Which was the best Persian Dynasty and why was it the Parthians?

>>3364409
Parthians weren't Persian you dumbass

>>3364409
>Parthians
>Post Shapur I
And why doggos???

File: C-j_JT_UMAAp6ZQ.jpg (186KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1200x800px

>>3364418
Lots of dynasty are foreign.

>>3364420
>And why doggos???
Why indeed ....

>>3364444
But it was a PARTHIAN empire, not a PERSIAN empire

>>3364457
Im not the fur fag who drew that.

File: Sardar_Qasem_Soleimani-01.jpg (17KB, 220x334px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 220x334px

>>3364409
parthian is the worst, sas ach, even saf were better

>>3364409
Parthians were fucking dogshit. Half of the noble families sided with the Arabs against the Sassanids, which decisively swung the odds towards the Arabs.

>>3364409
because they were Turks and not P*rsians, meaning they weren't autistic barbarians and actually gave a degree of religious freedom to their vassal states

>>3364595
>>3364600

Shit meme.

>>3364409
Parthians are the Scots to the Persians English. Also how are they the best when they largely were on the defensive against the Romans and were more politically and militarily unstable compared to the Sassanid dynasty?

Also why are you a furfag?

>>3364600
>>3364556
Also fuck off.

Parthians were Armenian

>>3364658
Fuck off.

>>3364409
>Persian Dynasty
you mean iranian dinasty
>>3364618
you know its sad how history went, if achaemenid or parthias conquered central asia and united all the iranians tribes then alexander wouldnt have happened or in parthian cases, romans wouldnt have conquered west asia

>>3364699
Fuck off.