Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
Anonymous
Why was Social democracy in early 20th century so radical and violent compared to post-ww2 period? 2017-08-28 03:19:40 Post No. 3302409
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Why was Social democracy in early 20th century so radical and violent compared to post-ww2 period? 2017-08-28 03:19:40 Post No. 3302409
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 1024px-Antifascist_Circle_BW.svg.png (54KB, 1024x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
54KB, 1024x1024px
Why was Social democracy in early 20th century so radical and violent compared to post-ww2 period?
Anonymous
2017-08-28 03:19:40
Post No. 3302409
[Report]
>>
File: 1500724172289.jpg (199KB, 720x960px)
199KB, 720x960px
>>3302409
So imagine you were a civilan after ww1,food was basically non-existent,the fascist and communist would kill you if you weren't on their side,bet you would have been violent too.
>>
File: Socdem_furs.png (146KB, 800x800px)
146KB, 800x800px
>>3302409
Because they were animals
>>
>>3302409
The life of the working class was so much harder back then. Today we have labor laws, safety requirements, some version of a safety net, etc. Back then you didn't have jack shit.
>>
>>3303066
Why did they stop being so violent then?
>>
interwar german politics were made with guns
>>
>>3302409
They had yet to be domesticated by consumerism.
>>
>>3302409
They were disillusioned by Stalin and the keynesian economics made capitalism tolerable for many.
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4