What's the biggest spook in all of human history?
Fedora wearers
>>3338702
Afterlife
>>3338702
Martin Luther King
Leftism.
Marriage
>>3338702
"Consciousness"
What does spook mean?
>>3338863
It's not real but people build value around it instead of just serving their own self interest as though the spook in question were real.
>>3338869
Oh. That's interesting, thanks for the quick reply.
>>3338863
Derogatory term for a black person
God naturally
Monogamy?
all thoughts/ideas/concepts
>>3338773
>unironically believing in what an insane terrorist anarchoprimitivist loser said
>>3338702
Love
>>3338702
There's one that's common to people across all cultures and ways of life.
"Muh bloodline" and "muh progeny" is the ultimate spook. Nothing else has consumed so much human energy for no actual reward.
>>3338863
>>3339043
After being cheated on by the love of my life I agree. Stay single, boys.
Cultural identity? I can see how other people might find it important but outside of some history and religious mythology, I've never had an interest in my background.
>>3339043
>>3339048
t. MGTOW
>>3339068
I'm just in a lot of pain right now, brother. I'm sorry for bringing it here, i know it's not the place.
Egoism.
>>3339111
nah my bad. i was cheated on by my love too, years ago. best advice i can give is to stop thinking about it in terms of being betrayed, or in terms of victim/perpetrator, etc. the sooner you can wish her happiness in your heart, the sooner you can get back on the horse. i'd recommend going on dates with other girls as soon as possible (i wasted 3 years moping around). you never really get over it until you change into another person in another stage of life. seeing someone else helps you do that, then you can love them fully. the happiest part of your life is ahead of you. good luck brother
>>3339532
Thanks man. I have a rebound date on Saturday.
>>3338702
progress
Buddhism, stoicism, taoism, etc.
>>3338702
History
>>3338746
I c wat u did thar
>>3338702
physicalism
>>3339606
>not getting hooked on cocaine and blowing all of your money on whores
kys.
free will
& Humanities
>>3339042
>insane terrorist anarchoprimitivist
I think the word you're looking for is genius?
>>3338702
feminism
>>3338702
>spooks
You can literally call anything a spook. Spooking is equivelant to covering your hears going "I can't heeeaaarr you!"
It's just a catchy word you can apply to anything you disagree with.
>>3339042
>insane terrorist anarchoprimitivist
You call me bro
>>3338702
Big fat pussy lips
>>3338702
Human history
Existence
>>3338702
Your life
morality
Mathematics
>>3338702
Consciousness and it's supposed higher states
>>3338702
human rights
>>3338702
The idea that existence has any meaning by itself
>>3338702
spooks
This thread desu
>>3338702
Morality
>>3342071
haha you wot m8?
>>3342197
Correct, also the ego, if bye ego we mean an immortal individual soul, but that's basically afterlife
>>3338702
Anything in existence can be a spook. The ego is by far the most broadly-popular and destructive though. Every day countless souls injure themselves in an irrational drive to pleasure their petty personalities for just another brief moment.
>>3345363
And so-called "self-interest" is of course the root cause of all other spooks.
>>3345329
This
>>3341995
Lol so incorrect
God. Obviously
>>3338869
No dumbass it is an abstraction one places above one's ego. Whether or not said abstraction is real or not is irrevelant. Only its relation to the ego matters.
What you are describing is social construct
Murder
Believing spooks are bad things and thinking Stirner's philosophy was advisory rather than informative. Stirner wasn't saying "this is how *you* should act", he was saying this is how men who have evolved beyond modern men act. Indeed, think Stirner was outlining some kind of utopian ideal world and you absolutely follow his philosophy is exactly what Stirner was lampooning, the modern spiritual man.
>>3345363
Ah, another thread of "let's comment on Stirner without reading him". First, spooks aren't real, Stirner didn't "believe in them", he didn't believe you shouldn't do anything that benefits others, and "egoism" in his German context doesn't mean being self centered, it means a person spirit. You can't understand what he meant by spooks without reading the passages about heaven-stormers, because he believed language hadn't evolved far enough to describe these metaphysical concepts and instead used poetic language and metaphors. He's not always talking literally.
>>3345438
All abstractions are non-real. The non-real part isn't irrelevant at all, it's the whole point of using the term 'spook' (AKA 'ghost') since it has connotations of something that isn't really there. And aside from that autistic attempt at nitpicking you just wrote the same thing the post you replied to said. So I'm guessing you don't actually have a point and just wanted to show everyone how smart you are for having read the Stirner wikipedia article by parroting a summary you don't understand well enough to recognize as already having been communicated here.
Working class
>>3339043
This is too much to be real.
>>3339068
And?
>>3339043
Correct, I understood this when I was 15
Skellingtons
>>3341942
If you call him a genius, it says more about your level of intellect than it says about his.
>>3339044
t.Shitskin
>>3346010
But then how do we have a large stellar bureaucracy with a massive war machine with which to crush and remove the irredeemable alien races that encrust the stars like filth on the galaxy if it comes to it?
>>3338702
The self
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rwPPrxjqKY
>>3348078
Are you really so invested in your progeny for your self worth that you have to assume that someone making light of such concepts has to be of a race you deem inferior?
>>3339042
>Literal math genius
>loser
Lmao he achieved more in his life than you ever will ANTFAtard
>>3339532
That painting is so beautiful it hurts my chest.
>>3348195
that episode from Xavier the fallen angel is like a 4chin argument
>>3348903
>achieving anything through math
liberal faith
>>3346190
>dissecting a label translated from German this austistically instead of actually reading what was said.
It is irrevelant. Striner never made any attempt to confirm or deny the existence of god as his whole point to act regardless of God's existence.
What I am saying is fundamentally different from you. You claim Striner says that spooks are not real and exist to inhibit the ego whereas I claim Striner says spooks are abstractions that the ego puts more importance in than itself, when it is supposed to be sovereign.
>being this mad in getting an akcutally post
Maybe stop showing off your stupidity
>>3349173
>exist to
And yet