if the vikings were such bad warriors how did they sack paris?

>>423234
they weren't bad warriors

>>423236
This is a bait thread. Just look at the picture

>>423234
Frenchies saw scary Viking man and raised white flag.

Viking man raped French girl, and begat Napoleon.

File: 1444280870094.gif (92KB, 265x310px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 265x310px

>>423240
you're right
>Vikings with horns
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>423240
literal vikings with horns

File: vik.png (188KB, 325x766px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 325x766px

>>423234
Paris was undefended when they successfully sacked it in 845
Then they tried again in 885 and got BTFO

>>423274
btfo so hard the french king gave them land

sure

>>423278
Holy shit, I bet you learned history with the dumb inaccurate show....
The Normans got Normandy in 911 (26 years after Paris) following their defeat at the Siege of Chartres in 911 (yes, they received Normandy after a defeat).

Since you seem to use THAT show to learn history, let me tell you a fun fact that may avoid you to ridicule yourself again in a further debate: Rollo wasn't Ragnar's brother, they didnt even live in the same era

>>423274
>Franks: 200 men at arms
>Vikings: 700 ships, 40,000 men
>Decisive French Victory

LOL

>>423274
>200 vs 40k
Sounds realistic

>>423537
>>423540
Siege warfare

>>423540
40k always fucks up things up.