Thread replies: 4
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: Hamito-Semitic_languages.jpg (248KB, 898x590px) Image search:
[Google]
248KB, 898x590px
Where did Afroasiatic speakers and especially semitic ones originate from?
Natufians and related groups?
It seems so since Berbers and Egypshuns spoke Afroasiastic languages well before Mesopotamian mixed groups invaded them
Same thing with the Arabs who spoke Arab (This time a full fledged Semitic language) well before they mixed with the local Mesopotamians...
So iranian farmers spoke those weird Elamite/Dravidian languages and other wird ass isolated langauges like Sumerian and other weird CHG like languages like Hurrians, I don't about Anatolian farmers but they probably spoke something akin to Basque so something very looooooosely connected to Caucasus langauges like Hurrian, do I got this right?
While Natufians spoke some Semitic bullshit and other Pseudo basal Europeans spoke other Afroasiatic langauges like Beber or ancient Egypshun which are of the same langauge group as Semite (Afroasiatic)
>>
>I don't about Anatolian farmers but they probably spoke something akin to Basque so something very looooooosely connected to Caucasus langauges
we don't know what they spoke. there is absolutely no reason to assume they spoke anything related to basque. and basque is definitely not related to caucasian languages.
>>
>>3295607
Basque is pre indoeuropean nigger and basque are autosomically 70% European farmer, there are also a bunch of parallels in common in the pre IE "Mediteranean substrate" between Basque words and other common Pre IE words from regions like the Balkans and Sardinia
>>
>>3295570
>Where did Afroasiatic speakers and especially semitic ones originate from?
Afro-Astiatic speakers come either from the Horn, Egypt, or the Levant, genetically they were E1b1b.
Semitic speakers either comes from Maghreb, Egypt, or the Levant(Natufians), genetically they were E1b1b as well.
As for how they did it they peacefully migrated into Sumerian land, or spread it through violence.
>Natufians and related groups?
The most widepsread theory is that Natufians were Proto-Semites and conquered the Middle-East, then forced their language onto the Mesopotamians J1/J2. Genetically they were E1b1b and CT(most likely slave).
> I don't about Anatolian farmers but they probably spoke something akin to Basque so something very looooooosely connected to Caucasus langauges like Hurrian, do I got this right?
I heard that Hurro-Urartian is perhaps linked to Sumerians.
Thread posts: 4
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2