Why did Crusades fail?

File: turk vs crusader.png (31KB, 742x418px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 742x418px

because wh*Tes are physically weak compared to us. we always kicked their subhuman skulls in. wh*Tes CAN NEVER FIGHT without the toys that shoot bullets.

>>3342468
proofs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkINjqLet-U

>>3342458
Because God was against them

Because Jerusalem wasn't worth it. They should have either focused on retaking the whole of Anatolia, or former Christian strongholds like Egypt or Syria.

Coherency was also a problem, since the Crusades were a shaky union of multiple states

File: 1504623863246.jpg (54KB, 570x480px)

54KB, 570x480px

>>3342468
turks are pretty much white tho

File: anatolians.png (277KB, 854x797px)

277KB, 854x797px

>>3342514
nice bullshit meme map, my genetically inferior, Yakub's spawn, sperm coctail of inferior subhumans buddy.

>>3342458

The Northern Crusades worked out fine.

>>3342523
if your small brain didn't make a sense out of this chart, i'll explain
we're only 18.5% european on average.

Mostly because of failures in logistics or diplomacy.

Why'd the Byzantines not support the 1st crusade more? Stephen of Blois cocked it all up. Why'd the 2nd Crusade fail? Because the French king and German emperor tried to walk massive armies across Anatolia. Why'd the third one fail? Because Richard didn't marry Phillip's sister and instead married some other bitch, effectively starting what would eventually turn into the hundred years' war. Fourth? Lack of funds and perfidious Venetians. Fifth? They refused to accept Damietta instead of Jerusalem; they literally would've had a foothold in Egypt the fucking idiots. Sixth? Technically a victory; Frederick II gained Jerusalem through diplomacy. Seventh? Famine, disease, generally shit luck.