You can assemble a team of up to 6 of the world's most famous conquerors, emperors, generals, etc from throughout history to attempt to conquer and rule the world with. Who do you choose and why?
Why the fuck would a great man of history want to team up with an autistic sperg? If I was forced to do this I'd pick people who were competent but unambitious so they don't backstab me half-way through.
>>3351927
Otto von Bismarck, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, Robert E. Lee, Napoleon Bonaparte, Gustavus Adolphus, Albert Speer (muh logistics)
>>3351982
>Catholics and people who hated Catholics
>>3351927
Nero, Ragnar Lodbrok, Vlad the Impaler, Ghengis Khan, and Caligula
Donald Trump, Mike Pence, Rick Tillerson, Jim Mattis, John Kelly and Jeff Sessions.
>>3351982
>Choosing Speer for logistics
Literally why.
>>3351927
Alexander (army group center)
Frederick the Great (group left)
Rommel (cavalry group right)
Napoleon (leading from the rear)
Caesar (politics, siege planning)
Sebudai (scouting, logistics)
>>3354203
>alexander
>in center
You do realize alexander led a cavalry and rode in from the side engaging smaller groups and stealing the glory at the end right? Parmenion was the entire brains of the macedonian conquest until alexander killed him after he went schizo
>>3354300
Of course. The battle I was basing his position on is his greatest and last, Gaugamela, where he led from the center.
The macedonian center without Alex wasn't anything to sneeze at, either.