>is a group

File: Question Mark.jpg (2KB, 109x109px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 109x109px

>member of group or select chunk of group does something impressive (Scientific Revolution, Islamic Golden Age, Negroes Being Kangz, etc.)
>another member of group centuries later goes on about it and how it makes him great for being in the same group (see We Wuz Kangz N Shieet)
>a noticeable amount of group does horrid actions (see Whites being Leftists or supporting Trump, Black Criminality, Muslims Being Muslims)
>Point this out at member of group, saying he should be responsible and call out the members who are chimpingout.
>Then point out he should critique his background/culture/whatever and see what makes it have so much dysfunction/chimping/whatever without blaming outsiders (such as the Jews/Whitey/Whatever)
>Member of group gets sore about beind told this

How can you excuse boasting of somebody else's accomplishments and overall shill your group yet get indignant at being told to take responsibilty for your group and actually look at it critically?