>successor of Rome tier
Great Britain
France
>impressive tier
Russia
Spain
Germany
>still had an empire tier
Netherlands
Portugal
Sweden
Poland (Lithuania)
Austria
>disappointment tier
Denmark
Italy
Belgium
Hungary
Greece
>at least somebody noticed they exist tier
Switzerland
Bulgaria
Serbia
Czechia
>nobody gives a fuck tier
everybody else
>(list is based on general historical relevance, including but not limited to: Amount of land owned, amount of people ruled, trading importance, length of rule over said areas, scientific and cultural progress that came from said country, amount of scientists, inventors and great artists produced, all compared to the relative size of said nation to achieve equality, and on timeline from ~600 AD to current time)
>be successor of Rome
>get overrun by niggnogs and muslims
>>3336266
Just like the original Rome?
>>3336253
More /int/ garbage on my board.
>>3336253
>Britain
>get lucky, create the largest empire in history
>lose almost all of it in 50 year
The British Empire was Mongol tier. Hell even the Mongol Empire lasted longer.
but muh Congo
>>3336253
well Hungary could be still had an empire tier
>>3336521
pottery
>>3336253
>Comparing UK to France
Maximum KEK
A country that cannot win land wars by itself against another european power cannot be a successor or Rome.
>Germany Impressive
>>3336253
>successor of Rome tier
Finland
>impressive tier
Turkey
Germany
Poland(-Lithuania)
Georgia
Austria
Greece
>still had an empire tier
Russia
Britain
France
Netherlands
>disappointment tier
Serbia
Italy
Spain
>at least somebody noticed they exist tier
Portugal
Sweden
Denmark
Hungary
Switzerland
Bulgaria
Czechia
>non-country tier
Belgium
FYROM
Bosnia
Fixed that for you
>>3336253
google Kalmar.
>>3336984
For a good laugh?
>>3336553
>hundreds of years of complex diplomacy, deception and wars
>get lucky
wew lad
>>3336994
Wait, kiddo, UK has somewhat influence in the XIVth and XVth centuries due to the HYW and then again since the XIXth Century. The rest of the time they were in their island being mediocre.
Granted their jump with the industrialization is amazing, but that greentext is a rather romanticized delusion.
>>3336528
No, anon, you don't understand
> based on general historical relevance
See? This makes it all okay
>>3336253
>disappointment tier
>Hungary
yeah...
>>3336728
True, it may have been the Kingdom of Hungary, but there were still like 5-6 different ethnic groups
>>3336969
who could be behind this post?
>>3336253
>everything important happened here tier:
Italy
>>3337034
>countries = ethnic groups
I hate brainlets.
>>3336969
>turkey
>impressive
>>3336969
>what is the finnish empire
lmao more like rome is the successor of binland
>>3337022
Head up lad, I like Hungary
>>3336253
All time rankings:
1.UK
3.France
4.Germany(+Austria)
5.Italy
6.Russia
7.Spain
8.Sweden
9.Poland
10.Greece
11.Denmark
12.Portugal
13.Netherlands
14.Hungary
15.Bulgaria
16.Serbia
17.Czechia
18.Norway
19.Croatia
20.Romania
21.Lithuania
Honorary mention: Belgium, Switzerland
>>3340060
shit, i skipped over #2, france is 2, germany 3, etc.
>>3336253
Portugal should be over the G*rms desu, the controlled a bigger slice of the world, last country to say goodbye to its colonies, much more impressive military record and history.
G*rms are a disappointment
>>3336253
>trading importance, length of rule over said areas, scientific and cultural progress... amount of scientists, inventors and great artists
>Italy a disappointment
It literally excelled at all of those criteria.
>>3337034
not because of ethnicity but it had bohemia under its crown, personal unions with poland, HRE emperor as king, rightful successor of the crown of Naples
it was a big player until 16th century so disappointment tier is kinda ok? shadow of former self
>>3336253
Tbh Finland has the best claim to being the successor of Rome
>>3336266
>80%
we're fine for now.