In biology and medicine, the common treatment for a cancerous

File: IMG_1076.jpg (24KB, 193x262px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 193x262px

>>3326404
It goes against the mainstream morality. Basically you're saying "kill the unwantables bc their net effect is too negative." But you have to define unwantables and at what point does their net effect become so negative that they should die and you have to answer why you shouldn't kill them if their existence is only negative but it's not really their fault. "What about the elderly, the retards, and criminals who could possibly be rehabilitated?" They'll say. It's just because humans do have a sort of collective mind set and "hurting one is hurting us all" mentality. And honestly a world where in all unwantables are killed off immediately sounds a little despotic to most people. Almost like it would end up like a "1984" scenario.

Pic unrelated

>>3326404
Well for one thing, once you start engaging in such policies, there's no reason not to extend them further. Why not kill everybody who isn't either a good looking healthy person with high intelligence and a positive tax contribution, or is willing to slave for those people as a second-class entity?

>>3326404
Because "Acting up" can be defined as just about anything. Defend yourself, being loud, not talking bullshit form others, being assertive, not being a meek little bitch, accidentally bumping into someone, bring in the "wrong place" etc. Any petty fuck can use the system to fuck anyone they don't like and be a total fuckwad.

>>3326507
I don't know. Why don't we?

>>3326404
>Why do humans not engage in this practice?
They do, what the fuck are you on about. What do you think death/long term prison sentences are?

kuso thread