But, the percieved sensitivity of a region within ones body is determined by two factors (very simplified view follows) the number of afferent neurons in a particular spot and the number of cortical neurons in the sensory cortex, devoted to the processing of those neural inputs when said region is stimulated. What is also known is that the brain is very maluable and can easily (especially as an infant or child) be 're-wired' and unused/redundant segments of the brain get devoted to other functions. Lastly multiple studies from WHO (an unbias source unless you're one of those "everythings a consipracy man!" People) claims circumsition doesn't reduce senstivity (to any significant degree).
With all this in mind is it possible that the neurons of the sensory cortex that were once devoted to the foreskin are being re-utilised, thanks to the brains plasticity, as processors for the sensory inputs recived via the glands, leading to an increased sensitivity/lack of loss of sensitivity, as claimed by WHO, counteracting the foreskin's removal? i.e., more of the sensory cortex is devoted to the head of the penis now that what was devoted to the foreskin is no longer required, therefore it gleans approximatly equal pleasure from stimulation as an uncircumcised individual does.
Just spouting pure shit here but it would be interesting to find out more. Or better yet you can come in and mindlessly hate on this post screaming like chimps about how circumsition 100% reduces sensetivity because herp-a-derp-a-diddly-dumb muh opinions ah reckon things and what you say runs contrary to muh beliefs so I must get butthurt (dont be that guy /hm/, dont be tumblr).

File: tumblr_niwhd2mEtx1rbtkqvo1_400.jpg (42KB, 400x470px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 400x470px

>>1437283
>>1437268

tldr;
protip: talking a lot isn't communicating

Big and uncut

>>1437268
>>1437283
Looks like I triggered him, oops.

The best part of what you started raging on about sensitivity (though no on even brought that up), spewing buckets of psuedo-science about shit that is incredibly poorly documented. There hasn't even been a single study that states any correlation of neuroplasticity and it's attempt to adjust for amputated sensory organs. Its mostly just non-sense from circumcised guys trying defend what happened to them.

The WHO is a collection of entities which has conflicting opinions constantly. Their position is based on the fact that there are only a handful of studies on the topic of various locations and methods and none of them agree on anything. Though before you go thinking they don't have bias among their ranks, the head of the circumcision debate in the WHO is a circumcision device patent holder who is a beneficiary of the sales of these devices, so he's got a tangible reason to promote it.

>>1417510
Are autists still arguing about circumcision like anyone cares about their opinion or like anyone actually reads these giant, useless blocks of text besides the poster?

>>1437268
>>1437268
You forgot to actually try to make a point about the foreskin being the only working part, you just threw a tantrum.

Grab an uncut penis, a cut penis and a bowling pin. Other than producing heat and cumming, I don't really see the difference between the bowling pin and the cut dick. The uncut penis actually contributes to a pumping action, makes it easy and effortless. The bowling pin/cut dick just sits there as a space filler, sure you can stick it into something, given you have enough lube, but thats it. Now that I think about it, the bowling pin is actually probably better, since the edge of the corona would scape lubricants out of the body, where the smoother shape of the pin wouldn't. The foreskin bunches up behind the corona, trapping the lubricants from escaping, making it the best of the three.

I hadn't thought about his before, but uncut>bowling pin>cut.

>>1437340
I'm not a part of this but just out of curiosity what happened in your life to make you feel that arguing circumcision on 4chan was something worthwhile?

>>1437343
Was circumcised, not a fan of it, shitty to get opted for the inferior model. Also I'm bored and waiting for my laundry to finish up.

>>1437346
This is like answering the question "Why did you put your dick in the blender" with "I had time before dinner."

>>1437350
I don't come here with the intent of arguing, just to look at nice uncut dicks

I wish i could suck all of you at once :0

>>1437340
this is the most autistic thing I've ever read. Like...are you really that fucked in the head? Jfc arguing against a kids right to whatever is one thing, but do you have to be an actual dumbass too?

>>1437378
Another tantrum?

>>1437328
You're clearly an idiot who can't follow a simple discussion. Sure no one had brought up sensitivity before, but he did because he wanted to know more about the topic, not because it was being hotly debated at any one point. Also what he said isn't psuedo-science, he's taken the information availble to him and constructed an, albeit fucking shit, hypothesis that, guess what, isnt an unfalsifiable claim so it cannot be psuedo-science by the very measure of how scientists decided what is or is not psuedo-science.
Sadly for him, as you've pointed out, we are very lacking in this area of medical expertise for many reasons so tough titties for the cunt. Personally I like to believe one of those reasons is becasue in the real world no one cares that much and its only in the shit pits of the internet that people feel the need scream and throw their opinions around like they're valid in anyway and yes I know I'm doing that right now.
Also can I get a link to your claim of the guy with the circumsion patent, you know unless that was entirly made up just to get people riled up. Can I atleast get the guys name so I can google him myself?

>>1437340
Wow, like actually wow! Are you even human? Have you ever touched or seen a circumcised penis? Or know what a vagina is or how it works? Have you seen any kind of vaginal intercourse before with a cut dick? Because from your autistic posting it is more than obvious you have not.

>>1437328
>>1437399
But hey guys, buddies, pals of mine from what I can see you've got all one brain cell firing so I'll have to invoke that most basic of debate rules "Never argue with an idiot, the idiot always wins."
Nighty night your butthurt fill me with warmth

>>1437366
>>1437340
Why insist upon arguing then?

>>1437346
You just admitted how biased your opinion is. Who taught you how to argue?

>>1437435
All the info you need is already in the thread
>>1427751

>>1437438
Am bi, have a circumcised penis, fucked both men and women. I'm not sure what part of that you missed.

>>1437476
The part where thats not how sex works and your cock doesnt scrape out lubricant, unless the head of your cock is gargantuan and has bristles like a cats dick. Are you sure you've had sex?

File: circumcised_lubrication.png (19KB, 290x166px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 290x166px

>>1437479
Yeah, lots of lube is needed to go for more than 30 minutes. Here like, maybe a picture can help? I'm not sure how to get through to someone so thick...

>>1437481
The only reason you need lube is because who ever you're fucking is no longer aroused enough to produce natural lubrication, particularly if all you're doing is jackhammering in and out for half an hour. I have never, ever need lube to fuck (excluding anal). Maybe I'm the anomily here, maybe you are. Can we get more cutfags in to expland our sample size?
Preferable cutfags who aren't beyond bias (>>1437346)

File: btre.jpg (167KB, 600x983px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 600x983px

>>1437487
Lets not get more cutfags in here, they just spout shit to defend their mangled members and start arguments in here. Lets get back to the point of this thread.

>>1437513
>that dick

>>1437524
Looks nice, doesn't look 8 inches honestly

>>1437283

See >>1427751

>>1437531
http://imgur.com/a/l7Ito

this is 8 inches

>>1437524
>>1437555
Good for you.
>>1299359
>Do not post any 'rate me' or any other self shots here. If you want to post pictures of yourself, please use /soc/ - Cams & Meetups.
Also why the fuck would you go in an "uncut dicks" thread and not show off your foreskin.
Fuck off.

File: IMG_1578.png (58KB, 250x145px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 250x145px

surprised by lack of dirty cock, anyone else like smegma?

Source: http://foreskinsmell.tumblr.com/post/142096101579/more-tasty-pics-from-a-bi-guy-looking-he-is-into

File: IMG_1579.jpg (95KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 500x375px

>>1437684

File: ftyuiu.gif (2MB, 268x318px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 268x318px

>>1437684
>>1437685
>cutfags being this clever

>>1437744
She tried it didn't she

>>1437684
Smegma is disgusting.
Make your own thread please.

>>1437744
MOAR acroposthian sucking!! I love sucking the actual foreskin tip, and seeing it in porn!!! Sauce?

File: rorihots.jpg (139KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 900x1200px

>>1437829
Its not hard to find, but 99% of what you'll find is straight

>>1438139
That is some fucking amazing detail

File: IMG_1589.jpg (201KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 960x1280px

not mine but love it tight

File: 147501834457056271281.jpg (3MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x3120px

Mine

File: 20160926_141416~3.jpg (1MB, 4191x2358px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4191x2358px

Me

>>1438419
do you have a snapchat or kik?

File: DSCN0023 (1).jpg (144KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 640x480px

I may not look it, but I was never circumcized, and never plan to be. Just lucky to have my foreskin stretch out evenly across, when I'm fully erect that is.

File: gay-cum-gifs-Fagsmut-018.gif (1MB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x250px

>>1438639
post flaccid

>>1438636
>>1438637
>>1438638
>>1438639

Did you bother to read the rules, you fucking mongrel?

>Do not post any 'rate me' or any other self shots here. If you want to post pictures of yourself, please use /soc/ - Cams & Meetups.

No one wants to see your edgy goth fingernails or your gross fatty pubic pad. /hm/ isn't for trannies.

>>1437684
My ex, who lived in another city and had a wonderful foreskin, always kept his dick unwashed when he visited. He only had to drop his trousers and I would go all giddy. Ah! Those were the days!

>>1437358
this is my dream: a guy with this much foreskin.

>>1439284
Why is it only here I see peoples that are obsessed with foreskin or not having it? Nobody I know or anybody I had sex with ever cared.

File: IMG_1657.jpg (159KB, 750x937px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 750x937px

>>1439290
I also like this where there's just a tiny bit on the head especially that rim where it probably collects the best. It's probably the amount they collect just from walking around all day, fuckk

>>1439292
Absolutely disgusting.

>>1439296
go take your jewdick to the other threads if you don't like foreskin

File: 33dds.gif (981KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

981KB, 500x275px

>>1439286
Its hard to tell a cut guy your with "man I really wish you had a foreskin", kinda makes em feel like shit
>>1439290
>>1439296
I am slightly impressed how persistent these cutfags are, why does a uncut master race cock thread always make them so insecure? Why do they feel the need to come in here?

>>1439306
He could have been referring to what he said, not the pic.
>>1439292
Obvious cutfag, even if the person had dermatitis in his foreskin (which I don't think can even happen), you couldn't possibly collect that much in a day, that takes weeks or months of not cleaning, and even then, frankly the cock doesn't work that way. The oil and dead skin slowly makes its way out of the foreskin unless intentionally prevented. More than likely that pic is fake or intentionally done.

File: 21-milo-yiannopoulos.w710.h473.2x.jpg (74KB, 1420x946px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1420x946px

M(ilo's)FW he has to suck an uncut dick. Verified.
>Is gay, only sucks cut.

>>1439520
Why would you only suck cut (or uncut for that matter) dicks?

Seems rather silly. Personally I like nibbling on foreskins etc, but I have nothing against cut dicks. I am uncut btw.

>>1439520
I've turned down guys for being cut, he can have a preference if he want, even if its scarred up zombie dicks. Why post that here? Still really butthurt that your penis doesn't work or look normal?

>>1417513
fuck off americunt. i bet you derived pleasure getting your microdick cut off

>>1439638
>getting this triggered

>>1439690
Post more!! ;)

>>1439690

>>>/soc/

faggot

>>1439690
wonderful! I love it when the skin covers the knob even when hard. I want my tongue inside it!

>>1439541
so many beautiful cocks here :)

>>1426618
It's just so sad looking.

>>1442694
this looks like it's about to spit acid or something

>>1442694
monster foreskin on a monster cock!

>>1442718
I don't know why but putting it that way really turns me the fuck on.

It adds to its sexual potency, pointing out how it looks dangerous

I looooooove fully hooded hard cocks.

>>1430894
you're disgusting

>>1417539
>>1424683
>>1427393
>>1439638
Shut up about the cutfags. Im a cutfag and uncut dicks are my fetish.

>>1439534
That venomous language could only spew forth from somebody with their own complex or personality disorder. What's it like being so undesired?

Have you ever noticed that cutfags always get butthurt over uncut threads and shitpost in them, but nobody ever does that to cut threads? Why are cutfags so insecure.

>>1446943
This could not be farther from the truth

>>1446997
What the fuck are you talking about? The vast majority of porn is cut. When the hell do you hear comments saying "wow I wish he had foreskin."

Even mast most disillusioned girls in the US; for some fucking reason, they'res a stigma against having a dick that isn't cut up. You can literally google "uncut guys are gross" threads on Google. You sounds pretty insecure to me.

I'll never get the obsession with cut guys defending their mutilated dicks. It's literally cutting off a functional piece of skin from your penis, and then you have the urge to claim it'a for health/cleanliness/some other bullshit that man has *gasp* lived with for thousands of years without issue. I long for the day when people laugh at the idea of us defending cutting off part of your dick. Just accept that it's an unscientific practice rooted in outdated beliefs and move the fuck on.

Can we just get back to posting pics? I'd post but I can't upload from this phone.

>>1446943
>>1446997
It happens, but not with the universality that it occurs with the uncut threads.

>>1448075
Yes, this. More dicks please.

I'm uncut and I have to admit most of these dicks are ugly as fuck hahaha

>>1418878
Anyone know why bend to the left.

>>1419324
nice veiny uncut dick!!

if america widely practiced FGM you know there would be plenty of people here who say they like how it looks.. I honestly don't understand how someone can find a normal penis disgusting unless they aren't actually gay