Why aren't you a member of the Richard III Society, /his/?

They still trying to deny he had a crook back?

All hail the true king Richard!

>>967339
He had scoliosis, but he wasn't a hideously ugly clubfooted hunchback with a withered arm.

>>967327

Because I can access most of the material they publish already, without having to directly associate with the more... interesting members.

>>967339

He wasn't. They go to great lengths to explain this in the news conference and following documentaries.

>>967327
because nobody cares about him outside of Bongistan

>>969272

>implying some of their most frothingly fanatic members aren't clapistanis.

>>967327
His story always makes me sad. Most tragic king of england. The last true king of england, last of the best royal dynasty in european history

>>967327
that's clearly henry v, not richard iii

>>971186
It's obviously based on the flattering facial reconstruction of Richard III. I wouldn't be surprised if it had been commissioned by the Plantagenet Alliance or some similar organization.

>972213

The artist has a description of what went into it on his website.

http://www.studio88.co.uk/acatalog/New_Richard_III_at_Bosworth_painting.html

File: large_henry_tudor_print.jpg (104KB, 573x800px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 573x800px

>>973830

This triggers Yorkists.

>>970537
>the best royal dynasty in european history
Macedonian dynasty wants a word m80

File: ian the man.png (253KB, 528x384px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 528x384px

>>967327
Does watching this film many times count?

>>975687
>the culmination of 400 years of Tudor propaganda

No.

>>975687
Yes, it is the true unaltered account of richards life. Even the machine guns

File: happy birthday.png (83KB, 272x277px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 272x277px

>>967327
The wrong man won that battle desu