Is History a lie?

File: varuna.jpg (52KB, 500x328px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 500x328px

>>35669
I don't know, you tell me.

>>35669

doesnt look like a stegosaurus. the head is very different. maybe they reconstructed/did guess work from some bones, or maybe it was a different species of lizard that is extinct now. i love alternative history theories, but there is no way that such a recent temple would have a dinosaur on it, even if they did copy earlier sources.

File: hqdefault[1].jpg (38KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 480x360px

>>35669
That looks like a stegoceratops.

>>35669
Checkmate atheists

>>35669
According to this logic dragons, unicorns, djins, centaurs and big foot should exist only becose someone had the imagination of an animal never seen by anyone. its just a lucky shot that one from millons of mythological animals looks like an actual existing animal from the past

>>35669
>>35669
It's a rhinoceros on background of leaves you mong.

Also it looks nothing like Stegosaurus, more like the flawed 19th century reconstruction of it.

>>37378
You dumb fucking indoctrinated retarded piece of shit.

>>38275
Are you one of these "le open minded different type of intelligence" mongs by any chance?

Why do you assume it is impossible for ancient civilizations to have found fossils and reconstruct them enough to assume illustrations of ancient creatures?

it's on sumerian friezes, egyptian friezes, incan burial stones as well.

they used to call them "dragons"

>>40290
[citation needed]

File: xenomorph-alien_00382970.jpg (693KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

693KB, 1920x1080px

One day, humans will find something that looks an awful lot like pic related, and they will wonder if we had any contact with the creature, since clearly no one man could've imagined a creature so accurately to an actual living thing.

I think the phrase
"History is a set of lies agreed upon."
is very true

>>35669
because dinosaurs are rad, duh