Should genetic autism be banned from this board?

Why do you hate it? Population genetics are becoming an essential subset of anthropology. Deal with it.

File: ftdna.png (73KB, 1464x525px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1464x525px

>he's not at least 50% farmer

You should probably kill yourself if this describes you, barbarian.

File: Temple_of_Nebelivka,_Ukraine._reconstruction,_c_4000_B.C..jpg (108KB, 510x350px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 510x350px

>>3329665
My ancestors :)

I'm guessing Englishman?

it's one of the few subjects on here with an actual scientific basis.

>>3329655

YOU HATE WHAT YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND

No it shouldn't be, but pseudo science should be banned.

Haplogroup posters should be banned
Those who prefer 23andme over gedmatch should be banned
Sourceless pca plot posters should be banned (in that case you should also be banned)

>>3329655
>advocating genocide towards germans
Anon, stop.

>>3329695
>haplogroups
>pseudoscience

Show me on the doll where the big bad scientist proved you weren't the pure Aryan your parents told you you were

>>3329709
Haplogroups do not tell a shit about your ethnic make up you inbred poltard. You could have R1b as your Y-Dna yet have like 1% or 2% european dna.

>>3329690
>it's one of the few subjects on here with an actual scientific basis.

Used in completely unscientific ways and completely misunderstood.

File: b36.png (7KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 420x420px

>>3329732
Hmmmm, you sure are irrationally angry about haplogroups, which are actual science, but you haven't said anything about the pseudoscience that is phrenology, which is unironically espoused by the vast majority of shitposters on this website.

I sure hope the tremendous amount of butthurt you feel towards haplogroups isn't motivated by their failure to conform to your primitive 18th-century racial superstitions?

>>3330518
>implying phrenology isn't used to approximate the mental faculties of homo Neanderthals, homo erectus, and other fossils of man's progenitors
>implying phrenology isn't more scientific than 99% of the garbage sociology departments churn out
>implying physiognomy is not indeed real