Lets talk about blood libel
>>3351710
>Lets talk about blood libel
What do you call killing someone for a "god" except human sacrifice?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QageVk0vAQ
>>3351710
Well, the first one is already wrong because Josephus lived from 37 to 100 CE. And in this passage he cites Apion. This is his response.
>Now this is such a most tragical fable as is full of nothing but cruelty and impudence; how comes it about that we take an oath, and conspire only against the Grecians, and that by the effusion of their blood also? Or how is it possible that all the Jews should get together to these sacrifices, and the entrails of one man should be sufficient for so many thousands to taste of them, as Apion pretends? Or why did not the king carry this man, whosoever he was, and whatsoever was his name, [which is not set down in Apion's book,] with great pomp back into his own country? when he might thereby have been esteemed a religious person himself, and a mighty lover of the Greeks, and might thereby have procured himself great assistance from all men against that hatred the Jews bore to him. But I leave this matter; for the proper way of confuting fools is not to use bare words, but to appeal to the things themselves that make against them...
>>3351710
Matthew 27
When Pilate saw that he could not prevail at all, but rather that a tumult was rising, he took water and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, “I am innocent of the blood of this just Person.[d] You see to it.”
And all the people answered and said, “His blood be on us and on our children.”
Then he released Barabbas to them; and when he had scourged Jesus, he delivered Him to be crucified.
I don't know how many generations that lasted though.
This was the pizzagate of its day. Rly makes you think
>>3351710
Interesting thing is that the meme came from Christians and their transmutation meme. When Romans heard the Christians are drinking blood, they took it literally