Gaesatae

>>3332240
SO THAT YOU COULD SEE THE HONOR AND POWER AND PURE MANLINESS OF THE THROBBING ERECTIONS COMING AT YOUR LINES READY TO ANALLY VIOLATE YOU SHOULD YOUR DEFENSE BUCKLE FOR EVEN A MOMENT. THE INTIMIDATION FACTOR IS WORTH MORE THAN ANY "ARMOR".

>>3332247
How can you walk with straight pointed hard on? Did celts have CURVED PENISES?

>>3332240
You would think having a naked dude charge at you with a sword is scarier than someone clothed.

>>3332240
looking at cocks feels uncomfortable.

why do they need clothes in the first place

Imagine receiving a spear or an arrow directly in the urethra

Dumb celtcucks

File: titusCrop.png (278KB, 1000x736px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 1000x736px

>>3333070
"This drunken fool has no armor, and is charging without a clear formation."
*whistles*
*forms shield wall*
*stabs hundreds of naked barbarians*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJO2UfG9KcI

File: 1487732964569.jpg (75KB, 736x1104px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 736x1104px

>>3332240
As far as I'm aware historians differ on why they did it with the two most common answers being that:
A) They did it to show how fearless they were which would inspire fear into the enemy.
B) They did it to not get get pieces of fabric stuck in their wounds as that would drastically increase the risk of infection.
C) A combination of A and B.

Celts tended to fight shirtless if they didn't own armour IIRC.

>>3332240
becuz berserk

>>3332240

they were low iq

that's why europe is a shithole nowadays

It meant you weren't going to lightly tap each others' shields with your spears at a distance until one side gets tired and goes home, this guy and all his friends are going to try and kill you in short order.

>>3334174
plus if all you have is cloth then in practice it's really not that much of a difference even compared to nothing

They did it because they had faith in there gods.

>>3334009
Yeah, completely different to receiving an arrow in the urethra while wearing clothes