So, how long did humans keep their African features once they

File: 1448132884370s.jpg (6KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 250x250px

>implying

>>416451
Oh come on, it's not even like that anon. I was just curious.

File: finn.jpg (51KB, 658x364px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 658x364px

Looks more Finnish than African desu

>>416405
Define "African features"

>>416405
Consider that contemporaneous Africans are not the same as the Africans of 70,000 years ago.

>>416475
What about Omo 1? Wasn't there a reconstruction of his skull that looked like a Black African?

Now, on a genetic scale, they're not the same by far, as that was 195,000 years ago.

File: we-are-nilotic-nykhor-paul-s.jpg (97KB, 747x703px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 747x703px

>>416474
What people generally assume Africans to look like (which isn't completely accurate, as there are exceptions to the norm all over).

I guess you could say something like this?

>>416405
>Pic related ancient Israeli woman about 70,000 years old.

yeah you cant really reconstruct a face based on the skull

>>416576
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_facial_reconstruction

http://anthropology.si.edu/writteninbone/facial_reconstruction.html

How else do you think we know what other human species looked like?

>>416612
if you actually were to look into the links you provided you'd know that there is a lot of guesswork going on

You should probably ask /sci/