Why do you still believe in God when science has proven that

File: Equation3[1].png (6KB, 500x226px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 500x226px

1/10

You really need to work on your baiting skills. Here's your pity (you)

>>3330399
>letting a disabled "scientist" influence your worldview.

As long as science cannot give us any facts about the time before the birth of our current universe or what happens after death, some people will find the idea of a creator still entertaining.

>>3330399
>what is causality

>>3330399
He literally says that science can't disprove God, but that it can explain the universe without a God.
That doesn't mean there isn't one, man.

>>3330435
Why believe in stories so obviously made up by humans to justify the existence of a god, though?

>science
>proof
Irrelevant
>laws of physics
Nonexistent
>>3330412
Science is invalid and irrelevant, sorry!
>>3331028
>obviously made up
t. sperglord

how =/= why
when we ask why stop pretending like we are asking how
autismo non grata

>>3330412
You sound scared

>>3330412
>time before the birth of our current universe
This is a nonsense question, there was no "time" before the universe.

>>3331553
Not sure how you come to that conclusion. Didn't even entertain my own beliefs, just tried to show OP a different perspective.

>>3331555
Nobody knows what exactly 'was' before the universe. That's one of the reasons people find spirituality still interesting.

>>3331035
>God would not give his universe physical laws, no it's all pixie dust and his sweat

You are a false Christian.