should one watch zeitgeist? or is it a shitty conspiracist movie?

It's incredibly shitty, but I find the ideas that they badly attempt to explore interesting.

>the connections between various religions
>technocracy
>post-scarcity economics
etc.

>>862466
This basically, it sows the seeds of interest in these topics but little else.
I have a 25 year old friend who still mentions Zeitgeist, I would have thought he would have found better material by now.

>>862449
incredibly shit.

File: image.gif (56KB, 462x239px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 462x239px

>>862449
Treat it like Chick Tracts: retarded bullshit from people who drink paint thinner and you'll do fine.

Literally meme-tier garbage.

it's fucking horseshit, basically an athiest tries to smush all the religions together and then throws communist + robots into the mix.

Mormons on acid basically.

>>862449
Some flyover state cheeseball mispronouncing words and getting overexcited about coincidences.

Astrology tier, Mormon tier, late night infomercial tier, "eck sedderuh."

Just watch it and decide yourself.

It's great,shows exactly what's wrong with modern society, you should see from all the instant defensive "it's shit just ignore it" mechanism that you're in the right direction.

Peter Joseph has said he is embarrassed by the first zeitgeist with good reason. The other two zeitgeist films are Substantially better. His Culture in Decline series is his best stuff though desu