Uncut is beautiful. Foreskin fetish here.
>>1368503
Are phimoses or tight foreskin cute or meh?
Only if the man himself is beautiful. I see faces, characters and behaviours not just dicks. It's the last in my mind whenever I'm getting to know someone. With that being said, yes, I too love the look of foreskins.
>>1368517
Depends on the severity. If his foreskin is just tight when he's hard, but can go back a bit? It's cute.
If it won't budge an inch when erect, like super tight, small opening? No.
It's an easy thing to fix too with stretching and creams from a Doctor, so there's no reason to have severe phimosis.
>>1368678
Yeah, but on /hm/, these faggots prefer headless torso and dicks.
Holy shit I'm pretty sure I hooked up with this guy before
>>1368488
I wouldn't consider it a fetish. If anything preferring them cut is a fetish. This is just the natural state.
Picture of a buddy I wife swap with. His unit is pretty so I thought I'd share. It's also the only uncircumcised penis my wife and I have ever seen so it's pretty special to us.
>>1372839
sauce?
>>1372843
>>1371034
Could you share some stories of how she reacted to an uncut one?
My..
>>1368488
It's not uncut, it's intact. This is what dicks are normally until we mutilate them for abrahamic god.
>>1375589
>This is what dicks are normally until we mutilate them for abrahamic god.
Funny people still think this way in 2016. All circumcision is religious and not health-based whatsoever. Even after they've already proven there's no noticeable difference in pleasure between cut and uncut and most porn features cut dicks.
>>1375635
health-based circumcision makes pretty much no sense in america.
while it may make some sense in places like africa, where HIV is more rampant and access to preventative measures is much more difficult (given a study that shows intact penises are more susceptible to getting infected by it while topping, regardless of whether you're topping a man or woman)
america has very different medical circumstances and medicine is often not one-size-fits-all.
>>1375664
I never said everyone should be circumcised but there have been proven benefits as far as avoiding diseases other than HIV to circumcision (penile cancer, UTI's, other STD's etc.) Also I think seeing the head of the dick rather than some inconsistent flap of skin is more attractive, but that's subjective.
Does anyone have the uncut cock webm from tumblr with it bieng huge and and kinda hard in a bathroom?
>>1376216
what tumblr did you get that pic from
>>1374002
Moar
>>1376627
It was leddit.
/r/guysfrombehind
>>1376216
Nevermind I found it in the archives.
>>1376846
classic
shame he disappeared
>>1375574
Loverly.
>>1377140
yeah, i find it inconceivable that a dude with a dick that big could just vanish. not even any videos.
>>1377195
>inconceivable
That some people choose not to become porn stars... ?
Like, I don't want to be rude but it seems like so many posters on this site spend WAY to much time talking about sex with, like, chronic masterbaters and sex addicts (no shame in BEING those things, if course) and forget that /hm/ and other porn communities do not represent the whole of human society.
>>1377225
i meant more in the sense that no thirsty fags have tracked him down since. i mean, dude had a tumblr and an account on some dick worship site, it's not like he was shying away from the attention.
till he disappeared, of course.
So many hot cocks and a few gross phimosis. I'd love to get on my knees and suck 4 or 5 till they came all over my face. Huge uncut dick is probably the sexiest body part.
>>1368488
I completely prefer uncut just because I like knowing I am getting the whole person. I empathize with people and agree cutting should be stopped just as a basic human decency issue. But I like cut ok too. I get the argument against the cutting, but dont understand why it seems to cause hostility between the two groups on this site.
Its not an aesthetic thing for me. Theres a lot of different looking cocks, and many of them are just fine.
>>1377289
People fight about it because most cut guys are insecure about the loss. They hate the idea that their parents removed a sensitive part of their genitals for no reason. So then they assert a bunch of fake benefits by calling uncut dicks hideous, unclean, and a vector of disease. This, in turn, angers the uncut guys who become defensive about their natural cocks, and spurs on comments about mutilation and lack of sensitivity.
Basically, most dudes are totally neurotic about the unchangeable qualities of their dicks, but can you blame them? Society puts undue emphasis on the appearance of genitals.
>>1377289
My preference is for uncut cocks. Whether that's because I'm cut I can't explain, I just know that I prefer uncut. For me, the pleasure in sucking an uncut cock, getting my tongue right inside the foreskin, is incredible. I also enjoy cut cocks and would never turn away someone because they were cut. I also think that an uncut cock looks better so for me it is an aesthetics thing. I don't understand, either, the hostility, not just here, which seems to be from cut to uncut.
>>1375635
Source on the no noticeable difference of pleasures please. I mean come on anon, part of your dick is gone.
>>1379101
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2515674/Its-official-Circumcision-DOESNT-affect-sexual-pleasure-according-biggest-study-issue.html
Yes, the small flap of skin that hangs loosely at the end of your dick. Stop acting like they take off a chunk.
>>1379108
Fair enough, as long as you're backing up your claims it's all good.
>>1377971
>unchangeable
You can actually grow a new foreskin if you're cut, it's called tugging. You can do it by hand or they make these devices. Takes months though, and the foreskin you're born with apparently has nerve endings that a regrown one doesn't, but apparently it still helps regain sensitivity. I've been wanting to try it myself, anyone have any experiences?
>>1379108
>Professor Brian Morris
Nice source.
This guy is a pro-circumcision advocate who is known to be linked with hurtcore-related gay pedophile rings.
Literally he is a shill for circumcision because he is sexually aroused by watching the procedure being done on little boys (and in fact, there are many sick fucks who fetishize this specifically and run circumcision advocacy groups).
Inform yourself.
>>1380769
We've had restoration shills on this board for years, a while back they posted a website on here with links to their forum and site where you could buy skin tuggers, funnily enough like the one that was just asked about above. Odd that you would be calling out a shill on this website considering the above. Also he ran one of the biggest studies ever recorded, regardless of what you may think of him to try and discredit he (and other scientists) supposed biased findings. Where's your proof? Why should we buy tuggers?
>>1380773
Come to think of it, this corner of the internet is FAR more opposed to circumcision than just about any other sex related website I've ever been to. I wonder why that is...
>>1380776
Probably because it should be a person's own choice.
>>1380777
When did I ever say it shouldn't be? There are health and hygienic benefits to circumcision that may outweigh whatever unnoticeable sensitivity you may lose that would cause an adult to want to have it done, I've never advocated doing a lifelong medical procedure on a child. However to say that "natural is always better" and circumcision is worthless is totally ludicrous, if we're putting words in each other's mouths now. Especially considering other "natural" things like the appendix and the adenoids.
>>1380779
But the appendix and tonsils aren't fun to play with.
>>1380782
Neither are STD's and penile cancer but hey, flaps of skin are fun too.
>>1380783
Wash yo dick, this ain't no Chinese sex comic.
>>1380779
>triggered cutfag identified
>no bias
>much science
>>1379108
>Yes, the small flap
The foreskin is not a flap.
flap (n)
>something flat and broad that is attached at one side only and hangs loosely or covers an opening:
the flap of an envelope; the flap of a pocket.
That does not describe the foreskin.
>of skin
It's not just skin.
>The prepuce is an integral, normal part of the external genitalia that forms the anatomical covering of the glans penis and clitoris. The outer epithelium has the protective function of internalising the glans (clitoris and penis), urethral meatus (in the male) and the inner preputial epithelium, thus decreasing external irritation or contamination. The prepuce is a specialized, junctional mucocutaneous tissue which marks the boundary between mucosa and skin; it is similar to the eyelids, labia minora, anus and lips. The male prepuce also provides adequate mucosa and skin to cover the entire penis during erection. The unique innervation of the prepuce establishes its function as an erogenous tissue [8].
...
>The dartos smooth muscle is specific to the male external genitalia and the vast majority of the penile dartos muscle is contained within the prepuce. The dartos muscle consists of smooth muscle cells invested with elastic fibres (Fig. 8).
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1034.x/pdf
>that hangs loosely at the end of your dick.
No, it's an integral part of the penis attached to the rest of the penis skin, and removing it fundamentally alters the way the penis behaves. The foreskin is a mobile, densely innervated structure, and it is capable in many men of drawing back to cover the whole shaft. It does not "hang loosely at the end of your dick".
>Stop acting like they take off a chunk.
They do. See pic related.
The foreskin is 12 to 15 square inches of densely innervated erogenous tissue. It's not a flap, it's not just "skin", it is not so small, and it does not "hang loosely at the end of your dick". These are all myths.
>>1380773
>Morris and Krieger’s recent claim [1]that male circumcision has no adverse sexual effects misleads the reader. By downplaying empirical studies that have reported adverse sexual effects (often by selectively citing Morris' own non-peer-reviewed e-letters, and failing to mention or take into account others' critiques of those pieces), Morris and Krieger reach a conclusion that defies common sense.
>The foreskin itself is highly innervated erogenous tissue, which following amputation can no longer provide any sensory input to the brain. [2]-[5] During ntercourse, for example, the foreskin not only minimises chafing (common in circumcised men [6] [7], but also provides erotogenic sensations as it glides back and forth over the glans, stimulating the latter structure and vice versa [8].
>Clearly, any sexual activity involving the physical manipulation of the foreskin is necessarily lost to circumcision [9]. To claim then, as Morris and Krieger have, that "male circumcision has no adverse effect on sexual function, sensitivity, sexual sensation, or satisfaction" is to adopt rather limited definitions of those terms[9].
>As Bossio et al.(2014) have recently stated, the paper by Morris and Krieger is "not a meta-analysis, thus, no statistical analyses of the data have been performed, instead, the article presents the authors, interpretation of trends" (p. 2854) [10] In giving such a subjective interpretation, however, Morris and Krieger misrepresent the information that is included in their own review.
http://file.scirp.org/pdf/ASM_2015033116102429.pdf
>Be me
>Be cut
>Bjs do nothing
>Actual sex feels like nothing
>Literally begin to hate most things sexual because I can never get satisfied
>Tfw your sex life has been ruined because my parents wanted my dick to look "normal"
>>1381018
Hahahah lies, you're clearly uncut. I've been cut since I was a teen and I can't make it more than 5 mins into a blowjob before letting lose, but keep spreading this rumor if you like. Uncuts still look primitive and gross and dick-cheesy which is why they aren't in porn.
>>1381025
just cut off your eyelids.
they're just flaps.
>>1381025
>>1380832
Nobody wants to buy your tuggers or visit your strange pro foreskin tumblrs. It's a flap of skin with nerves in it, and backwoods African circumcisions aren't the same as professionally medically done ones. Also LMAO >something flat and broad that is attached at one side only and hangs loosely or covers an opening that exactly describes a foreskin, your grammar is further off than your weird views.
Inb4 tired old triggered cut-fag response. I just happen to be connected to reality and get laid and know what people like. This is in the UK that is, maybe you're in a weird ass Saudi country where everythings backwards and women can't drive, in which case there's nothing I can say to help you.
>>1381027
Eyelids actually serve a purpose and don't look gross and primitive.
>>1381031
>Nobody wants to buy your tuggers
I don't sell tuggers. Foreskin "restoration" is a misnomer. Once the foreskin is gone, you can't get it back. At best "restoration" will give you an imitation, but it won't be the same.
>It's a flap of skin with nerves in it
It's not a flap, and it's not just skin. It's a combination of muscle tissue, skin, and mucocutaneous tissue. It's no more "just skin" than your glans or your tongue is.
>something flat and broad that is attached at one side only and hangs loosely or covers an opening that exactly describes a foreskin, your grammar is further off than your weird views.
The foreskin isn't flat, it's not broad, and it's attached to the rest of the penis 360 degrees. If anything it's more of a toroid.
>>1381033
The foreskin serves a purpose. It's the primary sensory structure of the human penis, with more specialized sensory end organs than any other part of the penis, including the glans. lrn2histology
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DD2yW7AaZFw [Embed]
>>1381033
The eyelid analogy works very well. Your eyelid protects your eye from drying out and from abrasion by the environment. Without it, the surface of the eye keratinizes and becomes opaque, which hurts and can destroy the ability for the eye to be used as a sensory organ.
But hey. You won't have to worry so much about pink eye or eye bugers right?
>>1382332
You don't quite have to see through your cock, do you?
Also, comparing something as complex as an eye with something as simple as a dick. Sure, go on.
>>1382347
>something as simple as a dick
if your dick is simple then it is because your parents cut all the complexity off
>>1382347
Of course you don't see with your cock! You feel with it dummy! All that keratin might make it pretty hard to do that though.
Also, as others have said, foreskin isn't just for protection. It contains fine touch neurons.
Even as an intact man, I can tell that I don't have fine touch neurons on the glans. Sure, it's sensitive to friction, but it can't feel the detail of the textures that the foreskin can. I'd compare the sensation to that of my lips. The rest of my dick in comparison is about as sensitive as the skin on my arms.
>>1375664
Even the WHO study about circumcision and HIV is taken out of context when people claim cutting it prevents the disease. The study included the sex-free healing time in the trial period, involved voluntary circumcision of adult males, studied only female-male transmission (which is less common in the first place), and took place in places like Uganda, worlds away from countries like the USA. Those are only some of the flaws I can name. Anyone who cites that study and claims that neonatal circumcision reduces HIV transmission in the West is probably either misinformed or has an agenda.
>>1375670
UTIs are noticeably less common in males than in females and are very easily prevented and treated. Many STIs other than HIV, like syphilis and yeast infections, are often transmitted through means completely irrelevant to sex. Even in cases of sexual contact, circumcision is no substitute for more solid methods of protection, and the risk difference between a circumcised man with a condom and an intact man with a condom is so small as to discredit advocacy of circumcision as effective disease control.
Penile cancer is usually preceded or tied to infection with HPV, which is preventable by safe sex and vaccination. Even without taking this into account, penile cancer is extremely rare in the developed world; you'd have a better statistical argument for excising male breast tissue to prevent male breast cancer.
>>1379108
>Daily Fail
>Brian "Lyin'" Morris
ebin
>>1381031
Who mentioned tuggers or tumblr? You're the only one that brought it up.
me. rate?
>>1382557
>>1382557
I wanna lick it and stick my tongue underneath the foreskin.
You can bitch and moan and strawman all you want, the facts are that your penis has been mutilated against your will, and you're bitter now.
Just post dicks and shut the fuck up.
>>1382557
great cock
foul wretched camera
Uncut baby
>>1383347
fapping must be so easy if you have a foreskin, especially one like that
>>1383347
no, please put it back
>this thread
>>1384346
Wooops fail
>>1384346
>>1384348
>>1384353
>>1384392
>>1299359
> Do not post any 'rate me' or any other self shots here. If you want to post pictures of yourself, please use /soc/ - Cams & Meetups.
>>1385506
Looks a bit tight. I wonder if he can retract. Or whether he even cares if he can or can't.
I have a hypothesis that men who have long but tight foreskins that completely cover the glans even when they're erect have particularly sensitive acroposthions.
I've seen videos of them pulling it and some of them cum just from playing with that piece of the foreskin.
>>1384396
I just dont understand why this board rejects amatuer porn and the traffic and community we could have.
I understand plain porn not allowed on soc. I dont understand why am porn is so reviled here, at least by a very vocal few. Who cares if it stokes someones ego. At least there is discussion and pics.
>>1386927
>I dont understand
if you had been here when every thread was ugly overweight children begging for acceptance with grainy dark photos of what was either a penis or a plucked turkey neck you would understand.
just go to >>>/soc/ if that's what you are looking for.
this board is about images that are produced with the intent to be attractive, not images that are (poorly) produced with the intent to beg for attention.
>>1387050
>>1387053
>>1387050
cool, reported
>>1368488
http://bit.
ly/25xOEE4
>>1387156
>>1387158
>>1387161
>>1387571
Sauce? Or any more of this, possibly at full mast?
>>1387574
i got this one i take it yesterday its a different one look at the head
my cock
>>1376853
>mfw I see this
God damnit that could be me.
Heya 1
2
3
add me on snapchat, horny3764
>>1387613
Prove it
Tell me you want it
>>1389597
I want it...
...to be posted on /soc/.
Fuck off.
Pre wank
>>1386868
uhh
link to those videos?
>>1392103
what the fuck it looks like a dead snake that has been rotting in water for weeks
>>1392213
this looks like a rotting snake? Have you ever seen a dead snake? Have you ever seen a live snake?
>>1369745
an average 4chan user
>>1375670
a reasonable person on 4chan. My god.
rate me
>>1393973
moar!
>>1369935
oh god
>>1369936
I want this shoved in my mouth
>>1386868
I don't have a really tight foreskin, but I can make it cover the head when I jerk off.
If I'm really horny, pulling it back hard can shoot me over the edge really fast.
Me
??
>>1395040
>still thinks Europe is relevant
>still thinks we think about much less care about Europe
Top kek.
>>1395121
Well, really almost the rest of the world. The only ones who mutilate dicks are Americans, Muslims and Jews (with a few fringe cultures). 75% of men in the world aren't cut.
>>1393442
That's just someone trying to defend the fact mommy and daddy removed functional parts of his penis.
Frenulums are by far the hottest part of the dick
>>1396576
prominent frenulums are my least favourite part of uncut dicks. I don't like the look of them, and I don't like to run my tongue over them.
I prefer a subtle one, like pic related or less.
>>1396578
Whaaaaat!? Its like the pull string of the penis crossbow, ready to fire off. Its also literally the most sensitive part of the penis, so strumming it with your tongue makes em twitch and squirm!
>>1396582
why do you type like a furry
>27 and still only pulled foreskin back once and flaccid and was so scared I never did it again, only went back after I threw a bucket of cold water on it
It hurts too much when erect. I just never let others touch my dick now.
>>1396811
Before you waste any more of your life, quit being a pussy and go see a doctor. Either get circumcised and have a functional dick in 6 weeks, or get a steroid cream prescribed and work on a daily stretching routine for several months until you can finally pull it back comfortably. Plenty of people have phimosis, it's easily treatable and not a big deal.
>>1386927
Cause it ruins the fucking thread. Apparently most people are typically unattractive, with gross bodies and think that a photo of their cock will make all the faggots salivate. No. It's gross and is unappealing. Look at this fucking thread now. All the latest post are stupid attention whoring men who are oblivious to the fact that, no, dick pics never look good if done by an amateur. Porn tries to make dicks look attractive and highlight what we love about them, amateur dick pics are poorly lit, unrepresentative, and just a gross look at the human penis. It's like an average looking women with makeup off.
>>1386960
Someone with common sense.
What do you think?
>>1396815
>Either get circumcised and have a partially functional dick in 6 weeks
ftfy
>>1396768
why do you type like a faggot?
> /hm/
Right never mind
>>1397420
You don't have to be a faggot if you're gay. I fucking hate faggots and I'm gay.