anarcho monarchism

>>3298062
is this a fetish thread?

oxymoron thread?

>>3298062
Whats anarcho monarchism anyway? Everyone gets to be king?

>>3298062
how many layers of meta are we currently?
how the fuck is having a king anarchy?

>>3298078
Every man a king!

File: Anarchowhat.png (226KB, 1240x1198px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 1240x1198px

>>3298062

>>3298087
EVERY HOME A CASTLE

File: ernst-jünger-military-history.jpg (26KB, 350x409px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 350x409px

I'm actually an anarch:
>“Although I am an anarch, I am not anti-authoritarian. Quite the opposite: I need authority, although I do not believe in it. My critical faculties are sharpened by the absence of the credibility that I ask for. As a historian, I know what can be offered.”

>>3298062
>anarcho monarchism

Isn't that just the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?

>elected king with extremely limited powers
>minimal taxes and state institutions
>every member of parliament has a right of veto
>armed rebellion against the government explicitly legal

etc.

>>3298169
>wanting to emulate the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth

no thanks senpai

>>3298062
WE

>>3298218
>hating liberty

>>3298087
hol up hol up
so you be sayin'
we was kangz?

>>3298087
but no one wears a crown?

File: 1502534884590.gif (311KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 300x300px

>>3298233
>hating order, the one good thing in life

Well, I'm close to it. I feel closer to Mauras' integral nationalism, which is a slightly less autistic version of whatever anarcho-monarchism wants to be.

>>3298100
Wut?

I can't tell if I'm too stupid for this or if this is too stupid for me.

I am opposed to anything individualistic and liberal-like.

I hate anarchism in which every man believes to be a master and I hate monarchism which considers men to be special on the basis of birth.

>>3298680
Well then what do you believe in

>>3298169
>>armed rebellion against the government explicitly legal

wait what

File: 1502490735500.png (1MB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1800x1200px

>>3298310
May your chains rest lightly on your shoulders and all that jazz.

>>3298100
Libertarians have to be the most retarded people on earth.

>>3298062
isnt that just feudalism?

>>3300389
Just that - nobles could band together and rebel against the king if they felt he was violating the law and/or engaging in unacceptable tyranny.

In practice that meant you had to legally state your specific grievances and had to stop if they were addressed, but if your rebellion was defeated you would be pardoned (or rather not tried for treason or any such crime - basically rebelling in good faith against perceived tyranny was not a crime).

You could say it's a sort of martial democratic process - if you can get enough of the country to rise up against tyranny to be an actual threat then you must have a point.

You could also see the logic behind it as sort of similar to the idea of duelling, i.e. putting your money where your mouth is and risking your life to push your political point is the respectable and honourable way to do it.

File: gavrilo.jpg (124KB, 1221x937px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1221x937px

>>3298062
LONG LIVE THE KING

File: image.png (126KB, 402x398px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 402x398px

>anarcho

>>3298081
Anarchy doesn't mean no government, just no hierarchy.