Let's say they fended off the Roman invasion, what happens next? I'd assume Caesar would be tried for not only waging his illegal war but losing it and humiliating Rome in the process but how would the rest of Rome react? Would they still want vengeance against the people who sacked their capital hundreds of years ago or would they prefer peace with the Celts?
How would this affect Rome in the long run? On the one hand they don't have to spend so much money and manpower civilising their northern neighbours but on the other hand they'd miss out on the soldiers and materials gotten from them.
Where would they spend time if not for western Europe now? Advance deeper into the Balkans? Arabia? Persia? Explore deeper into Africa?
And what of the Gauls? Would they try invading Iberia or would they not want to try their luck against Rome again? Push east into Germanic tribes? Or take Britain? Would their common Celtic culture make it easier for them to assimilate other Celitc areas?
>>3377429
French would sound even more gay.
>>3377449
French would behead you in the name of Lugh
>>3377429
>Would they try invading Iberia or would they not want to try their luck against Rome again? Push east into Germanic tribes? Or take Britain?
We already all of that
Where do you think the Celtiberians, Britons and Eastern Celts came from
>>3377497
Nah, he would surrender in the name of Lugh.
That's French tradition, to surrender.
>>3377536
>t. butthurt Anglo
>>3377515
>we
>>3377515
Tribal migrations aren't the same thing as a kingdom annexing land.
>>3377546
Nothing to be butthurt about. You're speaking English lmao.
>>3377555
True
But the Bituriges united the Gauls under Ambigatos and that led to the conquest of Northern Italy
An united Gaul is invicible
Why don't you ask this of the Greeks?