Were the disputes over the Galicia because of some strategic

>>3352099
time period?

How about we stop using the word "clay"?

For the sake of national reunification
The area was split between poles and ruthenians

>>3352099
Mixed population of Poles and Ukranians so both of them could claim this territory

File: For how many years was part of Poland.jpg (632KB, 2048x1150px) Image search: [Google]

632KB, 2048x1150px

>>3352099
historic and nationalistic dispute lwów/lviv was populated mostly by Poles and Polish Jews.

Mostly Austria Prussia and Russia were intimidated by Polandd size and during the 18th century they had constitutional crisis that caused Russia to approach Austria and Prussia about a partition which saw Austria getting Poland.

Austria would not pass up an opportunity to shrink the size of its neighbor at the same time as gaining territory relatively equal to Russia and Prussia.


Austrian politicians also saw it as an opportunity to show how Austrian Germans could spread civilization to undeveloped areas and wanted to use it to experiment with a new ground up political system that was loyal to a new concept of the 'Austrian Empire' and dismantled the Polish nobility

>>3352099
I'm 80% certain it's very good farmland.

>>3352115
It's an English word you fucking retard nigger faggot.

>>3352115
How about you fuck off back to plebbit

>>3352115
>How about we stop using the word "clay"?

But...it's so functional. Everyone understands the concept behind it already.

>>3353030

>"Dismantled the Polish nobility"
>Let the Polish nobility dominate the regional assembly and fuck over the Ukrainians

What did Austria mean by this?