Was there really no difference between the Hutus and Tutsis?
>>3331614
Not really. Few cultural differences. Nothing that would excuse the genocide, its not like they were jews or something.
>>3331614
Tutsis are on average a foot taller than Hutus. The Rwandan genocide was a beta uprising.
There were probably some Hutus who have narrower features and some Tutsi with more sub Saharan features, but there probably was enough difference to actually enforce the decision to favor one based on the criterion used.
tutsi were mixed with some of the Cushitic peoples (Somali, mostly Oromo) who migrated down and were eventually mixed in with the bantu migration
This made them have some features that differentiated them from others.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamites#Hamiticised_Negroes
It was a big part of the Hamitic hypothesis.
Oy boy here we go again. The Dutch didn't invent the ethnic divide between the Hutus and Tutsis. It was there before they arrived. During their rule they changed it from being an actual ethnic divide by blurring it to were a Hutu can become Tutsi merely by owning cattle. The divide became so blurred they had to issue id cards and documentation to properly tell who was who.
>>3331614
>Hutus and Tutsis?
Who are we rooting for?
>>3331625
>>3331642
the caucasians
>>3331642
The Hutus are the "black" ones and the Tutsis are the "white" ones. That's why no one cared when the Hutus were killing the Tutsis.
>>3331614
Yes, there is one. Hutus leaders spend all their time serving the interest at the Hutu people at the depend of the Tutsi, and the Tutsi leaders do the opposite.
And the "dumbest post of the day" award goes to >>3331658
>>3331658
>muh white blaming
Your extinction is near. Face your replacement, subhuman.
>>3331614
Tutsis have clear caucasoid features like high cheekbones, hooked and straight noses, and a good jawline
>>3331614
Hutus look more like ape niggers.
"The Chad Pastoralist"
"The Virgin Farmer"
>>3331634
>Hello there my white brother!