what did history mean by this?

>>3392330
>people attending of their own volition
>vs people attending because they're in the army and their commanders told them that's what they were doing that day

File: AP_661026036.jpg (1MB, 1680x1160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1680x1160px

You do realize any American president could do that if he made it mandatory for a good amount of soldiers to show up? Correct?

>>3392330
People would go see everything to not be bored before the invention of TV and internet.

>>3392339
That picture is from 1933 right when NSDAP won the elections. Nuremberg was a huge Nazi supporting city. The Reichswehr (Army) was still impartial and didn't really trust the Nazis yet.

The German Army in 1933 didn't even have enough men to cover that area in the picture.

You are wrong as fuck sir.

>>3392339
Its not the army those are all SA and SS

File: The Thinking Bait.png (26KB, 527x409px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 527x409px

>>3392367

File: CwbtXwbWQAAajfc-1.jpg (123KB, 654x372px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 654x372px

>>3392330
America wins again

>>3392371
No they aren't the majority of people are literally just Nazi voters. Nuremberg rallies were a big yearly event and drew Nazi fans from all over Germany.

This board is full of retards.

File: his.jpg (1MB, 2456x1724px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2456x1724px

>>3392330
What did /his mean by this?

>>3392375
Literally prove me wrong.

>Oh no I got btfo. I know, I'll just claim he's trolling

>>3392330
Probly something about perspective.

>Nuremberg 1934: 700k
>Obama 2009: 1.8M
>Obama 2013: 1M
>Trump: 700-900k

File: 2004 Boston.jpg (764KB, 1024x685px) Image search: [Google]

764KB, 1024x685px

>>3392384
Cubs pls

>>3392398
You proved absolutely nothing. Not to mention the Nuremberg rallies were attended by members of the Nazi party, which were primarily Paramilitary SA