What are your thoughts?

Depends on the subject.

Can analytic philosophy explain love?

Why do i see people spamming the same fucking shit threads all day?

>>430666
>Can analytic philosophy explain love?

It can, but it depends on what kind of explanation you want. Do you want the scientific explanation, or the phenomenological explanation?

>>430682
I'd probably like the explanation that holds the most meaning to my life

>>430699

Something resonating with the reader is a literary concern much more than it is a philosophical one. An explanation having meaning to your life need not be a reflection of its truth.
What, exactly, is in need of explaining with regard to love?

>believing there is a divide

not event the analytic philosophers believe this. See Quin.

>>430666
>Can analytic philosophy explain love?
https://www.philpapers.org/archive/sinPG

>>430666
Why not?

>>430699
Well then, which is that?

The divide is idiotic.

>>430671
/his/ is literally reddit: the board.

Philosophy without application is completely useless. You might as well be doing Sudoku.

>>432494
Sudoku is the epitome of human thought.

File: Autism.png (518KB, 1242x512px) Image search: [Google]

518KB, 1242x512px

Pic related