"Rule of some"

Term you're looking for is Oligarchy, and it's far older than fascism.
Though Italy and Nazi Germany were oligarchies.

>>3313492
Definitely not this, as i said, its something-cracy or maybe -ism, but iam much more sure about the cracy.

Ochlocracy.

>>3313479

MAYBE "JUNTOCRACY".

>>3313492

THE THIRD REICH WAS NOT AN OLIGARCHY, BUT AN AUTOCRACY.

>>3313581

OCHLOCRACY IS "MOBRULE"; "OCHLOCRACY" IS NOT THE TERM THAT THE "ORIGINAL POSTER" IS SEARCHING.

Fascism was the rule of some, usually a clique with a cult of personality at its center. It's part of why they fail so spectacularly, when the personality at the center dies he either cannot be replaced or the fight among the inner circle to replace them fractures the government.

Corpocracy? Plutocracy? Timocracy?

>>3313770
Sadly no, iam sure it wasnt anythign about the rich, just about some.

File: 4L_8BTPtrGA.jpg (55KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 600x450px

>>3313707
No one likes you trip fag
You're an egotistical /pol/tard
FUCKING AUTISM
I bet you don't even get laid considering the you must spend here
anytime I log into this site I see your stupid trip with your stupid comments that are like
" HERR DERR TALK IN RIDDLES MEANS IM SMARTER THAN YOU "
>inb4 all caps response
>inb4 you brag about your awesome pretend life

Kratocracy?