There is literally nothing wrong with mob rule

Yes there is

>>395411
oppresses the rights of the minority

>>396207
>implying we don't have tyranny of the minority in 2015

File: 1449684936993-pol.jpg (120KB, 1200x595px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1200x595px

>>396207
Why not have no minorities to "oppress"?

>>395411
>this is what anarcho-syndicalists believe in

Get fucked, you twat.

To paraphrase Winston Churchill:

It's not that there is nothing wrong with it. It's just that it's better than every alternative.

Well if you like your country ran by retards then sure.

Having to deal with retards is bad enough in a republican democracy.

Beyond diversification of the autocrat, theres no point ib spreading power more.

>>396458
The quote is even better than that, it goes:

"Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time"

>>395411
w2cop

>>396519
>>396558
These

Most people are, how shall I say this, unfit to rule? Ignorant?

>implying there is nothing wrong with rule

>>396880
>tips fedora

>>395411
>There is literally nothing wrong with mob rule
This is correct. There is literally nothing wrong with any human action. There is no "third standpoint" unless you believe in an external divine source, or the possibility of a stable deontology.

And even then, you can't demonstrate the universality of your moral or political position.

Which leads back to: there is nothing wrong with anything.

So either read ethics and start posting about consequentialism or take your shit posting to >>>/pol/ where undemonstrable moral and political positions aren't just allowed, they're encouraged.

I hope you're shot in the fucking neck.