Was he right?

>>3320419
Yes

One of the most right men in history.

The west were only "concerned" about blacks during Rhodesia, not nowadays when people have it muh worse and are literally starving.

Nope. Now go back to welcome your new african neighbours.

>>3320419
It doesn't matter because the whole situation was completely outside his control.
But yes, he was reasonable and fairly liberal-minded and even agreed to majority rule until the frontline states threw a tantrum and piled more idiotic demands on

>>3322422
>But yes, he was reasonable and fairly liberal-minded

Anon he explicitly added a lot of the restriction and laws in Rhodesia under his rule. He was never "reasonable" or "liberal-minded" because he only became that when it turns out white rule wasn't gonna last for nearly ever or be extremely easy to prolong anymore. He WAS the white minority rule guy in a party EXPLICITLY out to cement.