1) Where do Mongoloids come from? There must be some kind of Mongoloid "homeland", since they inhabit environments which vary wildly climatically.
2) What did Mongoloids look like 25,000 years ago?
2) Are Han Chinese a hybrid of northern & southern Mongoloid
4) What are the connections between the Uralics and Tungusics of Siberia?
5) What isn't there a human population which is an exact blend of Caucasian and Mongoloid traits? All the Central Asian republics clearly exhibit recent intermixing.
>>3335819
>) What isn't there a human population which is an exact blend of Caucasian and Mongoloid traits
Kazhakistani, Native Americans to a degree
>>3335836
I believe Native Indians started as flat-faced Siberians and selection produced beaky noses and pseudo-Caucasian features
>>3335819
They come from Siberia, slanted eyes is a protection against siberian weather
Kazakhstan is a result of Mongoloids and Caucasians mixing
The only population of hybrid traits which comes to mind is possibly the Finns
>>3335844
Nah, Native Americans have like 40% ANE which many Europeans have from 6 to 30% depending on the group
Why are the Japanese and Koreans comfortable having white man armies on their soil, as a block against the Chinese?
Why are the mainland Chinese seen as so alien? No one seems to like these people. Even the Taiwanese prefer Japan.
>>3335876
Because mainland Chinese are a buncha autistic faggots who love to blob and absorb everything around them. Asia under China will be 10x worse than anything Japan offered in WW2.
Spook
>>3335919
Why are the "official Chinese" based in Beijing arseholes
Yet outsiders have a favourable view of Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Macau, Bangkok, various Chinatowns etc
Maybe China is just too big and unwieldy to govern humanly?
>>3335876
>Koreans and Japanese comfortable
Are you retarded
They protest and chimp out at military bases all the time, and it's the official party rhetoric of their left-wing parties. However it's all larping and their actual power structure is as American protectorates
>>3336188
>implying those """protesters""" aren't payed by the chinese