>social democracy

File: 1411752304103.jpg (30KB, 380x377px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 380x377px

>democracy

> lazy bait

>>878008
There's absolutely nothing wrong with the form of Social Democracy that works within the logics of capitalism to turn it into your bitch.

Case in point the Nordic model.

File: tangela merkel.jpg (48KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 720x960px

You never hear on the news: 'social democratic dictator murders millions'. It's always the fash and commies who do that.

Checkmate, shitty fanatics.

>>878038
> inb4 some /pol/tard claiming that the long lives of their inhabitants, their high degree of education and the fact that millions of people are risking their lives to get there is somehow proof that these countries are failing.

File: volt.png (638KB, 495x597px) Image search: [Google]

638KB, 495x597px

>"social"
>"democracy"

>>878062
Because they're too pussy to do so. The authoritarians deal with the ditry ends of society while you liberals sit on your high horse complaining

>>878064
http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20160319_02191726?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_term=dso&utm_content=article&utm_campaign=seeding

Lelgium, a social democratic state now has more Muslims than Christians, and then the Brussels attacks happened.

Social Democracy works if everyone is perfect, so only in theory, like Communism. Utopian ideologies full of shit.

>>878431
>Le /pol/ face
>Belgium

Why did you make this thread on /his/?

>>878438
>hurr anyone who disagrees with my utopian socialism is a /pol/lack

And I didn't make this thread.

>>878008
How similar is fascism's economic system to social democracy's economic system?

>>878431
What did that attack have to do with Social Democracies?

>>878431
see how I predicted this line of argumentation?

apparently you people see don't see the inconsistency in arguing that a society so succesfull that people are moving there by the millions should somehow be considered a failure.