my ancestors :)

File: 653e7162d1dec186772aa5d92a12b2c8.jpg (93KB, 600x444px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 600x444px

>>3360038
My ancestors thread?

File: 152341112.jpg (7KB, 272x186px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 272x186px

>>3360595
Oprichniki my guy

File: 1504955585926.jpg (3MB, 1799x1471px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1799x1471px

>>3360038
My ancestors' symbols :)

File: 1d2c7993cf54608c1ac0993591bba5ea.jpg (72KB, 500x637px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 500x637px

My ancestor :)

>>3360038
nordic barbarian....

File: image.jpg (52KB, 663x513px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 663x513px

meow ancestor

File: bas_relief_warrior_hi.jpg (68KB, 450x665px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 450x665px

My ancestors

File: artefato-antigo-wallpaper-24698.jpg (69KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 800x600px

>>3361010
masterace

>>3360925
How did they know his skin color?

>>3361010
>>3361384
<<Master race>> Didn't know how wheels worked till the spaniards came LMAO

>>3361390
They checked his criminal record.

>>3361627
Is that 2 dudes and 6 more dudes in drag? wtf

who cares lmao. But poor nordic farmers/fishermen.

>>3361463
So, white?

>>3361408
Oh yeah they did, but they were useless without horses. Also they reached America 15000 years after europeans settle on europe.

So, Master Race.

>>3361680
No, argentinian

File: Paul_Jamin___Le_Brenn_et_sa_part_de_butin_1893.jpg (536KB, 709x843px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 709x843px

My ancestor :)

File: Los Trece de la Fama, represent.jpg (629KB, 941x629px) Image search: [Google]

629KB, 941x629px

Literally my ancestors

File: 11th Mississippi Gettysburg.jpg (473KB, 1400x890px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 1400x890px

My ancestors

>>3361684
> wheels were useless without horses
What are wheelbarrows?
What are llamas?
What are alpacas?
What are slaves/servants/paid workers?

Its easy to see that the apple does not fall far from the tree in terms of intelligence

> They reached America 15000 years after europeans settled europe
Im not even going to fact check this, but why the fuck does that matter? What the fuck were they doing that entire time? It wasnt just walking cuz they would have gotten there way earlier even without the wheel.

Even after your people were propelled thousands of years into the future in terms of technology your countries are still raging shitholes. The only thing you guys have mastered is poverty.

File: 1200px-Raatajat_rahanalaiset.jpg (296KB, 1200x960px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 1200x960px

My ancestors

File: dolmio.jpg (53KB, 599x365px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 599x365px

>>3361755
Wheels already existed in mesoamerica.
>wheelbarrows
>The earliest wheelbarrows with archaeological evidence in the form of a one-wheel cart come from 2nd century Han Dynasty Emperor Hui's tomb murals and brick tomb reliefs.
>llamas in mesoamerica
>literally undomesticated horses already could carry a human and weighted at least 400kg
>undomesticated llamas weighted less than 90kg
>alpacas even worse

>What are slaves/servants/paid workers?
>The first evidence of wheeled vehicles appears in the second half of the 4th millennium BCE, near-simultaneously in Mesopotamia (Sumerian civilization), the Northern Caucasus (Maykop culture) and Central Europe (Cucuteni-Trypillian culture), so the question of which culture originally invented the wheeled vehicle is still unsolved.
>slaves didn't exist before the invention of the wheel

>why the fuck does it matter?
What do you think eurasians were doing before the wheel?

>Im not even going to fact check this
Probably because you don't check anything hmm...
>raging shitholes
>90% genocide
>elites and middle class murdered
>the rest assimilated by europeans
>the low class were thrown to toxic mines with an extremely low life expectancy for 4 centuries
Hmm...

It's obvious my ancestors were superior. Your little brainlet cannot comprehend it, though.

File: 1485141256001.png (524KB, 433x558px) Image search: [Google]

524KB, 433x558px

My ancestor ;)

>>3360604
Alans > visigoths

File: celtic-warriors.jpg (43KB, 370x248px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 370x248px

My ancestors :))

>>3361792
you really are mentally challenged, I feel bad now.
I realize that wheelbarrows existed way early, which is why you guys should have had them by the time Europeans got to you.
Despite other quadrapeds not being as strong as horses, they could still be used for labor as they were in other societies.
Why are you talking about the origination of slaves and wheels? The point is you had slaves but did not use wheels.

Also, despite this being completely irrelevant and idk why you would even bring it up, slaves definitely existed before wheels because slaves existed as soon as one person could physically submit another.

> the white man kept us down
Are you seriously implying that latin america would be better off now if they were not colonized by Spain/Portugal?

Your ancestors were superior only to africansm, some of which were probably also your ancestors.

File: 1e34f55dd95d4e89130f8cacb338619d--armenia-art-art.jpg (120KB, 457x600px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 457x600px

My ancestors :v)

File: celtic pride.png (17KB, 367x461px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 367x461px

>>3361850
Somethings aren't meant to be proud of

File: 1652_KERMESS_TENIERS.jpg (63KB, 562x318px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 562x318px

moi ancestors bruv ;)

>>3361852
>I realize
Hmm...
>they could still be used for labor as they were in other societies
The first "animal" carrying a wheeled vehicle, where did it happen?
>slaves definitely existed before wheels
Which demonstrates that the existence of slaves doesn't have anything to do with the general use of the wheel.
>the white man kept us down
Actually I think that process was benefitial, that's why I think "white" "people" should live the same, it will be good for their genes.

>Your ancestors were superior
To europeans. All development was faster compared to them. It probably didn't reach the brainlet land of unitedstates though.

File: 110815_r21179_g2048-1200-1080x1032.jpg (167KB, 1080x1032px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1080x1032px

My EUROPEAN ancestor
We wuz native europeans and shite

>>3361861

ROMAN SCUM >/OUT/
SAXON SCUM >>>>/OUT/

PLAID CYMRU

>>3360595
are these Cossacks or some kind of Caucasus people?

>>3360600
what the fuck is that head? A dog?

>>3361890
Cossacks. And yes!

File: fuck puerto rico.png (72KB, 998x1267px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 998x1267px

>>3361869
> hmmm
Seek help, you are dumb for real. I'm not even joking this time.
> First animal carrying a wheeled vehicle, where did it happen?
Thats not something we will ever know because it is so broad, but it would probably be in the first civilization to have the wheel which at this point seems to be early mesopotamia or their ancestors. Which is estimated at around 4000BCE.
Other animals that could be used are oxen, water buffalo, deer, and donkeys.
>Which demonstrates that the existence of slaves doesn't have anything to do with the general use of the wheel.
Except that if you didn't have access to the animals that I have previously brought up you could use humans you retard. YOU. CAN. USE. SLAVES. TO. PULL. WHEELED. VEHICLES. So the excuse that you didn't have horses is retarded.

> All development was faster compared to Europeans
Oh right I forgot, how your people came to Europe on tech they have never seen, conquered them almost effortlessly, enslaved and colonized them, and then taught them the language. Thats why were are all speaking Nahuan at the moment.

>>3361929
>cringeball
Hmm...
>Thats not something we will ever know because it is so broad
>All evidences are from civilizations with a plain focused agriculture
>oxen, water buffalo and donkeys
>all of them had a high capacity of pulling before being domesticated
>deer
Hmm...
>YOU. CAN. USE. SLAVES. TO. PULL. WHEELED. VEHICLES.
>slaves definitely existed before wheels
Then why isn't there wheels from 20kBC or earlier? You just said slaves existed before wheels. Omg you must be united statian, no doubt.

>came to Europe on tech they have never seen
>15000 years of offset
Hmm...
>conquered
>numerous diseases and epidemics with 90% of mortality
Hmm...
>nahuan
Millions are speaking native languages. What's your point? Do you mean that in 50 years from now muslims will be superior to europeans because they will replace them and the majority will speak arab?
Hmm...

Our superiority is a historical fact. All data you bring here is literally memes. Have you ever read a book? pffft

File: 2afe9be53de479746409c65d925b7ca8.jpg (112KB, 736x842px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 736x842px

my ancestor

>>3361968
at the point it is evident you are trolling cuz no one is this dumb

>Then why isn't there wheels from 20kBC or earlier? You just said slaves existed before wheels. Omg you must be united statian, no doubt.
Having wheels does not mean you will have slaves. Having slaves does not mean that you will have wheels. The point is that humanity dscovered both. You had slaves but did not have wheels. When this was brought up you gave the arguement that you had no animals to operate wheeled vehicles. I brought up humans. You then autisticly started asking when slaves and wheels were discovered.

>15000 years of offset
This bitch wants a 15000 year handicap on development cuz his people travelled across the bering strait. No everyone is help to the same standard you loser. As already mentioned, development does not stop while people migrate, and it certainly doent take 15000 years to travel from Iran to fucking mexico.

> millions are speaking native languages
no they arent

> If muslims replace europeans and the majority will speak arab does that mean they are superior.
Yes, you idiot. If you allow yourself to get completely dominated by another civilization they are completely superior. Why does everyone want to be like Rome and no one wants to be like Carthage? Why do so many people study Germany and Russia, but no one wants to be like Poland?

>>3362014
>The point is that humanity dscovered both
It's simple. The wheels remnants show that it was actually a conceptual invention, that was spread all over the eurasian zone, but wasn't actually generally used, until horses were domesticated. It was probably due to the irregular terrain between villages and other tribes, that made it difficult to carry them, even though they lived on plains, it was an even worse scenario in Assyria and their mountainous land. That's why the rest of the eurasian cultures didn't use them. Even britain natives didn't use them until some years before christ.

Mesoamerican villages had jungles and rivers between them. The irregular land was even worse on the land where llamas were domesticated.
> development does not stop while people migrate
Archeological evidence demonstrates otherwise. 14000BC amerindian "technology" is literally similar to 30000BC southern european "technology".
>no they arent
pic related
See? The cringeball demonstrates you are a kid, jeez this board is doomed.
>completely dominated
The "conquest" finished when spaniards killed the big states, the rest of the natives had terrains and had treats with europeans before assimilating their families.

>Why does everyone want to be like Rome and no one wants to be like Carthage?
Maybe you are right, if everybody knows "white" ""supremacy"" is a joke, they might have a great sense of judgement.

All amerindian technology development was superior, then the diseases happened and most of them died. That's all that happened to the natives. The rest is "europeans" making up "legends" of the "conquistadors" that today are being proven wrong. I wonder why would people like fairy tales...

File: mayan languages.png (15KB, 805x148px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 805x148px

>>3362060

The Incatard claims another thread. RIP.

>>3362060
> Mesoamerican villages had jungles and rivers between them. The irregular land was even worse on the land where llamas were domesticated.
I guess land clearing is a concept no one thought of

> 14000BC amerindian "technology" is literally similar to 30000BC southern european "technology".
Thats my point. You argue its due to migration. I argue that it doesn't matter. The choice to migrate was theirs, it was a bad one and one that cost them 15000 years. I am not going to spare them 15000 years of development because they made a bad desicion.
> wikipedia quote
Ok I concede to the millions speaking mayan languages. But I was speaking generally meaning not a lot of people speak it. Which in a world of 7.5 billion, 6 million is quite insignificant.

>the rest of the natives had terrains and had treats with europeans before assimilating their families
Thats still being dominated by another culture

> if everybody knows "white" ""supremacy"" is a joke, they might have a great sense of judgement.
I'm not coming at this from a white supremacist angle. I'm not a white supremacist. You were the one that started with the master race speak. I am simply saying that your peeps were way behind in development. Europe, India, the Middle east, and East Asia were waaaaaay ahead. Not to mention that East asia did not settle long before the Americas were settled.

> legends" of the conquistadors
Well documented colonization vs. a few written manuscripts by natives and the rest is just anthropological conjecture. K.

File: kerns and gall óglaidh.jpg (291KB, 979x740px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 979x740px

:--)

>>3360038
>WE WUZ VIKANGZ N SHEIT

>>3362135
>I guess land clearing is a concept no one thought of
What do you think eurasians were doing with 15000 years of offset?
>The choice to migrate was theirs
And they even achieved what eurasians did in less time. It's pretty simple. Who is better, a child genius with potential or a mediocre grown man. Hmm...
>Which in a world of 7.5 billion
The Amerindian land is what counts though, they didn't lost the language. Didn't you want to "prove" that they spoke spanish or something? hehe
>Thats still being dominated by another culture
Actually the consequence is a mix of both with more native influences of both. United states isn't the world you know?
>master race speak
Because we are superior.
>east asia
>The fossilized teeth of Homo sapiens (dated to 125,000–80,000 years ago) have been discovered in Fuyan Cave in Dao County, Hunan.
>America 25000BC in Canada, the rest of the continent in 14000BC
Nope.
>I am simply saying that your peeps were way behind in development. Europe, India, the Middle east, and East Asia were waaaaaay ahead.
Actually they were way behind. Knowing that Amerindians had an offset of 15000 years.

>well documented
>lacks most archeological evidence
Just mentioning the south-american "conquista" just shows you that horses and european weaponry was irrelevant, so all battles until the last years of resistance shows native weapon caused deaths to the skeletons. All natives even had constant epidemics yet they resisted the europeans easily. Meanwhile the diseases kept fucking up with them. Most of this is omitted by the "conquistadors" records. The textil and relics from the cities and capitals were burnt and the gold and bronze melted.

In mesoamerica the remnants show that europeans were even more savage that the aztecs lmao. Even though the aztecs were an exception compared to the other cultures like the Maya, toltecs and olmecs.

In the other hand european subhumanism is demonstrated by their genes, they are literally killing themselves heh

>>3362146
>That hair
JUST

File: cells.gif (91KB, 497x407px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 497x407px

My ancestor (on the right) :)

>>3362537
>Thylakoids
>Cell wall
>On /his/ nobody knows that you're a Plant

File: article-2045992-0E41D38A00000578-878_468x366.jpg (81KB, 468x366px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 468x366px

My ancestor :)

>>3362582
Just LOL @animalcucks having to eat fellow eukaryotes

File: aHR0cDovL3d3dy5saXZlc2NpZW5jZS5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2kvMDAwLzAyNS84Nzcvb3JpZ2luYWwvYWxpZW5zLUVULmpwZw==.jpg (54KB, 660x483px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 660x483px

My ancestors :^)

>>3362201
> What do you think eurasians were doing with 15000 years of offset?
There you go again, you can use that as an excuse but I don't buy it. I jugde everyone by the time they are in because they are in the state they are in due to their own action. Europeans at the time had already cultivated agriculture and land clearly. Your entire world view is justified because your ancestors were "travelling" for 15000 years taking new resources as they moved along, instead of cultivating new tech. You confirm my arguement every time you say that.

> achieved what eurasians did in less time
Because the eurasians showed them how to do it
> Didn't you want to "prove" that they spoke spanish or something? hehe
No, I made my point. You are just an idiot.

> Actually the consequence is a mix of both with more native influences of both. United states isn't the world you know?
The native influence is very minor. We have been speaking about latin america this entire time professor. You are the only one who ever brings up the US.


>Actually they were way behind. Knowing that Amerindians had an offset of 15000 years.
lol. Keep telling yourself that. Its really pathetic.
"Why werent the natives as advanced as Europeans?"
"IF ONLY THEY HAD 15000 MORE YEARS THEY WOULD BE!"
"....k"

> In mesoamerica the remnants show that europeans were even more savage that the aztecs lmao
WE WUZ CIVILIZED AND SHIT despite being admittedly 15000 years behind. WE ACTUALLY COLONIZED OURSELVES.

I am so glad I was not born where you were, holy shit.

>this guy
American education everyone

File: hqdefault.jpg (60KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 480x360px

>>3360038
my ancestors ;) bloody barbarians

>>3362146
fookin irish

>>3362695
>excuse
Wrong. Woods and jungles were everywhere near the coasts of south-europe and north-africa/some zones of the middle east. The archeological evidence shows that the fauna demographics changed over time and some especies got extinct thanks to human presence. This process of collectors-hunters was the same in the Americas.
>taking new resources as they moved along
>migration
All wrong. Early european spread show no development at all as their population occupy the rest of south europe. Nomadic migration shows that the cultural preservation is volatile. And it's demonstrated again in America.

>Because the eurasians showed them how to do it
Wrong. Amerindians started again from the beginning as the archeological remnants show, and developed with less time, major achievements.
>my point
Which was to remark native language as extinct, which is completely false.
>native influence is minor
Wrong. All agricultural and familiar based culture remained in the low class, and the hierarchical organization was literally used when the "conquistadors" arrived. The viceroyalty even used many province based administration from the natives and built on the cities that were already populated by natives.

>lol
Hmm...
>15000 years behind
Wrong. The arrival had an offset of 15000 years, however the offset was reduced by the amerindians to 4000 years. That's why Amerindians developed at a faster rate, showing their technological superiority compared to europeans.

It's pretty simple. A civilization with a higher development rate, like the Amerindians, is better than one with a mediocre "development" rate, like europeans.

>>3363024
So whats your prediction on the remaining Amerinidians become a superpower or even world power? And when will they into space?

>>3363124
The remaining amerindians got cucced to death and the only pure remaining ones are deep in the jungle barely connected to nearby towns and doesnt help much of those that hid deep in the jungle were from the lowest class as well. They arent going anywhere until the latam goverments decide to stop pretending they dont exist which wont happen soon.

>>3363124
>90% epidemic disease genocide for 2 centuries
>elites and middle class murdered
>rest of the priviledged class assimilated
>low class thrown to toxic mines for 2 centuries
The amerindian civilization ended when the diseases arrived and demographically destroyed the empires. It could have remained effective, yet the social selection and the change for 4 centuries have affected natives and the ones who succeded were assimilated by eurangutans.

>modern comparison
Now that we agree with Amerindian superiority, now we can put europeans under the same treatment and see what happens, right? Then we will compare which one of them will go to Mars. hehe
>>3363146
The eurangutan genes don't reach most villages. They affect mostly capital cities and villages near the coast.

File: 1504905649366.jpg (840KB, 1270x1136px) Image search: [Google]

840KB, 1270x1136px

>>3363166
>>elites and middle class murdered
Dont go full pic related, we all know most elites were allowed to conserve some power.
>eurangutans
You shouldnt say such things outside of /int/, stop your european hate boner.

>>3363198
Wrong. The Inca empire had a militar elite. The sucesion war killed some of the royal families, yet the arrival of the spanish spread a lethal bunch of diseases which killed most villages and depopulated some cities from the empire. After the "conquest" all cultural remnants were burnt and the metal art was melted, the cultural prohibitions started and all royal families who didn't obey were murdered. The rest were assimilated over time.

All of it were written in the records.

>>3363228
I tought you were that delusional mexiposter of /int/ and Im not too sure about the Incas but at least from the aztecs and the other native empires it wasnt as bad other than getting their entire culture removed to become subjugated to catholicism and the crown. We had a lot of priests that fought for rights of the natives and got them a better treatment.

>>3363250
That's the point I was making with the treatment.
>90% epidemic disease genocide for 2 centuries
>elites and middle class murdered
>rest of the priviledged class assimilated
>low class thrown to toxic mines for 2 centuries
Of course there will be people trying to comfort eurangutans, there are always people like that. However, it's only fair to compare such populations after they go through the same treatment. After all, it was benefitial, sot why fear it?

>>3363146
>>3363166
Claim to be master race. When asked how soon their inevitable return would be if they are indeed so superior, they openly adimt that they were BTFO too hard.
Dude you suck at debating for your people.
> admitted you were 15000 years behind
> admitted you were BTFO so hard you can't return despite your superhuman abilities

Russia:
> unindustrialized in 1880, 83% of population illiterate newly free serfs
> by 1980 competing with the US militarily and economically with a unique form of government after the fastest industrial development at the time despite going through 4 major wars. Also they made it to space.

Germany:
> Fucked to shit with economic constraints in WWI
> by WWII basically becomes a superpower

Japan:
> 1890 bunch of sword weilding tribesman on an island
>1944 conquered most of east asia

Mongols
> 1200 shitty nomadic tribe
> 1400 conquered argueably the greatest empire ever

Surely the Amerinidians with their natural genius and everyone's access to information and cheap industry these days should be able to become a world power in at most 200 years. I might be underestimating them again. Let me know.

>>3363286
Simple.
Europeans settle on europe: 40000BC
Amerindians reached Canada: 25000BC; then after the deglaciation (10000 years later) populated the rest of the continent in 15000BC

European crops date from 10000BC.
Amerindian crops date from 6000BC.

Europeans getting the bronze from other culture in 3200BC.
Amerindians reached the bronze age in 500BC approximately.

Also as a great factor:
Horse domesticated in 3000BC approximately.

Knowing that the rests of all amerindian populations of 14000BC to 10000BC were pretty much paleolithical-tier and all lived as nomads, practiced some artistic manifestations as european paleo-populations. It's safe to assume they started again in the paleolithic and had to morph the environment of woods, jungles and coasts to their convenience, the same the europeans did with their environment for thousands of years before the Neolithic.

Then let's compare:
Europeans lurking around as nomads: 30000 years.
Amerindians lurking around as nomads: 9000 years.

Europeans reaching the bronze age from other cultures after the Neolithic stage: 6800 years.
Amerindians reaching the bronze age by themselves without the influence of a culture thousands of years ahead of development: 5500 years.

Let's check also how many years have humans modifyed the horse population and environment: 37000 years.
Let's check how many years have amerindians affected the camelids of South-America, when the spaniards came: 16500 years. They had less than half the time, yet they already domesticated diverse species for food and whool. Llamas can carry up to 50 Kg.

And I didn't mention the disadvantages such as continental isolation (north-south and east-west), Niño fenomena that destroys coastal villages, less cultures to trade with, and no naval technology, iron, horses, wheel, and writting from north-african nor anatolian cultures.

So, it's safe to affirm. Incas were superior to europeans. Their higher development rate was excellent compare to europeans.

Do you think this guy is trolling or he's mentally ill?

>>3363286
>post genocide comparison
So you agree with Inca superiority? Then if you want to compare modern populations let's put eurangutans under the same amerindian treatment:
>90% epidemic disease genocide for 2 centuries
>elites and middle class murdered
>rest of the priviledged class assimilated
>low class thrown to toxic mines for 4 centuries
Then we can compare both, don't you agree?
>>3363302
hehe
How did you get that?

>>3363304
Rejecting historical facts is actually normal for ideology followers. What do you expect from an eurangutans?

>>3363315
You posted it on the other thread, and it resumes important info from the other texts on hispa ;)

>>3363304
I dont know why /pol/tards and such go into a hard denial whenever the native american empires are mentioned. I have seen this so many times it stopped being funny
>why were they so behind?
>actually they werent
>they were a pretty good civilization
>NAH THEN WHAT ABOUT THE WHEEL AND IRON
>start a shitstorm that whenever they get something refuted they move the goalpost to something else
>>3363302
>Incas were superior to europeans
PeruANO, you should stop calling them like that because something something horseshoe theory

>>3363320
Seek help dude.

>>3363336
Nice so we can agree with Inca superiority.
>>3363333
I made an observation about the arrival of amerindians to America, then some eurangutans started chimping out. He was probably united statian. Then you see here the result of constant eurangutan accusations and their daily failed attempts at intellectual dishonesty and goalshifting. No wonder their "society" is decaying.

>>3363315
How could such a superior people become subjugated to genocide for 2 centuries, become assimilated into a lesser culture, be so suscpetible to disease, and be forced into toxic mines still?
The europeans went back and forth. Yet they didn't die out to the diseases you guys had. Strange.

>>3363302
You do realize we all started out in the same place, right? Amerindians werent created out of nothing. They were a group that split off. A group that was rediscovered thousands of years later to be found to have accomplished jack shit. You can use the excuse of walking and weather to justify your retardation, but I am judging your society on all its choices. If travelling for 15000 years is what put you 15000 years behind then maybe you shouldnt have done that.

Your whole premise is based on people giving you the handicap of 15000 years like thats a normal comparison. Its not our fault you guys decide to tard around for 15000 years instead of build civilization. Now you have to accept the consequences.

>>3363333
Claiming Mesoamerican civilizations were superior to Europeans in 16th century is so fucking idiotic there is no place for debate here. I'm not a /pol/tard, this is just fucking reality. Even this mental cripple realizes this and spergs out about "higher development rate", whatever that means.

File: Incatard.png (35KB, 264x344px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 264x344px

>>3363366
>>3363302
>>3363320

>>3363373
>Mesoamerican
Meant to write "native American".

>>3363373
Im not sure if that retard is saying that but the general consensus is that mesoamericans were pretty great for an isolated left behind civilization which was just on its "bronze age" when discovered. Which for a reason triggers europeans into saying how could they be on par with romans and greeks (not the other early civilizations like egyptians or babilonians or chinese, just those two).

>>3363385
I never implied anything like that nor did anyone. Those were interesting societies. But this lunatic just barges into random threads and screeches about Inca superiority, and claiming they were superior is just schizophrenic.

>>3363368
>Yet they didn't die out to the diseases you guys had. Strange.
This eurangutan doesn't know about the herder and animal domestication epidemics...
>we all started in the same place
It's simple. Their development was supremely higher compared to europeans. You can put eurangutans in a jungle for 100.000 years and they would stay in their mudhuts without the middle east and anatolian cradles of civilization, meanwhile America developed faster without those influences. The point is self-evident, as history demonstrates. Amerindian development was higher compared to europeans. Don't you agree?
>>3363373
>higher development rate", whatever that means
If your brainlet can't understand eurangutan "english" language, what are you doing here, chimp?

>>3363398
I dont know if it were you on >>3363368 and his other posts but both guys are pretty fucking retarded. The anti natives is talking out of his ass and the incatard is sucking too hard the incas dick. And the
>Which for a reason triggers europeans into saying how could they be on par with romans and greeks (not the other early civilizations like egyptians or babilonians or chinese, just those two).
Happens too often on here and in /int/ whenever the natives are mentioned which turns into a similar shitstorm.
But also to be fair, the american guy started it because he trashtalked the other anon when he posted master race with that solar calendar which was Aztec but for a reason he decided to wank off to incas

>>3363410
"Development rate" would imply progress is linear and constant, and it is not.
I'm saying this for other people here, you're clearly insane. I wonder how someone becomes like that.

>>3363446
>progress is linear and constant
The point is: All kinds of POV lead to the same conclusion. Amerindians in 14000BC had technology from 30000BC europe. Both had the same start at that point. Amerindians achieved more in less time. That's where the "development rate" comes from. Don't you agree?

>>3363379
Who made this?

>>3363410
No, I don't agree. There is no reason to have an experiment where both amerindians and europeans started in the same place because that already happened. We both started in the same place then branched off. Thats it period.

>>3363439
Why was I retarded? I am simply jugding both people from the start of existance and he is judging from the start of settling an area. I happen to think that is an important distinction. Take away the "if ony we had 15000 years" and his entire arguement is invalid. That's all I am saying. All my points are valid, he has not refuted any of them aside from the fact that technically 6 million people speak nahuan. My point in terms of that was that almost no one speaks it, which still holds true.

>>3363559
>if ony we had 15000 years
That's wrong. It's pretty clear the distinction. A higher development rate is the natural distinction of nature. Unless you support might makes right which leads to supporting the decadence of europe today.

>started in the same place
Amerindians didn't exist nor europeans, that's the same as saying you are niggers. Amerindian genes started differentiating themselves when they entered from Siberia. Even then, the early settlers diverge from amerindians from all the rest of the continent. The basis are simple. Amerindians started existing when they reached America as their genetic differences increased thanks to the continental isolation.

The same as the differences between european and sub-saharan genes.

As I said before, Amerindian development was higher compared to europeans. All history has demonstrated it. Don't you agree?

File: Fernando Martinez.jpg (67KB, 554x444px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 554x444px

>>3363198
How will La Raza ever recover?

>>3363463
No. Because you have to add 15000 more years for the Amerindian "achievements" to happen. You were not created later, you came out of Africa like we did, and managed to do way less than us in way more time. LOL at you pathetic faggots.

>>3363600
No. That's fucking retarded. Genetics doesn't work like that, you dumb cunt. You needed 15000 more years to be able to build some bronze tools, faggot. Deal with it.

>>3363760
Wrong. As Amerindians started again and had to do what europeans did all over again in less time. History shows that Amerindians had a higher development rate.
>>3363788
>genetics doesn't work like that
>amerindians existed in middle east
Hmm...
As I said before, all archeological remnants show that Amerindians had to start from the beginning all over again in America. Yet they developed quicker and had more disadvantages. It's obvious Amerindians were superior to europeans. Don't you agree?

File: Tenochtitlan New Spain 1500s.png (374KB, 500x377px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 500x377px

my ancestors :)

>>3363865
>started again
Wrong. They just did jack shit for 15000 years. They sucked, their "development rate" was shit and your arguments are shit as well.

File: Nuragic_life.jpg (92KB, 491x650px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 491x650px

>>3360038
My ancestors :)

>>3363865
>amerindians existed in middle east
Amerindians existed, that's the point. They didn't get magically different after touching the American soil. And they didn't manage to get anything done for 15000 years.

File: 1390261414312.jpg (20KB, 120x120px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 120x120px

>>3363969
except constant tribal warfare. No different than zulus

>>3363969
>Amerindians existed
In America. Which were different than the early settlers from 25000BC.

As history demonstrates, Amerindian superiority is self evident. Are you gonna deny history? Hehe

>>3360604
Italian anon? are you sure your ancestors survived justinian wars?

>>3360038
They look retarded

>>3364971
how dare u put Antonescu? He was nazi

File: w1500-Maclise-Strongbow-Aoife.jpg (292KB, 1500x918px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 1500x918px

>>3360038
>my ancestor

>>3361890
>what the fuck is that head? A dog?
Yes, it was their symbol of loyalty

>>3360604
>>3364195

I was always told that I had Gothic ancestry by the German side of my family, but they were super pomp Prussians so who the fuck knows.

>>3363286
>Germany:
>> Fucked to shit with economic constraints in WWI
>> by WWII basically becomes a superpower

I agree with everything in your post except this.

Germany came out of WWI better than any of the major players bar the US and the UK.

>>3363948
Hehe
You can keep denying facts. Yet the development rate from Amerindians was superior.
Amerindian superiority is a historical fact. Try again.

>>3365116
No, they didn't. War economy isn't economy.

File: be7a99c6d098075f8a2be9f0e8521c3b.jpg (96KB, 760x546px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 760x546px

>>3360038

>>3361390
>>3361463
Haha.

>>3361680
the left can't meme

>>3365674
So it's not based on facts?

>>3365116
>Germany came out of WWI better than any of the major players bar the US and the UK
What is this? Did you forget the constant political unrest during the early days of Weimar, the huge debt (not just reperations but the debt to the german people), the territorial losses and the fragile economy? Not to mention the political isolation

>>3365086
>gothic ancestry
there is a big chance you're swedish or slavshit

my ancestors killed magellan
flips 1 - portugal 0

File: PEPE.jpg (136KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 960x720px

>>3364009
>>3365207
No, they were the same thing. Amerindians sucked, and you suck as well. It's self evident. Are you gonna deny history? Hehe

>>3365887
All wrong. The superior amerindian development rate is self evident. Try again, subhuman.

File: IMG_20170911_162731.jpg (36KB, 552x632px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 552x632px

>>3365895
Shut the fuck up, inferior being. You are cucks, you have been cucked and will stay cucked forever. Even your continent is named after an Italian, and there's nothing you can do about it.

>>3365869
>achievement killing an old guy
>people still got cucked by Spain

Embarrassing

>>3365674
>the left can't meme
What? that post was clearly just stating what his skin wouldn't be as a joke

>>3366096
So you agree with Amerindian superiority? Great for you.

File: Celts_Warriors01_full.jpg (42KB, 525x340px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 525x340px

>>3360038
My ancestors :)
I like more rome though

>>3361698
Fuck you

>>3366147
Subhuman detected.

>>3360038
Looks like we got a Survive the Jive fanboy.
I bet you think Celts and Germans are the same people don't ya.

The fucks should I know who my ancestors are

- Bul'the most haplogroups in europe'garian

>>3361649
>mfw my ancestor captured Aguinaldo

>>3366150
Who knows you papá? How many coups do you have? You are probably a jealous nigger

File: white_america.png (379KB, 998x826px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 998x826px

Your ancestors :)

File: 1487964819548.jpg (9KB, 225x250px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 225x250px

>>3366155
Whelp, historical accounts say - Slavs + Bulgars
Genetics say - Thracians + Bulgars
FYROMians say - Tatars
/his/ says - Turk rape babies

>>3366153
celts are irrelevant cucks that don't even speak their own language, meanwhile germanics are true conquerors and alphas. - to answer your question. no, they cannot be the same people.

>>3366165
Subhuman detected.

>>3360038
How ashamed they must be of you.

>>3366128
No. I agree with European, Asian and even African superiority to Amer*ndians. AKA the only truth.

File: Sumer Statue.jpg (25KB, 301x400px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 301x400px

>>3360038
my ancestor :)

>>3366555
Incas were superior to europeans though.

File: 1459011398685-int.jpg (131KB, 629x800px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 629x800px

>>3366606
>Inc*s
>superior to someone
Kek, no.

File: Inca_empire.jpg (106KB, 638x654px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 638x654px

>>3366606

File: urartufeatserpents.jpg (83KB, 650x390px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 650x390px

My ancenstors :)

>>3366166
99% of US blacks have some white in them. Slavery-era was the biggest cuckfest of blackbois in history

>>3366637
>>3366669
Try again with some facts, chimp. hehe

Inca superiority is a historical fact. Get over it, monkey.

>>3366820
Ebin

>>3365895
>muh development rate

>>3366415
i doubt that. i get more pussy in a day than you did in your entire life

File: Muh Ancestors.png (81KB, 127x399px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 127x399px

A proud and noble peoples.

>>3367526
You fucking child. I've drunk more beer and banged more quiff and pissed more blood and stomped more ass that all of you numbnuts put together.

File: Bray,_Jan_de_Regents_of_the_Children's_Orphanage_in_Haarlem.jpg (152KB, 1202x900px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1202x900px

my ancestors

>>3365674
gb2reddit

File: IMG_0648.jpg (179KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 1280x960px

My ancestors

File: viking_sea_battle.jpg (426KB, 763x490px) Image search: [Google]

426KB, 763x490px

Part of the most overhyped tribes people of all time.

For the most time we were digging stones left from the last ice age out of our wheat fields and fishing.

And now my cultural heritage is closely associated with nationalism and neo nazis.

Only good thing I can say about the Vikings is that they got around alot and made great ships, everything else is wrapped up in so much myth and modern misrepresentations in popular culture.

>>3361684
This is some form of wewuzing

>>3360896

Underrated post

File: 06afd2242498922af462951c96cd5c50--lynching-young-black.jpg (32KB, 470x357px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 470x357px

my ancestors

>>3367526
>life was about meaningless sex for Angles

Lol

>>3369526
all in life is about sex

>>3361711
your grandma got raped lol

>>3369543
Not really, you are just completely brainwashed by modern sex centric and alienating culture

>>3369574
it was always about sex, you beta faggot. struggle was always about reward, pussy is the reward.

>>3366168
>implying you guys aren't just central ottomans

File: Khajuraho-Madhya-Pradesh.jpg (38KB, 600x463px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 600x463px

My ancestors :)

File: Early turks.jpg (177KB, 1024x756px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 1024x756px

Here are mine.

File: Pillars-of-Creation.jpg (118KB, 1280x984px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1280x984px

>>3360038
My ancestors

>>3369592
kys now cringy faggot

>>3369850
not an argument.
sexual motivation is the biggest motivation. sex drive is what makes men acomplish things, someone asexual like you wouldn't understand it.

>>3369865
>sexual motivation is the biggest motivation
>t. napoleon hill aka babbys first self help book author

>>3369865
On the contrary, it's sex obsessed betas like you who justify their boring life and over all worthless existence by thinking that having sex with some ugly gold digger makes you "accomplished"

File: 14642211_839239816179048_770060606515437502_n.jpg (99KB, 703x960px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 703x960px

>>3365008
you are a retard

>>3369963
t. never had sex

>>3370022
t. had sex once and had to tell everyone about it

>>3370027
you're deluded. people get good education to have good job that pays good money, which in return grants them access to top tier pussy.
the sole reason of life is procreation.
everything revolves around sex, i'm sorry that you're so blind.

File: SUOMI.png (402KB, 500x661px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 500x661px

Any other finns here?

>>3370067
Not everyone is a passionless loser like you

File: imagemacro (53).jpg (82KB, 466x517px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 466x517px

>>3371155
Fingolian reporting in.

>>3360662
Who is that guy? I like the way he looks like.

>>3368829
but they were good mercenaries they were used pretty much in entire Europe after all

File: ea2995b0268d19e6c36ec8e7c6920460--africans.jpg (68KB, 736x535px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 736x535px

My ancestor :^)

The Romans considered us great mercenaries

File: 41745317ee18766a24a1b7a15b17021d--punic-wars-roman-legion.jpg (48KB, 542x400px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 542x400px

>>3371436

File: Numidia1.jpg (114KB, 793x1024px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 793x1024px

>>3371438

>>3362082
Was about to say that, this thread was going well until people went full retard

>>3361721
Whats going on in this picture?

File: Piruz Nahavandi.jpg (125KB, 905x1027px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 905x1027px

>>3360038
My ancestor :)

>>3361876
Brythons OUT

SAOR ALBA, SAOR EIRE

>>3369650
W-what exactly is happening here?

File: bfac6b36141449eaa1788d6df2babea4.jpg (140KB, 658x428px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 658x428px

AKHMAT CILA

File: irish-peasants.jpg (233KB, 640x399px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 640x399px

My ancestors :(

>>3371431
those are gauls

File: Battle_of_Ridgeway.jpg (205KB, 585x453px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 585x453px

Irish out reeeeeee

File: FOR THE KING.png (874KB, 680x557px) Image search: [Google]

874KB, 680x557px

>>3372108
Pizarro dared his men, when called back by royal decree, to stay with him and destroy the inca empire.
Damned legendary
He draws a line in front of all his men, as the virgin spaniard officer tries to get everyone back to Spain or whatever, and gets the attention of thousands.
He then points at the furthest end of the line and says "On that side lays Panama, with its poverty and coldness"
Then points to his side and says "On this side lays Peru, with all its riches and glory"
"Let he who is a true spaniard march with me to claim their rightful spot in history"

Thirteen knights famously remained with Pizarro, who proceeded to dick around until the Spanish crown sent reinforcements.
The knights where given plenty of land and titles, one of them in particular got a SHITTON of land in central america.

Fucking glorious

>>3374086
Didn't mention that one particular knight is yours truly's ancestor, still have a few of the lands given to him by the crown.

Pro; literal noble aristocratic spaniard
con; living in central america

File: 1441340422305.jpg (269KB, 962x1389px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 962x1389px

How come Brits have such a hardon for the Anglo-Saxons but not for the Romano-Britons?

File: Hispanized.jpg (253KB, 600x748px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 600x748px

>>3374086