Do you think less of someone if they're a historylet?

I think less of anyone who are not me

>>3397214
Everyone's a history-let as long as you find the correct portion of history to ask them about.

>>3397214
I try to be civil towards everyone I meet. Unless I am on the internet.

File: 1495477062970.jpg (170KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1920x1080px

>Oh, you like WW2, anon? Isn't it cool how close the Nazis were to winning?

>>3397214
I think less of /his/

does that count?

>>3397214
Yes, and, though not to the same extent, if they're philosophically illiterate. People have personal preference when it comes to interests, but having an attitude to philosophy or history that denotes it being either meaningless or just "not for them" makes you a moron.

File: 05a1a6f5706be728b61e34461c705c759aead3d39a0c785613be9829b82bbfa8.jpg (47KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 720x960px

>thinks he is smart because when knows what the Marginot Line is
>LUL anschluss amiright?
>Thank God for the Soviets, fucking based, by why invade Finland?
The worst historylets are those who think they know history but in reality know jack shit.

>>3397259
this.

I knew a girl once who believed that the Berlin wall was built to keep the jews out of Germany.

I look down on everyone who is not (can't find a better word) curious about the world. I think the world is a pretty big and colourful place, that includes history as well. Not being interested in stuff is pretty dumb.

>>3397214
I think less of people who think history is boring

>>3397219
fpbp

Yes I think less of /pol/tards